There are people on this board RIGHT NOW - and in fact there's plenty of them, not just one or two weirdos - who ACTUALLY and completely UNFACETIOUSLY went to vote. That's right. They went to vote.
I cannot for the life of me find an example of MORE BASIC MATH than
> one divided by SIXTY FUCKING MILLION is a statistically negligible number
This obvious fact is not a factor in all these people's reasoning.
How does that make you feel?
wow op u r so smart hehe xddd what a patrician hehehehe fuck the plebs amirite xddddddddd us mathematicians amirite?
>>8465086
> it takes ~1 minute for a mindless libcuck on /sci to get triggered and announce it
Good to know.
What are the most Important topics to learn about besides physics? Thanks!
>>8464927
Computer science.
>>8464927
>>8465313
What is the point of studying pure maths or physics if your IQ isn't above 150? You will never make discoveries or become world renowned with your inferior IQ. Just do engineering or computer science and call it a day.
>>8464704
No point in studying pure maths in general, unless you want to be an autistic cuck faggot
>>8464704
>implying
t IQ 115 at most
>>8464789
Rude af!
>>8464704
Who is this cum drum?
Where were you when statistics stopped being a STEM?
>>8464647
What's his name again?
>>8464647
He is a massive fag, and he is truly BTFO.
Stats has been passed by modeling. AI modeling and the Primary Model predicted the outcome correctly.
Polling and statistics are just a means for the media to favour its favourite candidate now.
Fuck Nate Copper and his shitty math. Go back to school Nate.
>>8464833
Nate Lead
Do you think large cells have circulatory systems and "heartbeats"?
>>8464270
No, because I'm not mentally retarded.
>>8464280
Why would thinking that cells have synchronized transport capabilities confined to specific pathways be retarded?
I think the better question is, do multi cellular animals the size of unicellular amoeba have a circulatory system and heartbeat?
Seriously, how does something this small even function?
Only a few more hours until america is made great again!
But seriously, lets get to the point.
If Donald Trump wins the presidential election, what scientific advances can we hope to see?
Not many since he plans to cut funding to NASA's earth science departments.
A total war under Hillary would lead to greater scientific progress
He's too busy collecting money to be interesting in things
why is it in leibniz notation a second derivative is noted as
d^2y/dx^2
and not
d^2y/d^2x ?
Because d/dx is the operator. When you apply it twice you get what everyone uses.
>>8465388
so it's squaring the operator, which i understand through d^2y, but how is it with respect to x^2? doesn't that imply your variable has to be second order?
>>8465405
(d/dx)(d/dx)=d^2/(dx)^2
There you go.
Does anybody have a good collection of published research supporting/opposing global warming? And if supporting, proposed solutions. I really can't make a decision on this topic until I read more, but I don't know where to start.
>>8465029
Wikipedia. The consensus for solutions right now is damage control. Too late to stay within the normal climate cycle, but the degree of deviation can be minimized with immediate action.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate_change_mitigation
>>8465029
>I really can't make a decision on this topic until I read more
>99% of scientists agreeing doesnt convince me
>Im a skeptic
sure thing buddy, but Ill just call you retard all the same. also if 99% of scientific consensus isnt going to convince you, literally nothing will
>>8465034
>the degree of deviation can be minimized with immediate action.
dude, TRUMP won. Digest that for a bit. The guy who said global warming was a chinese hoax.
literally every last bit of fossil fuels will be burned and blown into the atmosphere. we are going for maximum damage and there is nothing anyone can do about it
HP-50g
TI89
TI84
Why is HP-50g better than the rest?
Nspire is the best calculator
>>8465036
I never understood why anyone would need a CAS calculator.
Why not just use a computer instead?
>>8465040
This.
Hi /sci/ if our universe is always expanding is there a centre point?
Also if its expanding will it eventually reach a point where it collapses on itself? Could it be possible that there was possibly another universe before us and the big bang was caused by the universe collapsing, not being able to expand any further?
No center point. Any finite amount of space is expanding. Infinite space is becoming less matter-dense.
Space is expanding beyond the escape velocity of the gravity of all matter in the universe, there will be no big crunch.
>center point
No
>Collapse
No
>Cyclic Universe
No
The universe is infinite, now take time to understand what the word "infinite" means, and how it applies to this context.
>is there a centre point?
all mass has a center
Daily reminder that this man will extend our lifespans by 2036, and eventually lead humanity to eternal youth. Why have you not donated to the SENS foundation yet? Don't get fucked over by aging just because some memers tell you that "it's 100% natural we can't stop it".
>>8464778
I wish I never found about this life extension meme, now I'm just going to be left disappointed. Hopefully I'm wrong.
>>8464905
I found about it several years ago in a science magazine that talked about the 10 keys of aging according to him.
Was there any progress on this?
>>8464778
He does fucking nothing except raise money. Why would I want to live longer now that trump is president
Yo sci can you give me some cool subjects like Fermi paradox or Kessler syndrome
Preferably related to space out astronomy
>fermi
>>>/x/
Fucking pop-sci normie. You want a good topic? Differential geometry.
>>8464800
this
Is this even remotely correct?
>>8464333
>History is rewritten and used merely as a tool to influence how people view the present
>Religion is excluded from the public square
Only fedoras think that way
>>8464333
This is just a very wordy strawman
>>8464353
I agree. The author uses most terms wrong or terms that are dog whistles for the religious right. (metanarrative, evolution, social disease, moral relativity...) They seem to be chosen for their colloquial newspeak.
It is peppered with religious dogma from an evangelical Christian point of view, not theological arguments from all religion.
("propositional revelation from God", "building blocks for higher criticism of the Bible.")
Bullshit strawman, and "No true Scotsman" with false dichotomies, and 'making a beggaring of the question'. (separation of the sacred from the secular)
Delete this thread...
So this guy:
>Has a 5.0 GPA
>Scored a 2100 on the SAT
>Got accepted into every ivy league school
>Plays baseball
>Plays 3 instruments
What's your excuse now?
>>8464315
hes a nigger
>>8464331
Exactly, a nigger did that and you can't.
>>8464315
its almost like the difference in IQ spouted by /pol/ is marginal at the extreme ends of the scale.
I recently finished James Stewart's Precalculus, I know I should move onto calculus but I'm not sure which book to use. I was wondering if any of you could give recommendations based of your experience with a certain book, thank you all in advance.
you could just stay the course and stick with stewart, but he's pretty unpopular here because his calculus text isn't an analysis text in disguise.
>>8464263
I've heard plenty of people on this board say that Stewart's book is not good if you are studying math for math and nothing else, is this true or is it just a lie? Would it be best for me to use this as some sort of introduction to calculus the use another text that is more proof based than application based?
>>8464276
I learned Calculus with Stewart's book. Is it good enough? Yes, sure. Are there better books? Definitely.