Sugardaddies/mommies

File: 1467344178621.jpg (78KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 600x450px

I despise the thought of these types of relationships. Both sides of the relationship disgust me. The fact that someone is so miserable/lonely that they would stoop to the level of paying for affection and the fact that there are parasites who enable and profit off of this sort of behavior. Just thinking about it puts me in such a bad mood.

It does also inspire me to better myself and motivates me to make sure that I am financially successful just to lure out the little parasites who would want to be sugar babies and just fuck with them in various ways.

File: 1502856443183.jpg (95KB, 724x720px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 724x720px

>>39124406
get rich then.
spend your money on me anon :)))

>>39124483
All the pictures of attractive women and cartoon girls will never be able to hide the fact that you are most likely a mentally ill man or an unattractive woman.

Actual sugar daddy here. Feel free to ask me something if you're curious.

>>39124547
How much do you spend on your sb weekly?

>>39124547
What events in your life caused you to become such a pathetic enabler?

>>39124547
How'd you get into becoming an SD? How much money do spend/earn. any IRL dates or is it all online?

>>39124587
Not weekly, I give them an allowance on a per meet basis. One I give 1k per meet, another 500, and the third no cash at all, but around 1k in shopping instead.
>>39124599
You sound envious and bitter. How is it pathetic to have NSA girls available for a booty call whenever I feel like it and give them small gifts?

>>39124611
I created an account on SeekingArrangement. That's the default go-to site for these things. I make something like 150k a year. Usually a sugar date (like an overnight somewhere) sets me back maybe 2k total. Hotels dinners gifts etc.

>>39124621
Why not just get prostitutes? They're cheaper.

>>39124653
Who says I'm not? Besides, sugar babies are a kind of prostitutes anyway.

File: 4534324.png (129KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 300x300px

>>39124621
>small gifts
You pay one 1k to endure your company for a single meeting. That sounds pretty pathetic, but you are more than welcome to play the mental gymnastics required to rationalize the fact that you are paying for something that most people get for free.

>inb4 I make x amount so 1k is chump change

Paying someone $1k to endure your presence is hilarious and pathetic regardless of your tax bracket.

>>39124641
Heard they don't let many guys on there, is it really that simple to make an account?

Sounds kinda gay, but is it necessary to sleep with them or just fun dates would do? Depends from person to person, or is it just expected?

I'm a sugar daddy also most I've ever gifted was 800$ but usually 500. Lol my sb is pissed right now because I haven't gAve her her weekly gift because she pissed me off last week

>>39124688
Yes, they are prostitutes. Except much more expensive, and you have to take them on dates. How boring must it be to spend time with and buy gifts for someone who doesn't even care about you? If you ask me, it is pretty pathetic that you have to pay so much for that when most people get it for free.

>>39124693
Not everyone is a fat smelly penniless neckbeard like you.

>>39124693
>be poor
>have no gf
>throw an autistic fit over someone on the internet being a sugardaddy

come on anon...

>>39124695
Where did you hear that from? Anyone can create an account. What you end up doing with someone from there is up to you, but sex is pretty much expected if you end up having an arrangement. After all, what would be the point of taking a young qt on an expensive date if you don't get to fuck her?

>>39124641
Is that about what's expected?I love the idea of this but it seems kind of pricy since ideally I'd want her to roleplay being my wife by spending 2 or 3 days a week with me and going to the occasional event. Once I get settled into my career I should make around 150k. I can handle 1 or 2k/mo but a miser little fuck. I have nice things but I buy them once and they last until worn out. Aside from alcohol and food I really don't spend.

>>39124711
I pay them because I am a bit rougher then just normal sex

>>39124711
You know what is pathetic? Throwing an autistic tantrum over someone on the internet who had money and is getting sex.

>>39124709
is it similar to a relationship?

what truly differentiates them from prostitutes?

also, are the SD's commonly like 100k+/annually do you get more upper class men?

