Thread replies: 6
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
Anonymous
Social """""'"'Sciences""""""" and humanities 2017-08-31 10:47:24 Post No. 39434367
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Social """""'"'Sciences""""""" and humanities 2017-08-31 10:47:24 Post No. 39434367
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: 1478896376703.jpg (47KB, 645x968px) Image search:
[Google]
47KB, 645x968px
Social """""'"'Sciences""""""" and humanities
Anonymous
2017-08-31 10:47:24
Post No. 39434367
[Report]
Why are they called sciences if they don't use empiricism or the scientific method? You can't run experiments with measurable results over societies to confirm or disprove autistic theories thought up by jews in the 19th and 20th centuries.
Is it just so brainlets who couldn't get into a STEM degree get to feel smart?
>>
>t. Anon the NEETcuck
>>
>>39434417
t. just came back from a lecture about something inconsequential and easily digestible
>>
>>39434367
many experiments done by STEM grads have little or no value. social studies provides plenty of value.
if you talk about being smart or not then you're at the bottom of society senpai. everybody has their own thing they are good at.
>>
The study fields only exist for dumb gays/women/wannabe psychologists(le mind trick types) to feel accomplished in studying a science.
>>
>>39434367
Humanities in US seems to be very trash, but in general I don't think everything is to be thrown away.
And Science isn't defined by empiricism at all, unless you consider that Mathematics aren't science.
Thread posts: 6
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1