>Walk into chad's room >See this girl Wat do?

>reverse image search
>no results

dump more

Berate his sloppy knot work.

>>39513044
load her up in the trunk while chad's busy being distracted then take her home and fuck her

File: 1503779442552.jpg (80KB, 826x958px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 826x958px

>>39513044
I take a full-round to finish the job with a cu de gras.

How do i just walk into chads room?

she seems tall
like too tall for me

umm hey miss, sorry i didn't mean to embarrass you, i'm looking for chad, do you know where he is?

Make her listen to a 3 hour lecture on why bdsm relationships are psychologically damaging to the sub. Then tickle her feet.

>>39513234
BDSM relationships are on average healthier and better adjusted than vanilla people.

>>39513044
Roll her over to make sure she's OK.
Ask her if she wants to be untied, and untie her if she does.

File: 1503811905951.jpg (241KB, 706x1000px) Image search: [Google]

241KB, 706x1000px

>>39513256
>this is what the psychologically traumatized actually believe

>>39513044
>Grab her
>Put her in my car
>untie her
>Tell her that I just saved her from Chad
>She suddenly wants to have babies with me
>fugg
>Live happily ever after.

>>39513044
>Wat do?
Get fucked by Chad for entering his room.

>>39513044
i would make her eggs

>>39513256
You can't willingly let yourself be restrained and forced upon and be health. Being tied up is cruel, and if you want that to yourself, you are not right in the head.

>>39513311
>no bowl of eggs
You didn't do it right

Prolonged, merciless tickle torture is the only answer, every time.

>>39513333
>>39513328
anytime i'm available, they will all have eggs made. so many eggs.

>You roll her over
>Suddenly penis
What do you do now?

>>39513301
>>39513331
Maybe if you had sources instead of ad hom, I'd listen to you.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-wide-wide-world-psychology/201502/the-surprising-psychology-bdsm

>>39513439
>psychologytoday
>a reliable, scientific source
Nice denial, bud

>>39513434
go to town on it

>>39513452
>the article is quoting multiple actual studies I refuse to acknowledge or read, and neither will I post studies supporting my argument because I enjoy the taste of cock too much
Alright, fun "discussion" anon. You have a good day.

File: 1496018681631.jpg (262KB, 567x700px) Image search: [Google]

262KB, 567x700px

>>39513439
>posting a link to a blog as evidence
Are you a masochist?
Surely no sane person would lay themselves as bare as you just did towards our judging eyes.

>>39513439
It is wrong to tie up women

>>39513439
> psychology today
im legit feeling pity for u anon
call suicide hotline if someone bondaged and raped u, ok?

>>39513471
Link the studies, then, Dr. Sexfreak.

>>39513044
Flip him over and suck his femmenine benis of course! c:

>>39513504
>>39513528
It's good to see more anons cannot read. You make this board great.

>>39513533
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1300/J056v18n01_05
Connolly (2006) - Psychological Functioning of Bondage/Domination/Sado-Masochism (BDSM) Practitioners

http://www.andreaswismeijer.nl/
Wismeijer, A. A. J., & van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2013). Psychological Characteristics of BDSM practitioners.Journal of Sexual Medicine

File: 1504002511356.jpg (105KB, 1063x1038px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 1063x1038px

>>39513601
Skimmed through them.
They don't support your wild claims at all.

Are you okay?

>>39513044
> Start fucking her
> "7 inches balls deep ? YOU'RE NOT CHAD !"

>>39513645
>Skimmed through them.
You tried.

>>39513645
>The results mostly suggest favorable psychological characteristics of BDSM practitioners compared with the control group; BDSM practitioners were less neurotic, more extraverted, more open to new experiences, more conscientious, less rejection sensitive, had higher subjective well-being, yet were less agreeable.
Literally the results of the Wismeijer study. But nice try.

File: 1503244520639.jpg (11KB, 238x212px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 238x212px

>>39513682
You can't even state how those documents support your idea.
You're the illiterate one.

>>39513706
i'm not anon that posted the links. Slow down on your skimming.

>>39513699
>control group isn't even vanilla, just non-bdsm
You're not even trying

>>39513838
>non-BDSM isn't vanilla
Nice grasping at straws. Still haven't seen a study refuting anything I've posted.

File: 1501749101633.jpg (73KB, 601x625px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 601x625px

>>39513855
>having a failure of a "study" is evidence
Let me guess, you're an American?

>>39513871
>me not posting anything remotely scientific and continuing to attack your person is better than you posting two sourced psychological studies
And I'm the American?

"what the fuck how did this get in my room"

File: aALpITm.png (146KB, 558x361px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 558x361px

>>39513044
isn't this the start of killing stalking?

File: 1500692116119.jpg (33KB, 401x485px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 401x485px

>>39513891
You still haven't reasonably backed your assertion. What's there to destroy but hollow arguments?

>>39513912
Alright, I'll bite. How more reasonably than citing studies done by experts supporting my argument would you like me to argue?
Or rather, what do you have against posting studies supporting your argument? Seems like that'd be a really easy way to refute what I've said.

File: 1503329322580.png (384KB, 742x511px) Image search: [Google]

384KB, 742x511px

>>39513939
How about citing a study that DIRECTLY backs your claims instead of some study that shows that sex-freaks are more open-minded? No shit, they're deviants. That doesn't make them better adjusted than vanilla sexers.

>"uh hey it's me chad"
>get to work

>>39513964
>less neurotic, higher well-being
How is that not better adjusted?

>>39513964
Different anon, onus of proof is still on you to show evidence to your claim as you; a) was the one to bring the argument up first and b) still haven't shown any studies backing up your OPINION

also, links to this 3hr lecture of yours

>>39513044
Thats clearly a boy

>>39514027
Even better *licks lips*

>>39513311
are you stupid? she'd just run back to Chad.

>>39513044
Walk back out, or depending on the kind of Chad ask her if she even wants to be there