>>39124760
It really is up to what you and her agree on. I just gave my own spending as an example. I'm sure some SDs spend less, some more. Your plan sounds good, so I wish you good luck in your search once you begin.

>>39124733
Not any of those things, but like I said, you can keep being delusional about your life and actions. Keep letting the parasites profit off of your desperation.

>>39124748
I guess our definitions of an "autistic fit" vary slightly. Like I told your best friend, you can be as delusional as you'd like. Moral of the story is that paying for someone to endure your company and show you affection is pathetic. I don't need your opinion on the matter.

>>39124351

Why are her hands so big

Oh

File: 1499892576704.jpg (72KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 640x640px

>>39124538
>cartoon girls
>CARTOON GIRLS
>C A R T O O N G I R L S

>>39124783 it's kinda like a relationship we go out to eat duck cuddle text daily. And I'm the daddy not the baby lol. And I've made 4 million usd so far this year Idk about the average

>>39124783
It is a relationship. Just different. It's not called "arrangement" for nothing. For me, I see my SBs as part-time gfs. We're like bf/gf when we're out on a date. Outside of that, nothing. The big advantage over a conventional gf is that you get to skip all the lies and drama and relationshit hassles.

>>39124758
The site boasts about how they 'verify' it's users, with only the most 'qualified' and 'upper-class' members. I just assumed.

The sex part makes sense. Just heard some sb's don't sleep with them right away, but it's quite uncommon.

>>39124773
I know fat, ugly, poor guys who get pussy. How bad must you be that you have to pay 1k for a girl to pretend to be your gf for one night?

>>39124798
You're projecting your own desperation and anger on others. Sugar daddies are the opposite of desperate. They do it because they can.

>>39124833
You fail to understand that just because the only way you could get laid is to pay for it, that everyone else is also as repulsive and desperate as you.

>>39124819
I'm a little different with my sb's it's more full time then part time relationship with me

>>39124819
>>39124818
>>39124760
if you guys have part-time gfs/make a lot of money, why do you still go on here?

>>39124823
There are different kinds of account levels. The "verified" is an extra status but it's pretty useless. Means you let them do a background check on you to show you're not a rapist or whatever. I have found girls on there just fine with an ordinary account.

>>39124855
Because I can't sleep right now

>>39124855
Because I'm bored at work.

>>39124885
Damn tht sucks you gotta work man fuck it's 4 am here

>>39124839
If I was desperate, I would be doing the same thing they are. Sugar daddies do not do it because they can, they do it because they have to. Where they lack in every other facet, they are lucky enough to possess some money in the face of the fact that women are money hungry parasites who will ignore all other shortcomings if it means financial gains. The only thing separating them from other pathetic social outcasts is that they have money and not enough willpower to not spend it on something they ought to be getting for free.

>>39124908
Everything you said is wrong. It's sad that you are so desperate you have this need to project your own miserable failure of a life on strangers on the internet.

>>39124908
I give them money bease I care enough to take care of them I don't have to trust me with all the drugs I have I can get laid just by getting bitches high of I wanted to

>>39124908
Who hurt you to think this way?
why? just why?

File: 1_007_001.png (427KB, 557x605px) Image search: [Google]

427KB, 557x605px

>>39124923
>>39124955
Again, you can play all the mental gymnastics you want. You can play psychologist and try to break down my thought process. You can do whatever else you want. The point is, I don't need your opinion on the matter.

I'll say it to you one more time: you are paying someone to spend time with you. You are paying for something that people get for free. You are being duped, deceived, and tricked; and even in the face of it all, you still try to rationalize it, and that is the funniest part of it all.

>>39124944
So is there a way you can get a woman to tolerate your company besides waiving things in front of them so they can forget how repulsive you are?

Keep those (You)'s coming. This is gold.

