Continuing from >>17692039 with some Taylor Vixen (ca. 2009)
Wrong thread? Anyway I just got around better Internet access for a while so I'm going to start uploading some full sets. Starting with this set of Jelena Jensen that was requested in >>17687990
Jelena Jensen, Digital Desire set #10616 (19 Oct 2008)
7z password: 4chan
Requested in the same thread:
Sabrina Maree, Digital Desire set #11010 (1 Oct 2009)
Ulya I (Klodi Monsoon), Met-Art, "Lexivia" (9 Sep 2007)
mega.nz \ #!VCJhlR4B!1lkqKQx5MxsHA87BRjK_CaLSg9-uSX7p93tKQ-a0iyo
Taylor Vixen, Digital Desire set #10901 (21 Apr 2009)
Lindsey Lee, Digital Desire set #10843 (16 Feb 2010)
Alexis Adams (Jordana Ryan), Digital Desire set #11497 (10 Sep 2013)
Alice Lighthouse, Digital Desire set #50031 (1 Feb 2016)
Dillion Harper, Digital Desire set #11863 (26 Jun 2015)
Nella Jay, Digital Desire set #11270 (20 Jan 2011)
mega.nz \ #!sexg0JwK!QtKUrfFeWSoO2yC1ZR-k-06AhsGfSAGs9XdeTJB2tOs
Shay Laren, Digital Desire set #10230 (28 Dec 2009)
mega.nz \ #!peQXBYqC!C3mZ929ez6ojB3b5Ekd7l7BRu-qHWIsSOU58ntlsGVo
Should I post some more info with each link? Like total number of pictures in the set, resolution and total filesize? Anything else?
Is anyone even really downloading these? :) I wish I could get some statistics from Mega... I haven't used it for sharing my own files before so if there's a way, do tell me.
Shay Laren, Digital Desire set #10225 (23 Sep 2010) [68 pics, 3000x2000, 101.3 MB]
mega.nz \ #!wWxm2aLR!oGlFyiBt82QqELTwP287SwnaAPxOMWKJ6T36Qxb89kU
Gotta say I downloaded all of 'em except that set of Harper. While Ulya is my favourite by far it's still always nice to expand my collection of those. And some of them I hadn't known before so it's even more interesting.
On a different topic. I don't know why but some of these pictures lack some sort of way to incorporate the hair of those girls aesthetically into the whole picture. I guess it's something only I see as I focus on those things but I definitly think it looks a bit strange sometimes.
Oh and by the way thanks for having the thread.
Shay Laren, Digital Desire set #10243 (29 Apr 2010) [43 pics, 3000x2000, 70.1 MB]
mega.nz \ #!IKYWFBbQ!59V586VBOm04YB6n5-B099GQ_BMv04ZOr8yQVdPjF3E
It's "4chan" for all of them.
Shay Laren, Digital Desire set #10226 (18 Jul 2008) [105 pics, 3000x2000, 189.3 MB]
mega.nz \ #!sfwRBJpR!B4hT2dLGhSF3I_SGPTurn7NmsG2tgYSF2lhvDf4huMA
Okay, I need to take a break from posting now but will continue later (tomorrow if not later today). I still have lots more of Shay and of course others.
Can you give some examples of pics that in your opinion work and do not work? (post pics here while I'm away if you want)
Shay Laren, Digital Desire set #10200 (16 Aug 2009) [89 pics, 3000px, 127.2 MB]
mega.nz \ #!AK4QjYCJ!CZuwapI_lIHCXupF1XeJbrwFJJtLD4rugffQuRp_4qQ
I will try to search for pics which are already in this thread first to be sure I'm in no danger of reposting.
>17695093 Just who choose to have hair over the shoulder from that angle? It completly destroys the upper bodyshape, especially since her shoulder is still sticking out.
> 17695110 Maybe it's more the sun here which is the problem but her hair seems kinda raw and not looked after properly
Or take >17695166 and >17695168 as an example. The first one of them is a pose I see way too often. It's distracting to see her hair going between her brests from that angle as it makes her right breast look bigger than the left one (from the viewers perceptive, not her own).The second picture is miles better as there her hair isn't in a way that is distracting but more comforting.
>17695183 Well I know that's just way too much my perspective but I can't stand here that her hair is hiding parts of her left eye while her right temple can still be seen
Well I gotta admit that from seeing >17695986 and >17695987 the biggest problem here just like in the pic of Taylore Vixen at the pool from before. If your hairstyle is straight light from these angles always show some hair which is a bit chaotic and that has negative influence on aesthetics. But it really does well for certain poses in a wilder style as it promotes these (example >17696006)
I'd say I said enough for now, maybe you got the gist, maybe you think I'm a madman both can be utterly possible. And to have a reason to post this text this long on /s/ I'll give you this one. It may be low resolution which is why I hesitate to post it but how can one not love this face.
Shay Laren, Digital Desire set #10204 (31 Mar 2006) [142 pics, 3000px, 187.1 MB]
mega.nz \ #!9OZCTDiD!KH7JeDt-TbiIrtKdUcyhMxIqqOyUEpruXYcQ7sMb4fw
Shay Laren, Digital Desire set #10223 (25 Jan 2013) [88 pix, 3000px, 46.7 MB]
mega.nz \ #!wfoXlLRI!ZO8oa_Oe9Djup46VCFWDM110FXZjZHURn6P6R5qxVL8
The previous one (>>17697741) was the last Shay photoset in full quality I've got already uploaded on Mega. I still have a few more on my hdd, will upload them later.
This one and a couple more I have in 3000px but slightly lesser quality (check the filesizes). Not sure if these were ever available in better quality, this is the best you can get currently from the official site. Would like to get the full quality versions if yes (for example >>17697002 >>17697029 I already found elsewhere in better quality)
Shay Laren, Digital Desire set #10197 (4 Jul 2013) [57 pix, 3000px, 29.3 MB]
mega.nz \ #!gKQRQLKI!-Wy506IwInn12h2wIRbiYqiezynvDumFysUsRfHci70
Also, some sets are only available in 1600px from the official site even though I'm pretty sure they've been released in 3000px previously. I've found links to a 126 MB version of the set this pic is from (DD #10198) for example but they're all dead unfortunately...
but here's the link to the 1600px version anyway (and also thread is now full, will make another one later):
Shay Laren, Digital Desire set #10198 (10 May 2007) [131 pix, 1600px, 56.8 MB]
mega.nz \ #!dfRH3JyS!zn7FadXuNQS6OJc7sO-O1322HHjlJY6sxue6NDly9rU