Was he really a great scientist? Or he is remembered mostly for his sassiness?
>>8496513
>Was he really a great scientist? Or he is remembered mostly for his sassiness?
Both. They;re not contradictory.
He actually was pretty damn good.
>tfw no measure on continuous path spaces but path integrals work anyway
Big fuck you to mathematicians.
sassy science man of his day
Do you guys think cannabis oil can be effective in treating/killing cancer cells?
>>8496507
No.
t. someone who's seen a guy with lung cancer use it and die
Bumping for a reply
>>8496511
What was the dosage amount he was taking
what if someone double majored in cs + stats
then it's not a joke, right? not a meme? not a goofy gaff? or should they double major in PURE MATHEMATICS
Basically what I did. Except it was CS+Data Science.
Now I can work anywhere doing anything.
>studying cs
>ever
Good joke, anon.
>>8495667
it's pretty good at a top 5 university, anywhere else though I wouldn't be doing it
How can it be that Universe has supposedly existed forever? That it has no actual beginning? Surely that's just about something we haven't come about yet? Makes less sense than quantum ''anything'' combined.
>>8495134
Yeah well tell me where does a circle start?
Or where do numbers start?
Or if it didn't exist forever, what was that stuff before it? Or if it didn't exist forever, what caused it to form?
You are asking too easy questions. Move forward.
of our current understanding of the universe, as I am to understand it, there must've always been some medium of existance, even though virtual particles can spontaneously come into existance, and spacetime itself can expand, there still needs to be some basis of reality that has existed perpetually. Perhaps time wasnt even a factor of the universe until a bakers dozen of billions of years ago.
Can the universe collapse, or does it expand continuously forever? If the universe could collapse, then wouldn't it be possible that the universe itself has gone through infinite phases of collapse and expansion?
Is UBC considered a good grad school?
Why is engineering before physics?
>>8495014
For what? A lot of less prestigious schools outrank ivies in certain fields when it comes to grad schools but it varies by department.
>>8495014
A good grad school for which field?
How astronauts can survive space radiation in a joureney to mars or the moon????
artificial magnetic field
>>8493993
what about 1969, how NASA protected the astronauts back then???
>>8494014
theres a reason they are all dead now
Who here has or is pursuing a Ph.D and when in your life did you decide you were going to pursue one?
>>8493576
>when
from childhood b/c both parents have the degree
>what happened
I passed my courses, seminar, qualifying exam, and published three first author papers in a pretty good journal and then dropped out of a PhD program b/c I'm "mentally ill".
Now I'm unemployed, drink heavily, and shitpost.
(No I will not provide additional information.)
>>8493589
>(No I will not provide additional information.)
not even your field of study?
>>8493576
>Who here has (...) a Ph.D
Yup.
>when in your life did you decide you were going to pursue one?
At the end of my Bachelor's I suppose, though it wasn't a decision that was made at one point in time but rather one that evolved over some time. I sort of just rolled into science.
I did a long internship at the end of my Bachelor's, and over the course of that project I realized I actually like doing science (neuroscience). I continued with a research Master's program, got a job as a research assistant during that program, and my boss at the time recommended me to one of her collaborators who was looking for a PhD student. I applied, got the job, and that was that. Now I'm a post-doc.
What would you do if your brain was this big.
>>8492508
die
>>8492508
get on my level
shitpost on /x/
Has science and physics ever been so completely BTFO by a single piece of hardware as in this case, /sci/?
It's literally just a copper tube with a metal plate at the end, and yet it's completely blown apart centuries of understanding.
What went wrong, /sci/?
>>8491283
My Grandfather smoked his whole life. I was about 10 years old when my mother said to him, 'If you ever want to see your grandchildren graduate, you have to stop immediately.'. Tears welled up in his eyes when he realized what exactly was at stake. He gave it up immediately. Three years later he died of lung cancer. It was really sad and destroyed me. My mother said to me- 'Don't ever smoke. Please don't put your family through what your Grandfather put us through." I agreed. At 28, I have never touched a cigarette. I must say, I feel a very slight sense of regret for never having done it, because this thread gave me cancer anyway.