>>39124351
Had one to help pay for college since my job and scholarship weren't quite enough. It's not all glitz and glamour, getting dolled up to be with someone you may not necessarily feel comfortable with. (However many of these men are looking for companionship, and it's completely possible to find a platonic SD if you dedicate yourself) I will say a lot of these men were bright and great mentors, and as time goes by, one builds up a genuine connection and care for another person and that makes it easier. It's also very difficult to find the *right* SD/SM for you, someone whose expectations align with yours, are attracted to you and are willing to pay for your time.
Sites I've heard are great are SA, SD4ME, Established Men though as SA has become saturated it has been filled with more salts.

>>39124855
It's not like money cures autism or makes you prefer facebook and reddit. I was smart but lazy so it's just inevitable that things turned out this way. All I do is work and shitpost. It's actually kind of shitty. I like the money but feel bad if spending it or not making more. Only in the last couple years did I grow enough nut hairs to say no to the managers/directors but I still feel bad for doing it. People are born robots, it's not something you just become or ever stop being.

File: 1487544083817.jpg (30KB, 456x402px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 456x402px

>>39124641
>Usually a sugar date (like an overnight somewhere) sets me back maybe 2k total. Hotels dinners gifts etc.
That's a lot of money anon. Why don't you hire an escort instead?

>>39125050
A sugar baby is more personal than a plain escort. You get to know each other over time and enjoy each other's company. It's more than just sex.

File: 1499421150455.jpg (79KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 1000x1000px

>>39124406
You're a spiteful little brat aren't you, maybe you should consider the live and let live method?
If you're planning on doing that pick a masochist that will get off on your abuse and you will both be happy, sounds to me that you're just mad that you don't have the bank to be SD/SM

>>39124908
Am I desperate to get drunk if I'm buying fancy beer/wine/spirits? I could just steal some sugar and bread yeast from the piggly wiggly and make kilju if I were desperate. Hell, pick some fruit and let it ferment from the yeast already on the fruit if we're sticking to the >4free analogy. I don't feel like buying some vineyard with perfect soil and climate, tending vines, measuring out chemicals, controlling every little process, then waiting for it to age. I just buy a couple cases and enjoy it when I'm in the mood. Some guys do like the toilet wine, others enjoy making fancy beer/wine. It's all the same shit really. Some people are so desperate they get it for free from gf, others so desperate they get it form prostitutes, and others so desperate they get it from sugar babies.

>>39124711
>someone who doesn't even care about you?
What do you mean by that? Love is just an abstract concept it's not something everybody feels, or feels it the same way. I care quite a alot for all the girls that give me money to do stuff.

>>39124819
>The big advantage over a conventional gf is that you get to skip all the lies and drama and relationshit hassles.
There is no way that's true. You're paying them for less drama. Probably getting a few more lies but I suppose they call those "white lies"

>>39125007
A lot of the sb's get into it for rent/college/uni, seems pretty smart to me.

Have you ever met with other SB's? Even after you stopped being an SB, do you bring this sort of shit up with your new significant other? Or are there any regrets/fears/etc you're afraid of.

>>39124833
>I know fat, ugly, poor guys who get pussy.
No you don't. You're just butt hurt.

>>39124711
But it's mutual feelings. They both care about each other, it's more like a FWB/no strings attached sort of relationship. A little more professional

>>39125171
>I know nothing about sugar relationships or even girls, but let me tell you about your sugar relationships

>>39125190
He's fat, ugly, poor, and doesn't get pussy. That's why he's so butthurt.

>>39125235
lol omg this is now super sad
i bet you think strippers like you if you pay them enough too huh?

>>39125090
And it sounds to me that you are delusional and become threatened when someone comes along and threatens to topple this fragile house of cards that is your psyche.

You might also want to consider the live and let live method. My opinion on the matter doesn't affect you at all, so why bother getting all fussy about it?

If I ever do plan on doing what I said, I'll make sure it's someone fragile, naive, and weak. They'll learn or they'll get a little scare. Either way, I'll be laughing.

