>R. Kelly is being accused of holding women in a "cult" where he dictates everything from what they can wear and eat to their sexual behavior and controls any communication they have with the outside world
>"You have to ask for food. You have to ask to go use the bathroom_ a master at mind control. ... He is a puppet master," said Mack. Mack is a woman previously in his sex cult.
>According to Mack, Jones and McGee, there was a 31-year-old "den mother" who recently vacated Kelly's residence. The women claim there is currently a 25-year-old woman, a 19-year-old model, a 26-year-old aspiring singer and an 18-year-old singer living with the R&B artist.
>"It was as if she was brainwashed. [She] looked like a prisoner. It was horrible. I hugged her and hugged her. But she just kept saying she's in love and [Kelly] is the one who cares for her. I don't know what to do. I hope that if I get her back, I can get her treatment for victims of cults,"
>Kelly beats them if they do something he doesn't approve, like talking to other men he doesn't like.
This is the true nature of women. Women will not have sex with you even if you offer nicely, but they will be the sex slave of Chad. They will alow Chad to beat him, allow Chad to control their social lives, allow Chad to punish them with starvation and other tortures, etc.
This proves that women have no free will. They are just machines programmed to look for a puppetmaster and after they find their puppet master they become the puppets they really are, with no agency.
Source of the story:
If you are a cuck then you can find it in HuffPost.
If you are uncucked the Fox news also has reported on it.
>This proves that women have no free will.
This is nothing new, have you ever heard of a pimp? Someone with RKs power level would easily be a super pimp.
If a broke dirty nigga can control a dozen bitches you can only imagine what a RnB god can do. I salute him honestly, they obviously wanted, the one that told probably just didn't get her way now shes doing what woman do and placing all the blame on the man after he used her up.
>>38439708
>This is nothing new,
I know, but if women have no free will and are subhuman (meant to be the puppets of men) then why do we give them rights?
I think we can make a good case to take away women's rights with this.
>>38439776
lol would never happen. lets just let them continue pretenting to be sentient beings while we fill their holes with cock and cum
>>38439829
>lets just let them continue pretenting to be sentient beings while we fill their holes with cock and cum
But this is potentially dangerous. To point out why, imagine what would happen if tigers had human rights.
In our normal word, if a tiger out of nowhere appears in your house and starts fucking things up, as that tiger has no legal rights, you can just pull out your shotgun and blow its head off.
Now imagine the same scenario but in a world where tigers have rights. You would have to call the police and wait them out because if you kill the tiger then you are guilty of murder. Then after the tiger has been captured by the police, he has the legal right to a fair trial, which can take months.
In those months, how many people do you think the tiger managed to kill? Probably at least 100 people. All because we gave rights to an irrational beast. Well, that is exactly what we do with women.
In a normal world, when women reject you, you should be able to just pull out your gun and murder her. But we can't, and so we let those disgusting beings roam the end, killing other men inside with no consecuence. And if you want to sue her for psychological damage she has the right to an investigation and a trial, which means she would have at least 2 more years to keep damaging people.
IT IS IRRATIONAL.
>>38439902
Blame the white knights. Doesn't matter how many times they're mauled by tigers. They'll defend them forever.