>What went wrong, /sci/?
They thought a guy from the 17th century was correct.
>>8491283
this
will
forever
be
a
meme
>>8492216
Fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck no.
And heck, I probably would not even teach university students unless I could teach a room of Dr. Terence Tao's wife's sons who would immediately get concepts and wouldn't ask me dumb shit.
I would teach them to fuck but that's about it.
i wouldnt make a good job
Have you ever hear that story that your body has completely different cells or atoms (depending on the story) every 7 years? That they recycle and so on. People use this as some analogy on why life can be different in self-help books and so on, but disregard that.
I don't think it comes from scientific sources at all (am I wrong?), but I also think it doesn't make much sense in any case. Is there a way to calculate that kind of volatile behaviour? I mean, I create and excrete new cells everyday, fluids flow, minerals move, and so on. But it's not as simple as that as I regenerate this and that material, or that cells take place of another in an organic way. At the level of the atomic, there is no such individuality that can be perceived. Electrons are not balls, but fields of possibilities, right? In that sense, an atom exchanging electrons with another atom and therefore changing themselves cannot be called to be the same or different from the ones before. They didn't go away or entered your body at all.
If I put a glass of water on a table, I can observe it drying out over the days, therefore water molecules escape the glass and fly away. However, can I even say that the exact same atoms will be there throughout the whole time until it dries?
Does it make sense?
Mmm, pancakes.
So what happens if you upload your mind to a computer? Does your consciousness transfer over or is it copied and you're killed on the human end?
>>8496285
Your subjective experience does not carry over to a copy of your brain
How did words come to have the definitions that they have? And how did definition come to have the definition that it has.
Well, it sure as hell didn't happen overnight.
>>8496161
>what is a snarglebam?
>point to the snarglebam.
>there, that is a snarglebam
>>8496168
How did "what" "is" "a" "point" "to" "the" "there" "that" come to have the definitions that they have?
What is the highest possible idea/question man can contemplate?
And why do geniuses settle to study things less than the highest-possible idea/question?
Grothendiek spent most of his youth thinking about properties of shapes and numbers, but gave that up as he got old and started thinking about more important things.
Von Neumann could multiply digits really fast, impressive, but when he came to the end of his life he was extremely afraid of death and didn't know how to cope. He spent too much time thinking about inferior ideas, instead of contemplating the highest idea. Naturally he would panic and be anxious in the face of death, huh.
>>8496031
What the fuck? There is no ''highest possible thing'' to think about. People just are drawn to different things, by nature or nurture I don't know.
>>8496031
>What is the highest possible idea/question man can contemplate?
The one you subjectively value the most.
>>8496031
This is the most autistic thread I have ever seen on /sci/
The infinite monkey theory does it reach 100% or just very close to it?
>"""""""""""theory"""""""""""
>>8495961
the infinite monkey theorem says that an ape that tips infinetly often on a keyboard will eventually write every book there exists. to proof that you can calculate the probability of pushing a button and then define a sequence of finite blocks (a book has finite letters) of independent incidences (that a letter is typed). those blocks are independent and the infinite sum of their probability converges to infinity. then the lemma of borel-cantelli gives you the result that the monkey will type every book (even) infinitely often almost everywhere with probability 1 (100%). since convergence almost everywhere is a very strong expression you might say that it is "100% true".
>>8495961
It's not just that the infinite monkey theory writes Shakespeare once. They write Shakespeare an infinite number of times.
>Jansci Von Neumann
>"loved to study and work while listening to extremely loud German Marching music to the point of infuriating his wife and neighbors"
>jew...listening to nazi music
#1 Was Von Neumann insane?
#2 Is listening to extremely loud German Marching Music good for your brain/IQ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u1sEt3NjHNA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5x0JQuIoBcE
>German matching music
>Nazi music
open a book kiddo
>>8495949
>implying you wouldn't listen to this all day
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-b5X69vREAg
>>8495967
>commie hammer and sickle logo
sorry not gonna open that virus.