>>39125116
Holy shit, this made my night. Your analogy is fucking absurd and I hope you really do know that deep down. Are you really saying that the same amount of effort is required to get someone to enjoy your company for free as it is to run a full-blown vineyard. If that's the case, keep spending my man. The outlook's not too good for you.

>>39125259
I think you missed the point. Why do you, who obviously has zero experience with girls or relationships, think you can tell others what their relationships are like?

>>39125261
What are you so pissed about?

I don't do any of this stuff but there are a few girls I wouldn't mess around with even though there's not much reason for it, but I'd be more than fine with them helping me out with some of my bills so I'm not stressed out and give them a "good time" i.e. hide my autism and be a little more polite/flirty than normal.
>>39125308
lol why does everyone assume I have no experience on here?

>>39125261
>goes on thread about SD/SBs
>Zero knowledge/experience about this
>Shits on people for being SD/SBs
>People call him out
>"WHY IS EVERYONE MAD LULZ ITS MUH OPINIONS UR ALL WRONG!!!!"

Remember robots
Tiers of being pathetic

Robot tier: crying on r9k

Delusion disgusting normie: thinking your glorified prostitute is anything beyond that, and thinking there aren't ways to get convenient sex without paying especially if you're wealthy

>>39125330
>Implying you need experience to call someone out
Why can't you fags just accept you're even more pathetic then people who fuck prostitutes

>>39125330
Welcome to /r9k/. This is just a variant of the usual, where basement-dwelling kissless virgins believe they are experts on girls and relationships.

>>39125007
Did you end up satisfying some of your SDs fucked up fetishes?

>>39125329
>but there are a few girls I wouldn't mess around with even though there's not much reason for it, but I'd be more than fine with them helping me out with some of my bills so I'm not stressed out and give them a "good time" i.e. hide my autism and be a little more polite/flirty than normal.

I'll attempt to give you an actual reply when you can straighten out this wreak of a statement. One of us is having a stroke because that entire blurb made no sense whatsoever or it might be your aforementioned autism.

>>39125330
What experience do I need? It's a guy paying another person for sex, affection, and company. What am I confusing or not seeing here? All I am seeing is a group of people who are delusional and trying, but failing, to assert that this is not a depressing way to live.

Keep the (You)'s coming. That's the whole reason I'm here; to have a discussion with other people. This is extremely entertaining.

>>39125261
In all three scenarios they enjoy each others company as much. I don't quite get what you are trying to say. Maybe you are just bad at explaining. Let's say there is a girl who is happy to do whatever I want but leave me alone the rest of the time. Wouldn't she be snatched up by another guy already? From my understanding most girls just pretend to be like that for a couple months then slowly start acting shittier so the guy doesn't notice. A sexless marriage where she spends all my money doesn't sound that fun tbdesu. I'd rather just spend a small amount of money and genuinely enjoy my time with someone who is genuinely enjoying their time with me. Besides, if I really cared about her of course I'm going to want to give her nice things and take care of her. It's the same result even if she would do it for free. At least with an arrangement there is no guess work.

>>39125362
SD/SB is more than sex though. If that's all we wanted we'd just go down to the bar and pick up some strange for a ONS. It's obvious you don't know anything about the topic at hand. Do you also break into people's planes who are skydiving and tell them that if they wanted to be scuba diving there are better ways of doing it than by jumping out of a plane with a parachute on their back?

>>39125474
I know that all my SBs very much enjoy being in my company. Obviously, since otherwise they wouldn't be with me in the first place. With one of my SBs we even watch animu and play vidya occasionally. Another great thing about SBs is that they're all dtf whenever I want. Try that with a regular gf, she'll come up with excuses.

