Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 1120. page

File: oldschool.jpg (33KB, 401x400px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 401x400px

In reference to {Source A}, I will now show axioms for each number in the form of Hard Problems.
A point, or, a circle; the descript. THE UNIVERSAL HARD PROBLEM, "a factor is understood logically or creatively"; further, all existence is a point in time, or part of nature, not the duet (i.e. never a point in time and part of nature).
Opposite, and polar; THE VIOLENT HARD PROBLEM. You may not know another, 100%, only 3/4. We are opposite and polar, when you and another connect, you both remain different.
triangular; CREATING A HARD PROBLEM. Simple. "Simple" is the hard problem, and it is possible to answer if you try.
the square; HARD PROBLEM IN A HARD PROBLEM. Complexity. You need Number 5 to understand 4, and Number 6 to acknowledge 4. 4, is understood when Number 3 is acknowledged.
agent of a quartet; A HARSH HARD PROBLEM. Effort is required to discover, "4, is understood when Number 3 is acknowledged" - an answer. There are many configurations of Number 3.
(An explanation is not provided; 6 is kept secret. "Naught. screw" is creativity to hint). NO HARD PROBLEM.
corrival for the root digit; HARD PROBLEM OF HARD PROBLEMS. To know Number 1 to 6, is to acknowledge 7.
(An explanation is not provided; 8 is not a number but a symbol that comes after Number 7) A EASY HARD PROBLEM. If Number 7 is acknowledged, you learned. What you had learned is pleasurable or painful - it comes naturally (i.e. no effort is required).
9 and 10 are false numbers; mathematics as language, and language as mathematics; misunderstanding Number 8, and repetition of the same Number 7.


A joke: You know... How captcha works...

Truf

I got my swagga back, truf.

>women

>>8523169
seconded.

>>8523169
amen, don't need any of that.

>>8522948
checkmate atheists

Parallel worlds?
The consequences of this are incalculable

What am I looking at?

>inb4 le muh pics from space meme

>>8522938
horizon

Truth is overrated.

What predictions does your model make that are not present in and/or simpler to find than the currently accepted model?

Looks like a population growth problem or a statistics/thermo problem

>>8522827
Its about the watermelonine levels on different crops of watermelons and you are a nigger

>>8522827

minimisation of free energy using variational bayes

>>8522776
I've had this thought too. Pretty interesting.

File: Screenshot_20161207-133846.png (388KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

388KB, 1440x2560px

Its subtraction just like red and yellow picatature related

>>8522776
Your eyes have Red, Blue, and Green cones. So it's easy for your brain to imagine Purple as a combination because it IS a combination. It's a bit harder for your brain to imagine Orange as a combination but it's still possible because it's still a combination of Green cones and Red cones. Imagining Green as a combination is impossible because according to our eyes (and brain) it just IS.

>>8522517
Sauce

>>8522517
who dis?

>>8522517
What's the story behind this? What the fuck

Does this hold up?

Concavity changes at relative extrema.

>>8522371
Concavity changes at points of inflection.

>>8522275
How about you get a job you waste of a perfectly functional brain.

>>8522275
>I've always ate well
I doubt it.
Do you eat enough food that stimulates hormesis?
>How do you become as smart as possible?
I don't think you can. You can become more knowledgable or learn new skills, sure.

>>8522275
smarter people use their brains less actually, the key is not to waste your energy on autistic mental functions but to give yourself proper rest and figure out how to be more efficient when the time comes to solve some real problems

basically now that you've replaced your shit habits with more intellectually engaging habits, now you have to replace your intellectually engaging habits with intellectually preservative habits

this includes contemplation, creative thought, and productive output

>>8522021
Maybe /fit/ can help you better that /sci/, lad.
Here, we don't even know how to [math]gain[/math] muscle mass.

>>8522021
easy, just do more aerobic exercise; alot of running naturally you will lose muscle mass the longer distances you run and if you do fast interval training (very fast but not fast or short distance enough for a sprint e.g. 200 - 1000m in multiple reps at pace.) but also do long runs; work your way up to like 7 mile runs

>>8522040
>work your way up to like 7 mile runs
This suggestion could be spot on.
I rarely go past 3 miles and I focus on some light jog and 50, 100 m sprints.
I'll schedule 7 miles twice a week as soon as my calf pain goes away.
I've put my body under too much stress with all this fucking weight.
Not used to.

the only thing i want derived are my categories

what's the difference from deriving and differentiating? better yet why call it a derivative and not a differential?

>>8521434
A differential is the little "d" in the [math] \frac{ dy}{dx} [/math]

>>8521233
this is an 18+ website
come back in 13 years and I'll tell you

>>8521233
Tapestries sell for 50bucks and some even 1000. Fractal tapestries sell for more. Those are the big deals about fractals.

>>8521233
dude acid lmao

Yes, kinda.

If the engines are running the plane still needs to gain enough momentum to take off. This can be achieved by lengthening to conveyor belt enough so the plane has room to gain speed and begin to lift. With such a system, since the plane has wheels, you don't need a conveyerbelt at all and instead can just have a traditional runway.

The plane lifts because of air moving by the wings really fast, not because of the wheels spinning really fast

>>8521044
As stated, assuming frictionless wheels, vacuum, spherical cows etc, etc, then the following happens:

The wheels and the treadmill instantaneously accelerate to light speed. The plane attempts to accelerate forward, but cannot move because its wheels now have infinite speed and thus infinite mass.

>>8521044

No, bernoulli's principal dictates that it cannot.

Any other answers are meme/troll bullshit.

Any and all aircraft require the pressure generated from the shape/speed of the wing to create upward lift. By mirroring the speed of the aircraft in the exact opposite way, the relative speed of the plane is 0mph. Thus, no lift can be created.

Unless there is some sort of outside force like a hurricane headwind, that plane isn't doing shit besides running in place.

in the context of limits, it could mean everything

File: jew.jpg (120KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 1920x1080px

>>8520769
THAT"S AN INDETERMINATE FORM, DON"T THINK TOO HARD ABOUT IT, GOY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>>8520769
>falling for the infinity meme

Good goy

>>8520768
Okay fuck off, real analysis isn't that hard. Stop trying to convince me I can't do it

File: Evariste_galois.jpg (24KB, 220x284px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 220x284px

>>8520768
tfw you'll never be a 20-year-old frenchman developing new maths that established mathematicians couldn't even understand for several decades. :(

>look up galois theory on youtube
holy shit i've been saying it wrong this whole time. i thought it was gah-low-is