>he's a digitaI "artist" who produces

Digital art means digital painting among other things, which is indeed art.

And then OP was never heard from again, as he apparently had completely neglected to consider that digital painting falls under digital art.

yes, it's also my job

>>37930809
>>37931077
Are there techniques in digital painting that are completely unanalogous in the real world, and therefore must be done through a digital medium

or does it really mean
>he's a digitaI "autist" who produces digital "autism"

>>37931122
It may be theoretically possible to do all the same things, but even then it won't look the same.

>>37931168
You mean, it would look like it wasn't shat out of MS Paint or wat

File: 1.jpg (953KB, 1750x1080px) Image search: [Google]

953KB, 1750x1080px

>>37931183
Have you really never seen digital paintings?

>>37931231
>row of dicks
A+ art

>>37931312
>durr digital art is bad because i interpret normal objects as dicks
That's enough 4chan for me today. I might get brain damage at this rate.

>>37931338
Go out to a museum and see real art.

>>37931085
How much do you make?

ori

bad art is still art

art doesn't stop being art just because you don't like it

>>37931526
>art
The word you're looking for is "drawings".

>>37931924
all drawings are art

>>37930779
>tfw can only draw by hand and suck with digital works
The future has long past me

File: eb8979058faaf4de9534013d90b4aa91c12f2b75193483276bc1e35c0e915add.jpg (49KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 1280x720px

>>37932045
>toddlers are all artists

File: b740ea56e05e72c5777d17c95c0c0194.jpg (13KB, 236x325px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 236x325px

>>37930779
"art isn't subjective guys, i'm smarter than you!!!!! haha!!!!!!!"

if you don't like "digital art" than say goodbye to all your music, videos, movies and anime. you fucking retard.

>>37932095
Most people can run, that doesn't mean most people are runners. Creating art doesn't necesserally mean you're an artist

>>37932146
>say goodbye to all your music
BYE, FRUITY LOOPS NIGGER MUSIC

>>37931085
Same. And I can tell you OP, most digital artists know traditional mediums as well. The fact of the matter is we can paint digitally faster and it's a million times easier to make corrections a client or art director want. Doesn't mean we don't appreciate or respect traditional though, and it's extremely necessary to have a traditional foundation if you want to be a pro.

File: 347ba13ccabea802c4b0930359ba32b1802e2f597ede53fe27392166304f9c91.jpg (422KB, 3300x1600px) Image search: [Google]

422KB, 3300x1600px

>>37932212
>toddlers all create art

File: smuglook.png (190KB, 421x516px) Image search: [Google]

190KB, 421x516px

>>37932146
>!!!!!
>!!!!!!!
Relax, artist.

File: Dissapointed frog.jpg (25KB, 303x303px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 303x303px

>>37932146
>his music isn't AAA

File: 2smug4u.png (220KB, 461x540px) Image search: [Google]

220KB, 461x540px

>>37932232
>it's a million times easier
I know.

>>37932218
I don't think you understand. nigger music isnt the only thing that's digital. Anything made after the 80's falls under the category of "digital" with the synths and new technology for microphones and audio engineering. EVERYTHING is digital.

>>37932318
>all synthesizers are digital
>EVERYTHING is digital
easy there computer nerd

>>37930779

>retard tried this on /ic/
>got slammed

>"whelp, guess I'll go back to my shit board instead"

File: c1a4a946c53fa0e2e5c4a6bc12643a673397377b3ea9d7477944b4db9109a848.png (282KB, 796x534px) Image search: [Google]

282KB, 796x534px

>>37932318
>EVERYTHING is digital.
Not the symphonies I listen to and the kinography I watch, you pleb.

>>37932241
People put the word "art" in a pedestal. Yes, toddlers all create art.

>>37932366
/ic/ is digital pleb territory and I did get silenced by the plebeian mods. I still triggered you though so it was worth it.

>>37932367
how do you think you're able to listen to it inside your basement? idiot.

>>37932432
It wasn't produced digitally, you pleb.