>>39125474
You can take out the guess work by not being a beta cuck who let's himself get taken advantage of. But I'm sure that's pretty hard for someone disillusioned into thinking someone being paid is genuinely enjoying then time with you. Let me elaborate once again. If someone is "genuinely" enjoying the time they don't have to get paid. You're a means to an end and you've both conditioned yourselves to not feel the shame you should

>>39125474
I have no idea what you are referring to when you say "all three scenarios". It's kind of funny that you have the audacity to tell me that I am bad at explaining when it seems like English is definitely not your first language (at least I hope not).

>genuinely enjoy my time with someone who is genuinely enjoying their time with me

Yep, you got me on that one. Nothing says 'genuine' like having to pay someone to spend time with you. And what is a 'small amount of money' exactly? Because if you are like the other guy, paying someone $1k to spend time with you isn't a small amount regardless of your income.

>>39125514
>I know that all my SBs very much enjoy being in my company.
Kek
>Obviously, since otherwise they wouldn't be with me in the first place
Boy the cognitive dissonance is hard. Do you remember the fact that you're paying them?

It's alot easier to pretend you're having a good time and endure the company of an autist when you're getting paid

>>39125474
You're wasting your time trying to explain relationships to that autistic kissless virgin.

>>39125567
$1k is actually chump change to anyone with a decent job. Only NEETs would think it's a lot.

>>39125620
Obviously but do you earn 1k from spending an afternoon with an autistic gentleman?

No, you're lucky to get that from a full day of real work. You fags can't wrap your head around it because you're so disillusioned

>>39125620
But that's not what we're talking about and I think you know that. We are talking about spending $1k for someone to endure your company for a limited time. You can tell me that $1k is nothing, proportional to your income, but the amount of money you should be spending on affection from other people is $0. Whether you make $10k a year or $100k a year, $0 is still the amount you should be spending on this type of pathetic degeneracy.

>>39125669
If you would ever have had a gf, you'd know it's not possible to spend $0 on a girl in any kind of relationship.

>>39125720
Again, you are straying away from the main idea in a feeble attempt to rationalize what you are doing.

An actual relationship is built on a love for each other. Of course you will spend money. People will spend money on those they love and guess what? Those exchanges are reciprocated. That's one of the differences between the degeneracy you try to promote and an actual relationship. The transfer of money is two-sided, not one sided. Besides, the most glaring difference is that your relationship is purely based on money, and that's it, nothing else. Your idea that your parasite enjoys spending time with you is a result of built up disillusionment. An actual romantic relationship is not centered on money. I think you know this, but again, your cognitive dissonance prevents you from admitting it.

Also, because I'm sure you'll try to point this out: I do not consider relationships that are not strictly outlined as SD/SB but have a heavy money influence to be the relationships I accept as romantic. I'd group those alongside the degeneracy that you preach.

>>39125720
Spending money on girl =/= paying prostitute

Also explain niggers leeching off white women

>>39125790
You're confusing your 2d waifu here with actual girls.

>>39125864
There's a two-sided transfer of money between myself and a cartoon?

>>39124351
i just got out of a relationship like this with me being the sugar daddy i suppose

it was pretty fun, the sex was great and i was able to convince myself that she was at least a little in love with me at times

i regret it a bit because it seems like a waste of money at this point now that we ended things

if i can find another 18-22 beautiful westernized asian girl to do it with again i might though

>>39125669
Let me explain to you something about money and girls, since you clearly have no experience with either. $1k is nowhere near enough for a girl to go on an overnight date with lots of sex if she finds the guy repulsive. If she is ok with 1k, then she clearly must find the guy enjoyable enough.

>>39125939
Why/how did it end?

>>39125939
What area are you in?

Glad I live in Europe. I just go to a brothel and fuck a 9/10 hooker a couple of times a month. I need variety and would never want to keep fucking the same girl week after week.

