Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 128. page

>>9122880
I'm not going to listen to all the shit if it's just 30 minutes of qualitative fluff.

You said that nothing crosses the event horizon. You also say that black holes compete for mass. How are those views compatible?

Also I assume you go on to say that the big bang started from a black hole, which it didn't.

>>9122892
Not op, but would it be possible that all mass of our current universe ends up in a single black hole?

After a point were only black hokes remain, and they start to pull each other towards a single point...

Nothing to vibrate = no entropy.

So, all mass and energy would be contained in a single "object".
(Assuming no hawking radiation)

Universe would now be timeless, spaceless.

Now, if this blackhole somehow become unstable and exploded, wouldn't this create a big bang?
(I know how ridiculous it sounds, black holes don't explode, specially if there is no time involved, I'm just being intellectually promiscuous)

>>9122892
>>You said that nothing crosses the event horizon. You also say that black holes compete for mass. How are those views compatible?

If I have a black hole with mass collecting around it's event horizon and not falling in, that layer of mass is also gravitational and it too will undergo gravitational collapse and it too will increase in mass as its gravity attracts more mass and thus it will produce its own black holes within its mass layer and the process repeats indefinitely. I've detailed this process before and it may have already been discovered separately in a process called Asymptotic darkness.


>
>Also I assume you go on to say that the big bang started from a black hole, which it didn't.

The universe is expanding which means that it gets smaller as we go backwards through time, at one time everything was all together in one place. If it was all together then it would have ultimately been below its Schwarzschild radius, and thus it must have been a black hole.

>>9122537
no

>>9122537
Noone know how to edit morphology. There are thousands of genes involved

>>9122592
>>9122669
Thank you for the answers. Love ya.

>>9122363
>that one kid that shows up an hour early
Me because I have jack shit to do this morning.

>That one student who is always 5 minutes late because she has no damn drive to get out of bed.

>>9122363
>that guy who comes in wearing the same clothes he wore yesterday
>that guy that sits near the front that asks too many questions
>that guy with the thinkpad laptop

File: IMG_3603.jpg (30KB, 236x347px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 236x347px

Tell someone trustworthy, like mark zuckerberg for example

>>9121848

The historical episode of Tartaglia vs. Cardano, aka the all-time biggest Scoop in the history of science, offers an instructive lesson if you are a person who is in any way active in the sciences and you also care about personal reputation, "getting credit", and so on:

Just put your ideas in the world. Do it ASAP, and immediately. I refer specifically to instantly broadcasting your ideas to the whole world and stamping your name on them just as soon as you have them. This is feasible with the internet, and circumvents the conventional route of the academic journal, which carries the benefit of people who will actually read and vet your thing so that it is actually /right/.

There is a tension here. If you do it TOO soon, then of course you run the risk of being /wrong/, and if you do this too many times, then you will earn a deserved reputation for being a poor scientist, or worse, a crank, or kook. OTOH, if you are too-secretive and too-jealously guard your knowledge (as was true of Tartaglia and other Italian mathematicians), then you know yourself: you will wish to prove your knowledge at some point, and it's only a matter of time until someone else figures out the trick by the context of interacting with those ideas that you do put into the public space.

Based upon the example of Tartaglia, I therefore incline towards the former idea, but then I'm not a PhD with a family to feed and so on, so there you go.

>>9121877
>Tartaglia vs. Cardano
Are there any modern examples?

I've been looking into the Riemann hypothesis myself, were I to come up with a solution I'm all but certain someone would attempt to steal it from me.

>>9121742
What's so bad about CS and math? Did you get bad grades?

>>9121742
Do whatever you want dude, you don't have to prove yourself to a Taiwanese towel-printing forum.

>>9121742
What exactly is stopping you from taking applied math classes?

Degree names are pretty much arbitrary. It's the classes you took that matter.

>>9121638
context is different.

Von Neumann was right btw.

>>9121638
MacArthur says "why not 65 years ago?"

Whoever strikes first is the bad guy.
I'm more worried about a false flag on either side (or nefarious 3rd party).

>thinking bombing solves any problems


Yeah, I think I'll listen to the modern Generals and Military Historians over some overrated Physicist hack

File: haha.jpg (41KB, 562x437px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 562x437px

>>9121499
>Drumpftards really will defend ANYTHING he does

>>9121505
What did he do this time?

>>9121507
Stared at the partial eclipse without glasses on during live news broadcasts.

at least you didnt give yourself permanent eye damage like most of this board

Fuck you /b/ GET

>>9121195
Give it time.

>small sample size (6 people)
>only 1 of the 6 had the results he wanted, he just ignored the rest
>test was never repeated
>didn't account for post-death sweating that results from the sudden rise in body temperature as the lungs stop cooling the body

what garbage research methods

>>9120964
so why can't we repeat today the experiment?

>>9120968

feel free

File: Prepare_5bc305_2384588.jpg (29KB, 400x412px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 400x412px

>>9120885
>Say we send a probe/ship into space
Probe Uranus

File: 18839263_1897179183881952_1773623333385838590_n.jpg (31KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 480x480px

>>9120897

speaking from a dude that spent all his 3 science courses studying the evolution of ginger, I'd say all we'd find is a shit ton of sulfuric ice.

>>9120714
planck*

How many fingers am I holding up?

>>9120714
Depends how many over 9,000. 10^42 over 9,000? Not blind at all. 10^45 over 9,000? Kinda blind. 10^46 over 9,000? Very blind.
>>9120723
*Planck

>>9120648
Is what a man says the ultimation of his soul?

>>9122169

No.

>>9122174
Then there's your answer.

nope, gonna have to put him down

Poor kitty

>>9120602
>help i held my cats head in place and made him stare at the sun now he wont stop walking into shit wwyd

Yes.

bumb

Yes.

Its OVER

>>9119638
Not on the East coast faggot

>>9119660
Oh
Find a black trash bag then