>>37932367
They are recorded and mixed digitally though.

>>37932448
>i don't know anything about digital remasters and how analogue is converted to digital.

>>37932496
>remasters
>converted
Key words, my mentally impaired friendo.

>>37932529
Unless you're listening on vinyl and watching on film stock you're enjoying digital conversions.

>>37932529
You obviously don't understand it. Stay pseudointellectual my friend.

>>37932596
>conversions
Key word, my mentally impaired friendo.

>>37932599
What matters is how it was produced.

>>37932716
Do you think digital conversions are lossless or something?

>>37931085
How does it compare to being a chef at wendy's?

>>37931361

>Go out to a museum to see replicas of famous art

>>37932790
Any museum worth shit has original pieces.

>>37932318
>he doesn't listen to polka music at his local Midwestern townhall
What is wrong with you?

>>37932738
What matters is how it was initially produced, it doesn't matter how it looks like now.

>>37932738
>lossless
These words mean nothing to plebs
>>37930779
You just made this thread last night and you're still mad? What digital artist fucked your oneitis friend? Why so buttmad
>>37931122
Yes.

>>37932902
>Yes.
What are they?

File: C__Data_Users_DefApps_AppData_INTERNETEXPLORER_Temp_Saved Images_1497044400117.png (1MB, 900x1259px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 900x1259px

>>37932925
A wealth of different brushes makes producing faster and with strokes they wouldn't have otherwise considered, a pallet with the same qualities leading to colors they wouldn't have considerered, an undo function that is critical to learning/producing because the real life equivalent is painting over your mistakes, and no one wants a part with a nipple of paint protruding from their piece.
And above all, a cleanness in end product that traditional can't compete with, that make digital stand out as industry standard for concept art these days. Oil can come close and usually can replicate light and skin tones more accurately to real life, but as far as sharpness, immediate brightness, texture, all of these things are more immediately done in digital and comes out a way that no serious oil/acrylic painter does/even wants to do. Most of it just comes down to speed. Pic related couldn't look the way it does in traditional mediums.
For the record, I prefer traditional though.

>>37933106
>and no one wants a part with a nipple of paint protruding from their piece
Okay, I'll just take those Van Goghs that nobody wants

>>37932218
1.) Electronic music doesn't have to be 'fruity loops nigger music,' it can actually be quite complex
2.) very low quality b8, please try harder next time

>>37933266
w-what?! I think this was the low-quality bait thread! excuse me!
what shall we do to restore the level of discourse?

File: Ruan Jia.jpg (114KB, 850x1144px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 850x1144px

>>37933168
Well clearly that kind of thing isn't frowned upon in fine art, but for modern applications like concept art, animation, different design fields, porn, etc. its all about cleanness, speed, and being able to learn from each other. Digital has taken over because if you want to work in these fields, you'd be fucking yourself over by not learning.
OP's probably just mad he shelled out money for a tablet, tried and failed instead of working on it. And I don't blam you.

>>37933266
This whole thread was a low-quality b8 meme

>>37933444
Next time start it on /ic/, that'll be a laugh

bump

uiehgwlhl

File: 354deaa3770912621bb816da070346ab.jpg (12KB, 258x245px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 258x245px

>tfw all these "Artists" are defending digital "art"
Just admit that you guys have no talent

File: smug.png (205KB, 425x509px) Image search: [Google]

205KB, 425x509px

>>37934080
They already did:
>>37932232
>it's a million times easier

>>37934080
easy = bad

>>37934323
yes

fgwjoae;

Remember guys, it's not art if it's easy.

>>37934905
Post some of your hard work, artist.

>>37934080
Im >>37933106
and>>37933343
and already acknowledged in the last thread it's mostly all insignificant soon to be forgotten shit.
Again, who hurt you pansy?
>>37934116
Not easier, just faster. For a traditional painter, acrylic is easier.
But I guess arguing with autistic serial masturbators that can't even draw even memes is bound to end up with their delusions taking place of an actual argument kek. You guys are cute.