>>39125959
Let me explain something to you, my disillusioned friend. Paying someone to go out with you and/or have sex with you for $1k is pathetic. You can get that for free, but you are too socially unequipped to know how, so you throw money at the problem like the beta you are. Literally millions upon millions of men achieve this daily and you are too stupid to do something that comes easily to most so you throw money at the problem like a giant child. Frame it whatever way you would like. The fact that you are even bothering to reply to me tells me that I am getting under your skin and deconstructing your warped mindset.

>>39126086
Why not both. You can fuck hookers and still have SBs to fuck occasionally.

>>39126087
>such projection
You're unable to comprehend that not all men are like you. You are obviously a kissless virgin NEET and automatically assume everyone is like you.

>>39126113
I have no interest in hanging out with some chick that's essentially a prosriture and talking about stupid shit. I just want to fuck.

>>39125436
>I'll attempt to give you an actual reply when you can straighten out this wreak of a statement. One of us is having a stroke because that entire blurb made no sense whatsoever or it might be your aforementioned autism.
learn how to english, you're probably just a run of the mill slut girl and pissed off you can't get chads to pay you for it

>>39125175
Thanks for that, I try to make smart decisions in the sugar bowl and other areas of life. Yes I have but not specifically for SB purposes, I have found out many of my classmates also were involved in sugar after already being their friend. Sometimes you can already suspect lol. I do bring this up with my significant others once I know them long enough. I have no regrets or fears from my choices besides the times I felt felt somewhat jaded about dating or when I have developed unrealistic expectations for a boyfriend my age. If a boy felt insecure about me being a SB I would not have romantic interest in them.
>>39125433
No it never got to that point however I did have some of them confess some of their power complexes and pegging fetishes

>>39125514
That's because SB's are pretending to like you for the money. GF's usually don't like their boyfriends after around the 1st or 2nd week but keep up the act a bit longer. With SB it's all an act.

>>39125959
A regular girl isn't going to fuck anyone for 1k. You're trying to equate paying a prostitute to paying a regular woman.

>>39126191
All women are prostitutes. Only the form of payment differs.

>>39126171
What happened to make you this way? Were you molested as a child?

>>39126170
Do you find it hard to date boys your age after you've got used to SDs pampering you in ways that those of your age can't?

>>39125959
If a guy is enjoyable enough, she'll accept him not fucking 1k

So sad

>>39126196
Yeah, and some of us have to pay exorbitant amounts of money because we're pathetic beta faggots

We're trying to make that distinction

>>39126202
>not delusional
>Were you molested?

Are you so concerned about abuse victims because you know your hookers feel a similar shame?

>>39126202
I assume you're talking to the other anon from the comment chain and not just the one I left there.
Also no but in my experience dating women they might kind of like you at first but they're generally spiteful little shits that hate everyone. You ever sat down and wondered what kind of ego you have to have to think so low of everyone around you that you have to go find a new guy to fuck you constantly?
>Oops this one sucks, it's only been a few weeks. Better get another one!

Don't kid yourself in thinking SB's are any different, they're probably more so but have to pretend a lot harder/longer to make that bread. Some girls are pretty good at concealing their contempt than others- it's a pretty typical trait of successful prostitutes vs normal sluts who fuck just as many if not more guys than prostitutes but don't really get any substantial reward for it.

I doubt sugar mamas exist in any significant amount compared to sugar daddies
I doubt they'd want a autistic twenty something year old neet (like me) when they'd just pay for younger chad
I'm pretty sure they're a unicorn in general

File: 4234342424.jpg (42KB, 400x459px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 400x459px

>>39126127
>You're unable to comprehend that not all men are like you

That's correct, I can't comprehend how someone would be so pathetic as to pay someone else to endure their company. I'd like to assume that everyone has as much self control as I do, but I guess that's not the case and as a result, little parasites profit from it.

>>39126139
Alright, you really do have autism. I'm a guy who is denouncing the fact that other guys are pathetic enough to indulge the sociopathic parasites that profit off this type of relationship. This one might be the reply of the night. Among an endless group of idiots, you reign supreme. (Also, you still didn't fix your sentence so it's intelligible).

