Faggots. N = L (1-d) Isolate and give formula for d. bet you cant.
>>8450106
d = icK
>>8450106
Divide by L. Square both sides. Expand right side. Do math.
Call op d = icK.
>>8450106
d = 1 - N/L
KYS
How is controlled the expression of the first homeotic gene if there is any other embryonary gene exprimed (and therefore there is not transcriptional factors) ?
Anyone? this is maybe a really stupid question but i'm really intrigued
>>8450080
Rephrase your question becaue people don't understand it; 'exprimed' is not the right word in that context.
cal3 is a joke, I'm kind of annoyed. they honestly could have condensed all of this into two courses instead of three
i think it is OK. leaves more space to discuss series and some analysis topics in first year. still, it's fucking boring to take.
that was the 4th class we had :(
1) Differentiation
2) Integration
3) Series and Sequences
4) Multidimensional integration
When we have a function how can we place an irrational number along either axis? I mean, if we have a cos(x) function we'll usually mark pi along the x-axis and -1 for the y-axis. But isn't the axis just a continuous number line? How can pi exist on a continuous number line? Irrational numbers are not just decimal approximations.
>>8449985
>How can pi exist on a continuous number line?
How can't it?
You just draw stuff. Of course, you can bound the expansion of pi after the 10^x decimal and get down to distances small as atoms, something you can't resolve in reality.
The reals are merely a model for space. The assumption that our world is a manifold with a commutative coordinate function algebra is also just a physical assumption, there may not even by "points".
>>8449991
Because if we got infinitesimally close to 3.141592... we could always add decimals but we would never reach the value of pi - only approximations of it. I'm quite new to proper mathematics to be honest so I'm not explaining myself very clearly. Basically I just don't understand how irrationals - which as I understand are not just decimal approximations of numbers - can be represented on a continuous number line built around representing decimals
Does anyone know how to do these? Have a whole sheet of practice problems like this and can't for the life of me figure a single one of them out?
Can someone who's actually good at maths give me an explanation or something to help me get started?
Cheers lads
>>8449968
Holy shit is it possible to be this dumb?
Sage, belongs is sqt
>>8449968
Stupid questions thread?
How was this integrated?
>>8450031
The integral of 1/x is lnx
Why is x / 7 roughly approximate to 14 * x / 100?
saged
because 1/7 ~ 14/100
>>8449950
because 7 8 9
What are some common misconceptions when it comes to probability or random phenomena?
I'm going to be doing a small study on my senior students (I teach high school) and I wanted to examine what are some of their biggest misconceptions and how I can start addressing these.
Any teachers here?
>>8449938
If it's just high-school, then a great one is that one problem with the three doors and goats.
They fail to account for the fact that "He will always choose a door with a goat behind it" is valid and relevant information, completely changing the odds of your decisions.
>>8449945
Yep just high school seniors. I teach students that don't really have a strong interest in the subject, just want a credit in their senior year. The class is mostly ACT Prep and just general life skills math.
We will be looking at the monty hall problem though. That's a good one :)
That everything has probability of 1/2 cuz it either happens or not
How can i solve the toggle mechanism?
Is there a single loop equation or do I solve it as two mechanisms (four bar crank rocker mechanism and crank slider)
Is the movement of the box simple and harmonic?
t. Physicists.
>>8449907
It's a prismatic kinematic pair
t. Engineer
>>8449896
isn't the bar between the radii changing length?
which one of you faggots is responsible for this
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1610.03452v1.pdf
>>8449866
the authors are listed at the top brainlet
>A Longitudinal Measurement Study
what the fuck does that even mean?
Can someone explain to me how light works? It has no mass, yet it's attracted by black holes. If it has mass, how is it able to go the speed of light? I thought things with mass couldn't go the speed of light?
>>8449808
Great thread! This will help me brush up on my meme understanding of general relativity. If you asked me over the Summer I would have been able to answer you probably because I was reading Kip Thorne's book: Black Holes and Time Warps.
>>8449808
Electromagnetic radiation. Gravity affects it because gravity is the curvature of spacetime and light travels through spacetime.
>>8449808
this should clear things up for you
[math]R_{\mu \nu} - \tfrac{1}{2}R \, g_{\mu \nu} + \Lambda g_{\mu \nu} = \frac{8 \pi G }{c^4} T_{\mu \nu}[/math]
This follows from the field axioms (next post).
Can the axioms be fixed so that [math](-1)(-1)=-1[/math] (next next post)?
>>8449781
Reference:
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/FieldAxioms.html.
>>8449781
[math](-1)=(-1)1[/math] (3)
[math]=(-1)(-1)(1/(-1))[/math] ([math]1=(-1)(1/(-1))[/math]) (4)
[math]=(-1)(1/(-1))[/math] ([math](-1)(-1)=-1[/math])
[math]=1[/math]
What do now?
(-1)^2 = -1 is true in characteristic two but not in any other characteristic
what do you mean by 'fixing the axioms'? you would no longer be working in a general field if you forced (-1)^2=-1.
>his imaginary unit is not cursive
>>8449762
I try to but it always ends up looking worse
like an upside down curly v
>his x is not cursive
>writing [math]\frac{\delta y}{\delta x}[/math] instead of [math]\frac{\partial y}{\partial x}[/math]
>Fuck you Navient I currently owe $78k for Phd in computer science from UCLA.
>he isn't a trust fund baby
debt: 0$
Britbong here, I owe around £30,000
>>8449747
Atiyah comes through with another solution to a long unsolved problem, proving the non-existence of a complex structure on [math] S^6 [/math]:
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1610.09366.pdf
What is /sci/ reading? What problems are you working/stuck on? Progress on research/theses?
why is grothedieck bald
>>8449671
To keep the government out
>>8449662
do we have confirmation that Atiyahs proof is accepted or not?
The dude is getting old and his abstract seems to suggest he didn't need any new ideas to solve it. Seems strange that the proof would of been missed for this long.
If you could send a post-it note back to the past to young Albert Einstein
what would you write on it to start him off?
Dear jewish little cunt
Please support hitler he is our only hope to advance science and make humanity progress.
>>8449655
Remember to look for connections between the speed of light and time. Remember America has fast food.
mup da doo didda po mo gub bidda be dat tum mufugga bix nood cof bin mo fugga.
also
the universe is kill.