Is it true, robots?
>the earth is 4000 years old!
>high IQ
Go back to /pol/ you larper
anprim is probably bottom left or middle and it's average anprim is 130+ iq so no.
>>38681189
Y-axis=doubt in humanity's ability to act in their own interests
X-axis=faith in humanity to help others
dont liberals on average have a higher iq than conservatives
>>38681418
I know a fuckton of libs who literally only vote based on social issues and don't give a shit about any other domestic issues
>>38681447
yeah but liberals on average have a higher iq than conservatives
>>38681202
The fuck are you going on about? It's a fucking political compass.
>>38681447
i know, but liberals on average have a higher iq than conservatives
>>38681447
I know a fuck ton of conservatives that vote the same way. I think there are idiots and reasonable people on both sides.
>>38681447
and i can say the exact same about conservatives
why do dumb hillbillies always vote republican? it certainly isn't for their economic policies
>>38681189
how does being left wing make someone low IQ exactly? or are we operating on the /pol/ spectrum of politics where leftwing means you're an SJW communist and rightwing means you're an epic alt-right nazi
>>38681189
It's "accurate" but not really. Only if you look at the most most basic descriptions of each political ideology that could be placed on the map. And even then it's still innacurate.
>>38681456
Wrong. They're more likely to have a college degree, but conservatives are more intelligent on average.
>>38681651
>more likely to have a college degree
>more likely to work a higher paying job
>more likely to score higher on a legitimate IQ test
>>38681189
guess I have a big ego and low IQ.
>>38681189
no, get out pol. Nobody believes your retarded shit.
>tfw centrist
>>38681651
Conservatives literally arent, on every metric liberals and lefties are considered smarter.
>>38681202
>>38681623
>>38681698
>hehehe well u must be an evil nazi
>>38681456
>>38681202
>>38681418
Yes, but this is a great example of the Savanna-IQ Interaction Hypothesis.
Liberals tends to deviate from tradition (obviously much more so than most conservatives.) According to the aforementioned hypothesis those with higher IQs have a better ability at grasping ideas which are new in terms of their environment. This ultimately makes them more likely to buy into outgroup ideas or those ideas that are eccentric and new.
Is this a good thing or a bad thing? Both.
It was an advantage to many of our ancestors, however, there's little removing individuals from the genepool when they accept ideas which are a disadvantage to themselves or others.
This is ultimately where the Savanna principle comes into play. The Savanna principle is essentially any evolved advantage which now has negative consequences in the current year (or post-industrial society at large.)
At the end of the day this doesn't mean that left-wingers as a whole are smarter than right-wingers. Libertarians tend to score higher on IQ tests than both conservatives and liberals, seeing as their philosophy is a seemingly eccentric political minority.
Hell, the average IQ of a Nazi official at the Nuremberg trials was 128.
>>38681720
Low IQ = Conservative
Median IQ = Liberal
High IQ = Centrist
>>38681672
See... >>38681732
I should also note there are some tests where Republicans are more /knowledgeable/ than Democrats on the issues.
Don't fellate yourself so much.
>>38681732
>the average IQ of a Nazi official at the Nuremberg trials was 128
I'll be sure to tell anons that when I LARP as a nazi
>>38681202
>race and gender don't exist but white males are bad and privileged
>high IQ
>>38681722
did you miss where I mocked both sides or are you that thin skinned
>>38681189
if you cherry pick your data properly you can definitely skew the iq axis to be like that
ego is probably immeasurable and you probably have equally egotistical people on both ends
Jesus christ this whole thread is nazi this, nazi that. Go back to watching Cenk Uygur if you think every rightwinger is either a drooling redneck or a nazi
Literally as dumb as people who think leftists are all either SJWs or communists
>>38681759
Wow. You really blew my argument out of the water.
That wasn't a defense or validation of Nazis by any means. It was meant to back up my prior argument. The Nazis were a completely organic and eccentric movement. It makes sense that many of their members would be intelligent.
This is how the IQ distribution works
>>38681812
i know this is bait but it's triggering me for no good reason
>>38681811
What the fuck are you talking about I'm unironically saying I'm going to tell this to anons when I'm LARPing as a Nazi because I think it's funny.
>>38681844
Well if that's the case, have fun anon.
Also checkem.
>>38681838
>thinking thats bait
This is what brainlets ACTUALLY, SERIOUSLY, UNIRONICALLY believe
>>38681189
No its actually like this brainlet ancap
>>38681885
tanks fren i will
>>38681904
Extended chart for you brainlets
>>38681732
>>38681753
>Liberals tends to deviate from tradition (obviously much more so than most conservatives.) According to the aforementioned hypothesis those with higher IQs have a better ability at grasping ideas which are new in terms of their environment.
so liberals have higher IQ than conservatives and the image is wrong
>>38681959
What if I grew up with liberal parents in a liberal environment in a very liberal province in a very liberal country and I ended up becoming a conservative? My IQ is 115.
>>38681983
a person with liberal parents in a liberal environment in a very liberal province in a very liberal country who is still a liberal would have an IQ of 120
>>38681418
Yes but they count rednecks towards conserviteves but not inner city blacks towards the left
>>38682039
Do you have a source for this claim?
