How many pixels until something is considered pornography?

>>38686723
8x8 because you could draw a dick and vagina with that amount.

>>38686775
>8x8
Wrong

File: 220px-S_CustersRevenge_1.png (6KB, 220x144px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 220x144px

You only need a few

File: 1500685768492.gif (2MB, 500x263px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 500x263px

>>38686723
let's find out- so this is clearly pornography.

File: 1500685768492.gif (927KB, 500x263px) Image search: [Google]

927KB, 500x263px

>>38686907
this is still pretty recognizable as pornography as well.

File: 1500685768492.gif (420KB, 500x263px) Image search: [Google]

420KB, 500x263px

>>38686967
This FEELS obscene, but it's pretty hard to place.

File: 1500685768492.gif (259KB, 500x263px) Image search: [Google]

259KB, 500x263px

>>38687028
The majority of people would not recognize this as pornographic.

>>38687130
oh, man
dat pixel though

>>38687130
pretty bad test OP, you should post the pre-pixelized versions along with pixelized versions of not-porn and have us decide.

File: 1500685768492.gif (132KB, 500x263px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 500x263px

>>38687130
This looks like a tasteful color palette.

>>38687028
Don't think you can tell there if you don't know what you're looking at.

>>38687201
read the thread moron, it's the same gif the whole way through

File: 1500685768492.gif (69KB, 500x263px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 500x263px

>>38687207
and now it's shitty art.

>>38687246
no shit? i said the OP should post different porn GIFs that are ALREADY pixelized before showing us the full detail one first. obviously we'll be able to tell if he shows us the high detail one first.

>>38687700
Your original post was incoherent

>>38687130
I dont know man, even then it's all skin tones and reciprocating motion, those factors still make it seem dirty, even though you cant really tell what it is.

>>38687825
Maybe if you have an extra chromosome

>>38688151
T. Idiot who can't properly convey his thoughts

>>38688190
>implying I'm >>38687201