What's the matter, /r9k/? Too mediocre for the Current Year?
>>37923787
>posting this
>at 0245
>>37923787
This shit is propaganda. Not to be taken seriously.
>>37923787
top kek how do they get away with such blatant lies?
>>37923787
Any sort of hiring quota guarantees that incompetent people will get jobs that they do not deserve, as it prevents employers from hiring purely on merit. There is zero evidence that diversity quotas provide any benefits whatsoever. On the contrary, gender quotas for executive boards has been shown to be detrimental to company performance.
>>37923787
>hire unqualified woman over qualified man because quotas
>it somehow makes the company better
Sure. It works so well for firefighters.
>>37923916
>firefighters
Any job that can be replaced by a robot is a job filled with inferior males.
>>37923963
>nuclear meltdown
>im hotspot areas radiation could kill you in a few seconds
>they send the robots in to clean up
Every time. Fucking robots stealing our work.
>>37923787
I guess that pic could be true for jobs involing next to 0 physical labour. But anything that requires you to lift, think or even show up all the time , you're probably better off hiring a man.
>disregard
>point and laugh
It's the Independent, pick one
I'd love to walk up to that stupid faggot and shoot him right in the fucking head.
>>37923787
post the study, I'm to lazy to look through the bullshit article
>>37924230
lets be real, any place that is going to have a nuclear meltdown isnt going to have invested the money into robots that are shielded from radiation(see Chernobyl/Fukishima) so people are getting fucked regardless.
Honestly I dont see how the fuck these futurist see an economy working in the future if robots take over everything. This is based on one thing, how the fuck are you going to convince a robot to buy a Ford? Obviously the response to this is some kind of communism but that has worked so well in the past we should really give it another go...