>>38682039
>count rednecks not inner city blacks
neither would have taken an IQ test
>>38681959
On average, yes.
However, the issue is that there's nothing stopping high-IQ individuals from adopting reckless policy.
Having a high-IQ does not make you right.
Really, you can't label IQ on an axis like that. It depends on the individual movement at large.
Not to mention, having a high IQ won't make you more knowledgeable. It simply allows you to apply that knowledge.
And Pew showed that Republicans are generally more knowledgeable than Democrats.
www.people-press.org/2011/11/07/what-the-public-knows-in-words-and-pictures/
>>38682093
>On average, yes.
I don't care about your discussion on what qualifies as "true" intelligence. OP's image shows that the liberal side of the political spectrum have lower IQ than the conservative side
I stated that was false. You stated that was false. Nothing else matters.
>>38682024
Yeah but liberalism is the norm here. Literally the normiest thing you can do here is be a progressive.
e.g. In highschool we had to take a political compass test and only three students in the class scored conservative on the test. One libertarian jewish girl who had insanely high grades and ended up becoming an accountant, one mixed race nazi guy who had the highest grade in history class and would end up becoming a lawyer, and me, who put zero effort into everything in college and still got straight as.
Average IQ in this country is 98 and everyone else in this class scored liberal, with a class average being a C
but sure, conservatives are dumb
>>38682145
>libertarian jewish girl
Why are Jews either full on lefties or libertarians? Unless you don't mean the Mises type Lib?
>>38682119
>the liberal side
Anon, there isn't a "liberal side." There's left and right wing. One could argue the chart is right because libertarians in the American sense are on the """conservative""" side.
Overall, it is flawed simply because you can't label IQ on a X/Y political axis, NOT because liberals score higher on IQ tests.
>>38682145
It's because you're the eccentric minority, anon.
Hopefully this helps: >>38681732
>>38682158
I've wondered this myself.
I'm thinking it's because libertarianism has a large economic sustainability focus and Jews have high mathematical IQs.
As the the left-winged Jews, check out Kevin MacDonalds "The Culture of Critique."
>>38681395
I'm pretty far from a free market capitalist, but it doesn't come from a lack of faith in humanity to help others
I think that more often than not humans do want to do right by each other and elevate their community
but I think that it's observable fact that creating non-human profit-driven entities with collective decision-making power, which is what large companies and corporations are, inevitably produces a system where over the course of generations decisions slowly but continuously accrue that erode any humanities in favour of profitability
individually the people who hold the position of decision makers in these organisations all likely want to help out their fellow man but by virtue of the fact that each of them are willing to compromise in different areas in the name of profitability, bit by bit all of the humanity is washed away with the only constant being the pursuit of profitability.
I don't think these institutions are inherently evil but I believe they need unilateral oversight by a regulatory body that does not have profit as its goal, and that concerns itself almost exclusively with public welfare. I think that ideally, the government should be shaped to be that institution.
>>38681189
I think the fact that according to this image IQ and dedication to right-wing theory suppose to be correlated really proves that the "Ego" is headed to the wrong direction.
>>38681189
Anyone whos not a centrist in 2017 is a retard anyway.
>>38682330
Authoritarianism = high IQ
I'm okay with this.
>>38681940
this is 100% correct. I haven't a single quarrel.
>>38681189
It's actually the opposite of truth.
>>38682158
>>38682260
Most jews are actually quite conservative leaning largely because conservatives are generally much more pro Israel. Another big factor is most jews are educated in either medicine, law, and finance. 2 of which usually require you to have an understanding of economics to some degree. Only a retard who understands economics would actually advocate for government overregulation aka liberalism. I personally think the libertarianism thing has a lot to do with the whole Nazi authoritarian thing but quite honestly I know a lot of non libertarian jews but they're mostly older.
>>38682469
really, it's funny that the way conservatives treat jews and the way the alt-right treat jews are pretty much the only thing that makes the alt... alt.
>>38682039
Because even the rednecks are smart enough to vote. The inner city blacks aren't.
>>38682469
Jews are statistically more liberal. They actually voted for Clinton at a higher percent than Catholic hispanics this last election.
You do get the Alan Dershowitz Jews who are conservative due to their pro-Israel leaning, but they still support their leftist brothers in media and shit. It's freaky.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rH1vaZXgbd0
>>38681189
ego = low iq
>>38682592
Jews are neoliberals and not retard populists which is why they didn't vote Trump
>>38682529
Alt right are just the radical feminists of the conservative world. I don't think either is really taken all to seriously. The feminist would have us all live as crazy politically correct commies and the alt right would have us live in some Hitler youth recruitment ad.
>>38682681
No. They've been voting Democrat since Davis iirc.
>>38681886
>Thinking intelligent people would fall for the lack of self-awareness authoritarianism implies.
Haha you funny, mane.
>>38681772
Pretty sure no one thinks they don't exist. I think they mean the importance on them is social and nothing more.
>>38681189
I'm close to Gandhi. And I'm in the top 3% of my uni.
>>38682385
stirner is dumb and his theories are like proving that the sun shines but that gets you nowhere
>>38683550
>stirner is dumb but correct
lolk