Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 1009. page

>>8585001
You fuckers are still doing this shit?

Fuck off OP there are countless explanations and examples for this.

No its 2/3

>>8585009
Read the post again anon
The monty hall problem - ie, stay or switch - is 1/3 to 2/3. This is empirically proven.

But the exact same series of events - with the only difference being the second question is "pick a door" (which is not dependent on the original decision in any way) - is a 50/50 chance because your first decision is not relevant to the probability calculations.

The outcome of the first decision is always one goat door being opened. You have no influence over this outcome. No matter what door you pick, this outcome will always be the same. Your decision was not important.

The only reason the first decision is counted in the probability calculations is that "stay or switch" is relative to the first decision.

When you eliminate any link to the first decision in the question (ie "pick a door"), there are no longer any ties to the first decision and it should be disregarded entirely from the probability calculations.

This is no longer the monty hall problem, but an identical series of events with a different question being asked

>>8584984
Only old people are using it though.

>>8584994
True

>>8584984
Only old people are using it though.

>>8584799
I hate numbers so much

[eqn]
\left[r^2 \partial_r^2 + r \left({3\over \ln r}-2 i \cot\theta \right) \partial_r + \partial_\theta^2 + i\left({3\over \ln r}-2 i \cot\theta - 1 \right)\partial_\theta\right]\,F(r, \theta) = A\, F(r,\theta)
[/eqn]
[math] A [/math] is constant and [math] r [/math] and [math] \theta [/math] are on the unit disk.

For those of you who think you can solve it on the first go - think again.

>>8584805
how do you get the LaTeX/MathML on here?

Same number of chromosomes.

>>8584678
>>8584687
This.

Anyway, you can't dispute it, since Europeans and Asians HAVE Neanderthal DNA.

>>8584695

I get that, but a species is often defined the major subdivision of a genus or subgenus, regarded as the basic category of biological classification, composed of related individuals that resemble one another, are able to breed among themselves, but are not able to breed with members of another species.

>are not able to breed with members of another species.

there is temperature
there is no heat
cold is the abssence of heat, therefor it is cold in space, cold in the bottom of the ocean aso.

>>8584601
Yes but the temperature is a property of atoms...

And there is no atoms in the space...

>>8584604
Nigger, space isn't a perfect vaccum, for a perfect vaccum you couldn't even have photons.

File: you.gif (443KB, 480x238px) Image search: [Google]

443KB, 480x238px

N=1

File: p=np_1.png (655KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

655KB, 1920x1080px

>>8584537
>Proof of P = NP ladies and gentleman

File: P=NP_2.png (303KB, 603x511px) Image search: [Google]

303KB, 603x511px

>>8584537
>>8584544
>Proof of P = NP ladies and gentleman
https://warosu.org/sci/thread/S8581192

>>>>>>>>>/x/

>>8584397

The Chilean government ruled out most conventional explanations. I'm curious if /sci/ can crack the mystery.

>>8584392
Its exhaust is really dense.

>>8584361
full body transplant

>>8584361
Fuck off, hypochondria-anon.

>>8584363
tell me more anon

i'll try anything

>>8584339
Yeah.


It's called finding your own reason.

>>8584339
no, which is why the reason to live is to find a reason to live

>>8584358
but I can't think of any reason to find a reason to live

>>8584330
When I need more money I just go to vegas, put $10000 on red. If I win, I leave (I made a profit). If I lose, I put my net losses on red and repeat. Gauranteed win.

>>8584337
:*(

>>8584330
Might work for horse racing since a lot of the horses are of the same bloodlines, fed and trained the same, etc. Its not a good idea for other sports without consideration of a fuckload of variables including day to day stats on the individual athletes because you'll probably train your algorithm to just always bet on whoever is winning instead of what makes them winners, such as training regimen, staying clean in season, proper sleep, not facing off the field/court drama, raw athleticism, age, their sports IQ for their position, their ability to work in a team, status on their relationship with coaches and teammates, if the coach has anything going with them,...

Way too many variables that can screw things up, and if you use something as simple as box scores and season stat sheets for things like passing yards or sacks, you won't be able to pick winners. Closest you'll get is being able to know for sure when some team is about to get BTFO by another team that completely out classes them all around.

Would be interesting though if you train it to browse news outlets and twitter profiles of athletes to try and get a read on if they're mentally there week to week for a game.

>>8584322
>Read title
>ebin

>>8584322
The inherent nature of the subject makes it nearly impossible to define objectively. Given that the paper it seems incredibly reasonable. I only briefly skimmed it, but none of the language or argumentation is particularly troubling or biased in any way. And the methodology is very clearly laid out, with no signs of manipulation. And the material is presented very matter of factly without making reaching conclusions.

This is a much more interesting read because the analysis is more palpable.

https://www.thenation.com/article/this-political-theorist-predicted-the-rise-of-trumpism-his-name-was-hunter-s-thompson/

>>8584322
>but I think they left out a lot of potential interaction terms in their model

What do you feel they left out they should have included?

>>8584313
lmao

>>8584313
Lol no. If space is quantized it's not like a road network, it's like pixels. That more or less preserves pi.

>>8584313
yes that's exactly what it means.

muh dick desu

Consciousness is being aware, what kind of awareness depends on the situation manifested around the individual, neuroplasticty can be a good answer to how consciousness is produced since you are more conscious today then you were when you were an eight year old. The answer is yes to your last question, but consciousness for computers will be artificial for the next few hundred years. But to be quite honest, computers may actually pass conscious awareness that humans have. Unique world we live in huh?

File: 1473957733278.jpg (31KB, 480x547px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 480x547px

>>8584307
Using an OP image like that tells us that you're another one of those mentally ill >>>/x/ crossboarders that believes in mysticism

>>8584246
Metric as in metric spaces or Riemannian manifolds?

The former you should have no problem with, the latter is out of your reach for now.

>>8584262
The former I think. does discussion of L1, L2 and Minkowski space fall under that category?

>>8584266
yes yes no

four and three simultaneously
/thread

>>8584152
1 because it's the first container the other containers have to wait in line before getting their drink

>>8584152
4.