Does lower back lordosis cause constipation?
bamp
bemp
bimp
I'm an atheist, bisexual, and a communist. I study quantum physics in my free time. I'm a professional model, but if you use that to wager my intelligence, screw off. If you misuse "your" and "you're", we won't hit it off.
So let's discuss quantum physics.
quantum physics is just a theory, nothing more. it was made up by humans and is not the way the universe actually works. how would quantum physics explain the human soul for example?
We won't use the fact you're a model to discredit you, we'll use the fact you thought it was relevant
>>8344362
>So let's discuss quantum physics.
What about it
So in humanities professors are more often than not, people who failed in their field.
An example: A women could not deliver in the corporate world, she got fired. She pursued a doctorate in Business Administration. She spends her days telling students about the glass ceiling preventing women from making it.
But how is it in STEM? Take physics professors. Are they people who failed to get a job at some LHC like in Cern? Or research magnetic rail guns. And instead has to teach college kids how to play with a multi-meter?
yep
>implying there are no people who genuinely enjoy teaching other people
Not everyone is as an anti-social as you.
Most of my professors are doing research, teaching is a requirement for them in order to hold their position at the university.
A fucking rock could wipe us out and there would be nothing we could do about it.
how does this make you feel?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bU1QPtOZQZU&ab_channel=AnselmoLaManna
Why is the universe so hostile to life?
>>8344284
I'm being violated by the universe.
Kall de polise
>what are nukes
We were already wiped out by an asteroid 3 years ago.
Is it possible to learn how to create a successful company or is it all a combination of genetics + right circumstances + luck?
I'd say it depends on your product and methods more than luck and circumstance
>>8344211
More like having a good idea+having money+knowing how to make more money of it
why do living organisms inherently kill each other?
is the next step for intelligent life to exist without killing?
americans are being killed by the rest of the world gaining intelligence
>>8344173
for energy, and presumably not, even if we invent something that can put pure energy into us it'll probably have loads of shitty side effects
>>8344181
it seems ironic for 'life' as a concept to exist with killing other living organisms as a fundamental basis, unless you look at life as a result of chemical reactions taking place under the physical constraints of the universe.
wouldn't this downplay any relevancy of consciousness as being anything other than chemical reactions?
is it safe to assume that consciousness is just an axiom that we will never be able to understand?
of any field?
has to be American born?
>>8344148
yes, so Einstein, Von Neumann etc. don't count
>>8344148
that would fight at the core of what being Murikkkan is
Humanoid robotics are pretty much the only thing I get excited for but it's also seems to be the area of robotics with the least funding and there are so many difficult challenges to overcome that I feel like nothing interesting but some service robots with stiff movement and chatbot tier AI will happen in my lifetime.
What do?
>>8344060
There is no practical application.
It's easier to just pave everything or use flat terrain most of the time. Or just make more rugged/inefficient wheels that can get past obstacles.
Legs and limbs took a very long time to evolve to the optimal state they are in now. It would be very hard to recreate them using only human brainpower.
Basically there is no real economical reason to develop them. It's an extremely complex problem and we have the great ability to alter environments as humans. So we can just alter environment to reduce obstacles and use wheels, which are simplistic.
Get a research grant for humanoid robotics research
>>8344080
Road paving is expensive you underestimate the load it would have on our infrastructure to have more wheeled vehicles around.
Also legs being evolved does not correlate to complexity. Computers we're originally a hired occupational role.
Damn ΔP, you scary.
>>8344051
Does this kill the crab?
>>8344086
imagine you squeezed you hand in a gap that small. Would your hand be broken?
>>8344087
The real question is why do the crabs keep crawling towards it?
I might have possibly inhaled a tiny bit of nitrogen dioxide. How fuck am I?
Reminds me of that time some retard slipped dihydrogen monoxide in my drink. Woke up in the hospital two days later.
I want to have natural light throughout the night. I theorized that I could make a tube of mirrors from a part of the world that has sunlight all the way to where I live. Is this at all possible? Theoretically speaking that is.
Yes, how do you think we see the moon?
>>8343899
I want to have a more powerful sunlight. Would it look like daytime light or no?
>>8343887
Sure, but why not just go straight to the source? Build some mirrors going from your house to the sun itself.
What are the best fields of Chemistry (either pure or applied) to specialize in? Analytical is boring and underpaying, and the orgo pharma bucks meme is saturated. I'm looking into nuclear chemistry, is that a good field? What other subfields are worth looking into?
I'm interested too, bump.
Interested also, bump
>>8343871
>no safety glasses
>no gloves
NICE PPE YOU GOT THERE
Checked the wiki didn't see anything about it
I'm interested in getting a telescope. Looking at the Orion SpaceProbe 3 EQ. Do you guys have any suggestions for ones to get or what to avoid? Budget is like $250, what I feel comfortable with as someone just starting out.
Bump, I'm looking into getting a telescope also within the same budget.
Don't forget to consider astronomy binoculars. But up to you.
>>8343990
I've heard binoculars are always good to have in addition to a telescope. Also been reading about eye pieces. Are eye pieces just modular? Like if one is 25mm can it be used in any telescope that uses 25mm?
May be getting ahead of myself. Still trying to research this. Especially the quality of individual products.
There are many people who back on this field to try and vindicate their arguments. So, what is the truth about psychology:
>Is it a science or not?
>Is it valid?
>Is it reliable?
>>8343844
It's like alchemy, a pseudo-science with mostly accidental glimpses of truth. It will eventually be replaced by something functional, objective and predictive and remembered only as a historical curiosity.
Psychometrics and IQ are the only large exception to the fact it is by its nature not reproducible and thus not science.
>>8343844
My school calls it Psychological Sciences. Emphasis on neurobiology (aka the physiology of behavior/emotion/blahblah)
What's your favorite and least favorite moon phase?
Can you rephrase the question?
>>8343826
What's your preference of moon shapes?
Best: Full
Worst: Gibbouses