Did god ONLY create 2 humans or did he create a lot more later on? if he didn't doesn't that mean we're all giga inbreds with severe retardation or something? What did he use as the base for our dna?
>>38054744
Do you know where you're posting?
Are you stupid or am I the stupid one for taking the bait?
Monkeys and a "pure" blood
>>38054744
Eve vagina and Adam sperm was quite special
every kid they had, had different DNA, Eve had many babies and everytime had twins (one boy one girl), and the first twins marry second twins and it continues, so it isn't incest
>>38054744
>What did he use as the base for our dna?
iirc he made us in his image so I suppose he was the base for our DNA.
At least for men anyway. Eve was made out of Adam's left rib.
Used to have a priest reasoning along the lines of the earth being extremely cloudy until noah's flood which would stop mutations from happening. Remember most kids bought that
>>38054744
The reason why inbreeding is so bad these days is because of negative recessive genes appearing more easily when both parents have the potential for it. Adam and Eve had perfect DNA, without such problems. The further we strayed from God, the more our DNA developed imperfections.
>>38054771
what do you mean fampai? im trying to figure these memes out but your comment isn't helping.
>>38054784
what made them different? how come people get giga autistic from long term inbreeding now if they still have DNA from adam and eve?>>38054834
does that mean I'm part god? thats nuts
>>38054744
Isn't DNA just a evil science lie put there by the devil?
>>38054744
Inbreeding after several generations actually becomes genetically beneficial since relatives as far out as 3rd cousins essentially become genetically unique enough that the chances of retardation occurring is extremely low. The benefit is also that 3rd cousins are found to have the most reproductive success as opposed to people very far unrelated or too closely related.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/when-incest-is-best-kissi/
>>38054870
I don't believe so, no. I strongly feel that DNA is evidence of intelligent design. You are free to believe what you want though, as you know.
>>38054904
>scientificamerican
Lmaoing at burgers trying to defend kissing their cousins
>>38054945
If you believe in self replicating DNA you might as well believe that it makes a mistake in it's replication process once in a while, and then you get a random mutation, that get's an selective adavanatge in it's environment, and then you arrive at evolution. It's a slippery slope man.
>>38054744
>What did god use as the base for DNA?
Adenine Thymine Guanine and Cytosine.
>>38054977
It's a study based in iceland you retarded europoor
>>38054977
http://science.sciencemag.org/content/319/5864/813
And here's the source since you're so fucking lazy to do a google search you just write it off based on the url.
>>38054977
Yes Hans, German women should be breeding and marrying with Middle Eastern refugees! They're much less likely to be related than another German ethnic. Race mixing is the future! What a great opportunity your selfless leader has thrusted upon your country.
>>38054744
doG just grabbed the 4 closest things to it, squished them together and kobe'd a rock into a warm rock a couple billion years later. All just to start a new hit comedy show
>>38055542
>42
>hitchhikers guide to the galaxy