>>39126290
They do exist, although fewer in number. If you want to try finding one, why not try setting up an account on SA? Can't hurt to try.

>>39126290
That's weird. I'd pretty much expect a sugar momma to be younger. I'd probably charge an older one extra since they'd have more expectations about going out and how you dress and shit.

>>39126279
One of the nice things about having a SB is that you don't need to concern yourself with worries about whether or not she secretly hates you. Or that one day she'll dump you. You message her when you want to meet and she'll say yes or no.

>>39126300
Maybe I will. Won't expect anything though.
Is the site secure/private? No shady stuff?

>>39126295
>(Also, you still didn't fix your sentence so it's intelligible).
Hey too bad you're not intelligent enough to make sense out of something even if it were perfectly punctuated. I think you're rather small minded and dumb. I think it's morally/ethically wrong to pay sugar babies for this sort of thing. I really have no problem with a sugar momma though because you seem to have a very naive, simplistic, immature out view on the world.

>>39126321
>and she'll say yes or no.
>or no
lol you get turned down by prostitutes
you really think strippers like you when you pay them huh?

This shit is honestly pretty funny if not really damn sad. I'm up way past my bed time too bad this probably will get archived when the other autist you've been arguing with shoves off.

>>39126335
>No problem with sugar mommas because of another r9k poster

>Naive, simplistic, immature
I find your comment stupid, idiotic and dumb

Kek it's an actual fucking retard

>>39126330
Not sure what you mean by secure/private, but it's a legit site used by plenty of SDs and SBs. You don't need to give out your real name or anything. Use a throwaway email account. Have some nice pics and a nice bio writeup.

>>39126321
Yeah, she won't dump you when you run out of money, finds a better john, pays off her student loans or just finally finds her sense of self worth

>>39126359
She might not be available or doesn't feel like it. So what. Then I ring up another SB.

>>39126335
>says it's wrong to pay sugar babies
>is okay with sugar mommas

Pick one.

>is okay with sugar mommas because of my view of the world

What.

>out view

What did he mean by this?

Holy shit, I can't handle this right now. Keep those (You)'s coming my man. Reading your attempts at the English language is almost as good as that Laker Girls Meet and Greet thread from a few days ago. I am genuinely trying to make sense of your thoughts and I just can't. (Also, don't mean to keep bringing this up, but you still didn't change that one sentence).

>>39126406
You fail to understand there is no "dumping" in the sugar bowl. One simply discontinues the arrangement.

>>39126410
>She might not be available or doesn't feel like it.
Or she knows she can avoid more moments of disgust and self-deprecation because you're so goddamn pathetic you'll submit to her even though you paid

>>39126437
So there's dumping, just use better terminology so it sounds less(more) pathetic?

>>39124813
Not anon but stop glorifying anime it's literally cartoons you fucking cunt

>>39126464
Now it's clear why you are so disgusted and negative. You're gay in denial, and desperately want to try to avoid thinking of men in a sexual manner. That's why you project yourself into a girl's body.

>>39125966
i wanted it to get more serious as this was my first time being in this sort of situation

it was more or less an unagreed upon feature of the relationship i went with because i make money and enjoy spending it, i fooled myself into thinking eventually it would become real

its all good now but its a learning experience with future relationships like this

i cant stress how good the sex was so i am not salty about it

>>39126658
I'll take her. Is she still available?

>>39126656
Im gay, at least I don't have to pay a lump sum to get laid

>>39126723
Being gay is basically cheating. You get unlimited free sex anytime you want.

>>39126080
i am in the texas area, last response was deleted

>>39126732
So can straight people, I'll admit it's easier for fags though

>>39126737
Damn. Too far. I could use another SB.

>>39126087
>you are so childish
>you literally act like a 6 year old little boy
>paying thousands of dollars for sex
>only childish little kids would do something so ridiculous