Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 1089. page

>>8537674
do you think Emily S. is a real person? she's so cute
How much does it cost per hour to talk to a tutor?

File: file.png (173KB, 1093x687px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 1093x687px

>>8537680
Forget about her, its all about Anastasia.

File: 1481642623888.jpg (259KB, 937x960px) Image search: [Google]

259KB, 937x960px

>tfw not a brainlet

File: 1481639490937.jpg (149KB, 937x960px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 937x960px

>>8536332
Saw this on /b/. Posting the simplest answer.

Compile notes for future reference. Review/get ahead with Khan academy. Hookers and blow.

>>8535571
I'm using the time to catch up on my reading.

Undergraduate research.

Helium tank straight to your mouth, keep until you pass out, you'll wake up with a lower voic e

check /b/ for their crystal forming recipes

Produce ethanol via fermentation and then distill it / dry it

>>8540123
That the volume is completely made out of the thing you measured as being a million ppm.

For example OP is a million ppm of faggotry.

>>8540123
Anything is a million ppm of itself

Really makes you think...

>>8540503
Wow, just like everything is base 10 in base itself. I wonder if that's connected...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del,_Escher,_Bach

>>8539985
It's a meme.
Like the Euler equation.

>>8539985
>>8540061
is right, it's all a meme.

infinity

I'm done with this board

They say a group is only as smart as it's dumbest member, so the IQ of science is probably in the low 70s or high 60s.

Pick a book on a topic that interests you. Read the whole thing. Pick another book. Read that one. Continue. That's basically it. Go look at the wiki to find good ones.

You don't get automatically smarter doing anything passively. You have to actively work for it.

>>8539864
>Do i automatically get smarter by browsing this board?
> im trying my hardest to get good enough at math to study pharmacology
The label "meat head" really does suit you

>>8539875
>>8539877
Was joking about the "automatically" part obviously.

So reading books about math would help me out yea?

>>8539772
>repel everyone, even yourself

>>8539772
Third one it's wrong. Next.

>>8539772
It does. Why do you think it never stops moving?

Most don't work (placebo) or have very negligible effects. The chemicals with potent effects have long term negative impact on your mind and body. Chemical enhancement without the discipline to use it will not improve your chances of success.

If you want more information on cognitive enhancement, read published, peer-reviewed research papers/clinical research, not some flunky sales-people pitch promising the new wonder drug for peak performance.

>>8539126
One word: amphetamines

>>8539126
Nootropics are actually dangerous in certain scenarios (not uncommon ones).
However it's not generally documented because they're given to old dying fucks, and you can't tell if it's Alzheimer's worsening or anything else.

I looked into doing nootropics myself few years ago. Looking back I can tell that they wouldn't solve anything, because my lack of concentration was the result of other problems (depression, lack of exercise and bad diet).

My suggestion is to only use Nootropics if you have prooven, physical brain damage. Otherwise start eating well, take some vitamin B's and Ω-3s, and do some cardio.

File: image.jpg (139KB, 2048x1361px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 2048x1361px

>>8538921
>teached

>>8538921
Journals dont work as a textbook.
Visit the wiki

>>8539150
So how do they work?!

Yes. It is called lobotomy.

>>8538595
>could I just one day have brain surgery and have a friends, a girlfriend, a decent job, and a body that isn't a cage the next?
Why can't you have them?

>>8538595
>Can I totally rewire my neurology.
No, you twat.

Stat101 take-home final detected

>>8538325
all dice have a six

1/(6^3)

you got 85% and only received a 3.0?
What's considered a failing mark then?

>>8538269
Precalc is basically a course to weed out people who are lazy or have an IQ below 105 so that enough spots in Calc I are open for people ""smart"" enough for it.

>>8538271
and Calc 1 is basically a course to weed out people who are lazy or have an IQ below 110 so that enough spots in Calc 2 are open for people ""smart"" enough for it, which is basically a course to weed out people who are lazy or have an IQ below 115 so that enough spots in Calc 3 are open for people ""smart"" enough for it, which is basically a course to weed out people who are lazy or have an IQ below 120 so that enough spots in DiffEq and Linear Algebra are open for people ""smart"" enough for it, which is basically a course to weed out people who are lazy or have an IQ below 125 so that enough spots in Real Analysis are open for people ""smart"" enough for it, which is basically a course to weed out people who are lazy or have an IQ below 130 so that enough spots in actual mathematics courses are open for people smart enough for it.

>>8537734
People generally don't believe that P=NP, the problem is that no one has thus far been able to formulate a solid proof that P!=NP

>>8537734

Because every time we though a complexity class doesn't equal another without proof, we've been wrong.

L=NL=P=NP

>>8537734

The world sure sucks when there are people as dumb as Donald Knuth living in it, huh?