I decided to find out what "FUCKING NORMIES" could possibly be in Latin.
I broke it into steps, breaking it into "FUCKING NORMAL FAGGOTS"
"Fucking"="Futuens"
"Normal" = "Normalis" or "Normativus"
"Faggots = "Fascis"
Not sure about how this will go down, or how accurate it is, but here's my result:
FUTUENS NORMATIVUS FASCIS!!!
Have I accomplished anything at all, whatsoever?
>latin for faggots is fascis
checks out
>>39654055
Fuck off normie
Why the fuck would you want to say that in latin? It sounds retarded and it's 100% recognizable since its the fucking parent language of most western european languages.
>>39654154
I don't have one for "Fags" so I went with faggots. Reasonable?
>>39654184
Just in case you time travel by accident, I would presume, or if some asshole calls you uncultured.
I only went to the trouble of finding it out of curiosity, and the fact that I was bored.
I do have Aspergers, so I am actually autistic, so there's that.
>>39654234
Hey man sorry i went off on you
Was just angery at myself. Also autism. Kill me.
There are a few problems I see. First off I believe the adjective traditionally comes after the noun itself. Second, I don't believe that "normativus" is a real Latin word, it was probably invented by some dumb monk. Thirdly what you've written is singular (i.e. a single fucking normalfag). Finally I'm not sure what the structure of noun+adjective+participle is so I'd stick futuens at the end too.
My revised translation:
FASCES COMMUNES FUTUENS
... if we want to be literal. "Fucking" has a different meaning then literally wanting to have intercourse with; it's more of an incredible annoyance. I think "detestable" is better for getting the actual meaning across. So...
FASCES COMMUNES EXSECRABILES
>>39654394
Hm. Impressive. I was going more "literal" with mine, but okay.