>>37931183
>robots shitting on people with talent because they have none of their own

Classic /r9k/

>>37930779
Someone try posting this thread on /ic/ and see what happens

>>37935014
See >>37934998

ewrfwjog

>>37935036
OP here, I did so last night and got a warning.

>>37935059
That should have clued you in on the quality of the thread you were trying to make, fuckhead.

>>37932393
exactly, everyone can be an artist

doesn't mean it's '''good''' although that's subjective
>>37932241
>>37932095
dipshits

>>37935038
I'm not gonna post my own work because I'd hate to be associated with this board. I only have a small following though anyways.
And that's not how it works, you're the one making claims of "digital is easier, lmoa its nit art if its easy"
Nigger, to all artists of every skill level, they all consider what they do to be easy, just tedious if anything. But you'd never know because your skill level capped in middle school.

File: sakimi.jpg (446KB, 1889x1495px) Image search: [Google]

446KB, 1889x1495px

>>37930779
Digital art and art in general (same with music, acting, sports) is a profession with massive income inequality favoring the absolute best or most famous, the top 1%

There are thousands of artists making nothing or almost nothing, then there are people like Sakimichan making $300,000+ per year just to draw stuff (she hid her total but it was $25,000/month last time it was visible)

https://www.patreon.com/sakimichan

>>37935120
>I'd hate to be associated with this board
get out normie

>>37935120
>to all artists of every skill level, they all consider what they do to be easy

Factually incorrect

>>37935152
Nah bitch. Still >tfw no gf
so I'll stay thanks. But I do need to get back to work.

File: 1497897327713.jpg (4KB, 228x221px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 228x221px

>>37935133
ruined my day desu, delet this

File: smugaf.png (219KB, 591x557px) Image search: [Google]

219KB, 591x557px

>>37935231
He wouldn't know, he's a digital babby.

>>37935231
>Factually incorrect
I'm friends with a few working artists(not concept artists) that have toured the world and have gallery showings in major cities, and they are aware of their high skill level and how long it took, but it's just that they got their fundamentals down early and know what they're doing, so therefore its easy to them now.
They have great ego when it comes to their work, but they still think consider themselves to be "hacks".
They work in traditional mediums exclusively btw, and one doesn't even bother with color.
>>37935256
I've literally said I don't work in digital, and prefer traditional. Reading comprehension buddy. Get some.

Go away Jonny Neptune

File: head-of-an-angel-pietro-da-cortona.jpg (184KB, 799x900px) Image search: [Google]

184KB, 799x900px

Despite 50+ hours of work, a digital drawing will always look like an artificial cheap plastic turd compared to a mere sketch done with a pencil on a piece of paper in 5 mins.

>>37935256
You should know you're talking to someone with a couple thousand followers on social media who pays his bills by selling art. I think I know the field I work in better than you kid.

File: sakimichanreal.png (797KB, 815x612px) Image search: [Google]

797KB, 815x612px

>>37935133
>https://www.patreon.com/sakimichan

Looks like the lowest tier is $3/month and she has 4626 patrons = $13,878/month = $166,536/year minimum. That's bare minimum, and her top two patron tiers ($70/mo and $150/mo) are sold out...jesus

Looks like she is a Chinese girl in her 20s or 30s from Toronto. Damn, that bitch is rich

>>37935421
Again, the end goal is different. Typically digital artists are working toward animation or comic/manga styles.
Not many people are pursuing fine art through this. Did you know: the world of art isn't all people striving toward the same goal? Did you know: not everyone is trying to be Rembrandt? Like it's better to draw mechs in digital for obvious reasons, but initial sketches would best be done in pencil first.
You guys are just ignorant as fuck.

>>37935540
>yow ignowant!!

NICE argument dude

Digital haters BTFO
WILL THEY EVER RECOVER???

