A few days ago, a roastie came up to me in class
> Hey Anon, I'm going to work with you. All the other guys are so retarded.
> Sex for some people is intimate and meaningful. For some its just meaningless fun. They act like they are better than me because they don't mess around with different people.
What does /r9k/ think about this? is she right?
if you just hand over your intimacy to everyone who comes knocking
then your intimacy isn't very special or valuable is it?
>>39299702
Sure, it's relative. However, if they have any forethought and care about the future at all, they should be able to rationalise why they hold a position. If she cared about the future, having a family or functioning society, she shouldn't have meaningless sex
>>39299702
That's not the proper flow of a conversation
>>39299779
Yeah it was confusing to read not sure what OP really mean
>>39299779
sorry i had to translate this into english and my english not good. what i meant is she was trying to say was their idea of sex (intimate+meaningful) doesnt make them more superior to her because her values = meaningless fun.
yeah that roastie is gonna have her "meaningless fun" with 60 different dicks and become numb whore who can't bond with anyone. single mother at best.
>>39300270
is pair bonding just a meme? i havent been around anyone and im numb.