Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 1415. page

>>8313316
POO

>>8313316
Commit suicide

>>8313316
The SAT is pretty easy for many people, but not necessarily 2400 easy. The thing is that if you get a 2400 on the SAT, you may be the top 0.1% or 0.05% (or whatever it is), but when you consider the number of people that take the test, you will have a fairly sizable group that scored 2400. It's not that it's easy (though it is in comparison to something like the LSAT or MCAT), it's just that perfect scores happen and they happen every year. On top of this, the SAT is basically a glorified IQ test. Anyone with an IQ over whatever 2400 corresponds to will still score a 2400 on the test (in theory), so you could expect to see a slight bump in incidence at the 2400 level if looking at the bell curve.

A mathematician, an engineer, and a statistician go deer hunting. After a while, they spot one.
The mathematician does some detailed calculations, takes aim, and shoots. However, having forgotten to account for the wind, the shot lands 5 metres to the left of its mark.
The engineer steps up, and, seeing the mathematician's mistake, points the rifle somewhere off to the right and shoots. Having overcompensated, the shot lands 5 metres to the right of the deer.
The statistician yells "We got' em boys!"

>>8313289
have heard it before but still kek

>>8313289
don't get it

>>8313252
well in any case you'll need to get a tinfoil hat and build an underground bunker if you want to survive

>>8313343

if you have no knowledge to share then kindly stfu

>>8313252
Research reactors use highly enriched uranium, where would they get it?

This is why physicists belong to /x/.

If you hypothesize that something is going to be 2 but it is 3
then hypothesize that something is going to be 3 but it is 4
then hypothesize that something is going to be 4 but it is 5
and so on

your formula is not entirely wrong, there's some unknown variable that adds up 1

that unknown variable is called... DARK

Equations don't have a solution in your number system?

[math]
x^2+1=0
[/math]

Add a hypothetical 'dark number' which satisfies the equation.

>>8313137
Is your refrigerator running?

Consciousness can be neither measured nor observed.

>If something cannot be measured or observed it does not exist.

We aren't even sure what consciousness is.

>>8313143

this could be confusing for people with autism.

P(n,n-5) = n!/(n-(n-5))! = n!/5! = n*n-1 *...7*6

>>8313075
Is there an easy way to figure that out? That is just jibberish to me. I just usally use the nPr key on the calculator but I cannot do that with no letters

>>8313061
Properties of random permutations can help analyze the performance of sorting algorithms, for one

buy a phone camera, an arduino, and a helium baloon, with some electronics skills you can make yourself a simple device that will go to the edge of space and capture the earth from space., you'll see the curvature of the earth.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EqPqtQrtn5Q

>>8313013
There useing a fisheye lens to make it look round lol

>>8312991
You're just a stupid Russian.

It's okay, your whole ethnic type is, generally, the most retarded of the Caucasians.

>>8312941

If you're starting a career in physics, then you should already know what calculator works best for you

>physics
>>>/x/

TI-83/84 is fine

Hell, engineer here, im in my 3rd year and only use a TI-30XII.

TI-84CE, Casio FX-CG10 and HP Prime are on my wishlist tbqh pham

>>8312908
[math]\mathcal B \subseteq C(\mathbb R)[/math] so [math]|\mathcal B| \le |C(\mathbb R)| = \bigl| \mathbb R^{\mathbb Q} \bigr| = \mathfrak c^{\aleph_0} = \mathfrak c < \mathfrak c^+[/math]

go meme somewhere else

>>8312908
But every student knows there is precisely one unique Barnett-integrable function to within isomorphism familia
Check your proof

>>8312908
>>8313052
stop talking nonsense
this filth bumped a perfectly good thread off page 10

they pass through each other

>>8312882
we don't and can't know, no such pair of objects exists

>>8312882
Where are you going to find an unmovable object?

Ultimately, all objects are in motion.

File: i_aint_clicking_that.jpg (43KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 250x250px

>>8312813

>>8312813
god damn that's pretty disturbing

>livelink

Nope

>he hasn't seen the true magic of calculus via mechanics

That's not what Laplace Transforms do

>>8312775
>converting them to complex numbers

You don't convert them, rather you "view" them as complex numbers. For example, the real number sin(x)·e^(b·x) can be viewed as the complex part of e^(x·(b+i))

>>8312748

Not just possible, happens all the time with muons for example

>physics
>>>/x/

>>8312748
as long as it doesn't meet or exceed

It's written by physcists, hence the /x/.

>>8312689
It's not even real philosophy.

>>8312689
>MD
nope. I only accept PhD.

>>8312655
DAHNALD

THE DELEGATES

You have to be actually interested in things to learn them well. If you're an apathetic fuck who found one thing that actually interests you, you're still not gonna give a fuck about anything else.

Writing/read are no problem cause you do that everyday on the computer.

You need to figure out why you're apathetic and develop at least some interest in what you're trying to learn.