File: Top Keke _ Pepe the Frog _ Know Your Meme.jpg (21KB, 600x500px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 600x500px

>>37935568
Um.
The rest of the post was the argument, brainlet. Though I see you're conveniently ignoring that because you literally can't combat it. CUTE.

is inherent artistic talent real? Need to know if I should give up or keep going. No meme answers pls

>>37935634
um.

k.

bi :)

>>37935661
Yeah that's what I thought. Glad you know when to fall back kek.

Get in here boys: >>>/ic/3035046

origo

>>37935640
How long have you been drawing?
It's a series of learning and applying fundamentals. It should be easy if you're not trying to leap into realism instantly. You should strive for realism, but learn anatomy/framing it and how light works with shadow to get there, then move to color theory.
Anyone can draw, it just takes time to learn the basics. Some grasp it faster than others though. Most great artists of the past were on their way to mastery by the time they were 18, because they learned under ateliers. You can do it though.

Yall couldn't get more rekt, goddamn.

>>37930779
Just lurk on /ic/ and browse the beginner thread. Talent isn't real. Some people just draw for longer and it shows.

>>37932596
I unironically love my vinyl collection and will even stoop to listening to flac rips over bluetooth.

>>37931122
>Are there techniques in digital painting that are completely unanalogous in the real world, and therefore must be done through a digital medium

Yes. Why are you so stupid to not realize that in the first place?

>>37936800
>Why are you so stupid to not realize that in the first place?
I am a programmer, and I don't think there is anything special about computers.
What are those techniques?

>>37932925
undo
redo
cut
copy
paste

These alone make digital art a completely different process.

>>37936855
Is it made better, or just easier?

>>37936896
Neither. It's impossible to do those without a computer.

>>37936896
Arguably both, but that's not the point. It's a fundamentally different process.

>>37937101
>it's impossible to redo a drawing in real life
>it's impossible to burn your old drawings and undo them
>it's impossible to cut things real life
>it's impossible to make copies in real life
>it's impossible to glue things together in real life

I had a lot of fun posting this.

>>37937153
Stop being an idiot. If you are programmer (which I doubt at this point) you know there is no comparison between these actions and their traditional equivalent. There is no perfect undo/redo with real paint.

I'm pretty sure this whole thread is just a "pretending to be retarded" shitpost.

>>37937508
>Stop being an idiot.
No, I'm going to be an idiot forever and you can't stop me.
>I'm pretty sure this whole thread is just a "pretending to be retarded" shitpost.
People aren't retarded for thinking that digitally-produced works don't look as good as traditional media.
>There is no perfect undo/redo with real paint.
Stop making mistakes.
>I doubt at this point
check out this cool piece of code
< > ! * ' ' #
^ " ` $ $ -
! * = @ $ _
% * < > ~ # 4
& [ ] . > . /
| { , , SYSTEM HALTED

File: shamwow15n-1-web.jpg (24KB, 750x533px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 750x533px

is this art?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KAExa9P7hME

stop looking at pepe then OP

>>37938607
what did he meme by this?

giuhrtekjh

File: enhanced-mid-29607-1445980104-1.jpg (57KB, 500x499px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 500x499px

>>37938919

search ur feelinz u know it to be true.

>>37930779
b- but Im too poor to buy paint and canvas and shit. Creating stuff in digital is a lot cheaper and produces results faster. So whats wrong with that?

>>37939285
i dunno tho

oreo

>>37935487
x2 because anon messed up and she was making 25K bi-weekly

File: 1322796219001.png (57KB, 500x382px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 500x382px

>>37940320

He's been there for you.

origami

Are tablets a must?

>>37942254
Yes, it's part of the digital babby starter pack.

>>37930779
Yeah why not. What you don't think the ability to make a nice wallpaper compares to your ability to find a fucking rock and jut re-sell it for millions? Or can your shit in leaky aluminium cans? I am really impressed anon.

File: 3062298926_ec3dd15d8d_b.jpg (536KB, 900x675px) Image search: [Google]

536KB, 900x675px

meanwhile at OP's house.

originalio