I think that most of the rape laws are unfairly rigged and just ruin lives. I'm not saying "legalize all rape" but I think a lot can be done to fix it. In particular, three.
> If you are drunk and "raped", it does not count as sexual assault unless you did not put yourself under the influence
Courts have ruled that you are responsible for drunk driving even if friends convinced you because you willingly chose to get drunk. The same should be applied to sexual assault, if you said "yes" when you were drunk, that's not rape, that's a regrettable choice
> A minor (15-18) will be tried as an adult and sentenced similarly if she willingly lies about her age to an adult
Obviously this doesn't apply to pedos, who will go after teenage ass no matter what, but a teenager who willingly catfishes someone will walk while the adult takes the fall. Statutory laws still apply if she tells the truth.
>A false rape accusation carries a hefty fine and jail time and is a criminal, not a civil case.
'nuff said
Those are mine, how would you fix the laws in place?
revoke Title IX so college campus witch hunts aren't encouraged.
that's all I got, don't know much about rape laws
>>39414389
> you shouldn't be charged unless she reports the rape within 3 weeks
Seriously though even if it was forced 3 weeks without talking, might as well wanted that cock inside you.
>>39414389
>> If you are drunk and "raped", it does not count as sexual assault unless you did not put yourself under the influence
How are you qualified to judge the difference between regretting consent and someone literally raping a drunk girl?
>>39414491
More like
>If she was drunk the rape was legal because the slut asked for it
>>39414491
cant tell if roastie or actually autistic
>>39414389
eliminate the age of consent completely
>>39414527
Probably a roastie who is all like
>durr girls night, oh no chad wants my tight puss puss
It literally doesn't matter because feminists don't care about doing you justice, they do everything they can to make it easy to throw you in prison.
That case last week is a good example. Roastie made multiple false allegations, one guy got sentenced to 7 years and served at least 2 years before it became way too obvious she was a serial faker. Ask yourself - if it takes being caught making multiple false rape allegations to free an innocent man, what the hell type of evidence was he found guilty on? The reality is, most people are ignorant of the reality that it really is mostly just the word of a female that can convict you. Oh, and she liked to brag on Facebook about the fact that she'd lied to get her 11,000 pound 'victim of crime' compensation.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/08/24/woman-falsely-accused-15-men-rape-sexual-assault-jailed-ten/
Where I live in Australia, rape is literally defined as penile penetration. So a woman can't legally rape a man.
>>39414653
what if they fuck you with a dildo?
>>39414491
If it was reported immediately and rape kit tests show that it was aggravated, then yes I suppose that would be different.
However, I have a feeling that wasn't the question you were posing.
>>39414796
It literally has to be with a penis to be classified as "rape", the dildo would be "sexual assault" or something. The point is, historically (this is the case in most of the world), a male cannot be legally raped, because males haven't been recognised as potential victims of rape.
In much of the world males are subject to significantly worse treatment by the law too. Not only is there a huge sentencing disparity - but feminists lobbied to gender segregate prisons which makes things infinitely worse for males, because society then doesn't offer males protection. If prisons were gender integrated, there'd be significantly less violence tolerated in prisons because nobody would allow precious roasties to get beaten or raped the way they allow males to.
In many countries males are also subject to different forms of punishment, like in Malaysia males are actually literally caned. Even young boys can be judicially caned on the ass in public in something that resembles a kink dot com video, while women of all ages are exempted (feminists in the country maintain that this is a good thing!)
>>39414891
>>39414653
Is this real? Law student from Sweden asking, that sounds fucked up.
>>39414979
Yeah its real anon, laws not really in our favor
>>39414389
>if a woman is sober and she doesn't say no, she consented
>>39414491
If she isn't passed out drunk it wasn't rape.
>>39415083
I'm not talking about battle of the sexes here, I'm talking basic fucking human rights?
That's just straight up discrimination.
>>39415507
If a women claims rape on me their is enough plausible deniability to get me retained in a jail and sent to court
>its not a battle anon
>>39415507
Sad but true. People no longer appear to care about equal rights or equal treatment under the law, they simply want equality, which often means passing unfair laws that benefit one group because "the other one has too much power".
>>39415269
I can't believe that isn't the law today. The only way I would change it is if she can actually say "no" or have some other safeword in place (just to prevent aggravated assault cases where the victim is actually prevented from speaking)
>>39414389
Here's the difference between driving and getting raped anon
>active choice to get into a car and start it
>pass out and get penetrated by some asshole unknowingly
>>39414389
You need 4 reliable male witnesses to be convicted of rape.
If you have had sex outside of marriage, it is not a crime to rape you, since you already are fucking freely, and only declined consent because you desire to discriminate
-remove the age of consent
-rape is only vaginal, oral, or anal penetration that is not consented to by the penetrated or penetrator
-rape is 1 year in prison and a $1500 fine
That's about it
>>39416390
>pass out and get penetrated by some asshole unknowingly
And?
You are already fucking tons of assholes willingly. How is this any different. Because we wasnt hot enough for you?
>>39416478
>-rape is 1 year in prison and a $1500 fine
This so much
I mean we are handing out 20 year sentences as if they committed manslaughter or some shit.
>>39414389
> If you are drunk and "raped", it does not count as sexual assault unless you did not put yourself under the influence
God, I despise the idiot who thought this law was a good idea.
>drunk chick coming onto a guy all night
>guy has consensual intercourse with her
>they both enjoy it at that moment, regardless of if she regrets it later
>guy has still legally raped her and, if she presses charges, is now a sex offender
>>39416483
Let's see how you feel when Tyrone fucks you in the ass while you're drunk. After all, all you wanna do is lose your virginity right?
>>39416508
I know right? Physically most rape cause less damage than a rough spanking, it's retarded to say sex is such a heavy subject when it's merely a biological function. The only reason people treat as more serious than giving someone laxatives and causing them to shit themselves is because muh feefees.
>touch someones face with my hand without asking them first
>get an overnight jail stay for disorderly conduct
>touch the inside of someones butthole with my penis without asking them
>get put in prison for life
>>39416390
So you're agreeing with me that if you're drunk but conscious it should not be charged, or are you creating a strawman because I triggered you?
>>39416522
Yeah, that's what I was thinking. Let me add one more while it's on my mind.
>You will not be considered a sex offender (and this will apply retroactively unless a judge overrules it) for sexual assault unless it is aggravated or involved a child
Sex offender laws need to be significantly overhauled but this would be a good first step.
>>39416654
should be put to death imo
for both.
>>39414389
Abolish all rape laws. The only reason they exist is the antiquated notion that having sex reduces a woman's value. We already have laws against assault, that's good enough.
>>39416654
>Baby sucks mom's nipple
>Perfectly fine
>Baby sucks dad's penis
>Decades in prison