Atheism is a religion.
That is all, thanks.
I was going to make a thread anyway but this fits
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wc_PjDXs3Qs
Answer what this paki is saying.
tldr version, he says that there needed to be a first cause/mover and that logically nothing could have existed without a first cause. I'm trying to make sense of what is true and logical at the moment, I don't have any special love for religion or atheism for that matter, I just want to know what actually is.
I've tried this thread on other boards and never got a reasonable or logical answer, which makes me wonder if atheism can actually answer this paki. I guess I'll keep trying until something makes sense.
>>37751089
Weeeeeee! Autismo detected. Atheism (literally without god in Greek) is a religion. Just like bald is a hair colour or being a roastie is a different form of virginity.
what is an atheism
>>37751408
Atheism = Autheism = Autism.
just like gay sex is a different form of sex.
No it isn't. Fuck off, cunt.
>>37751602
>being this triggered summerfag
traps is a different form of women
"cheated on" is a different form of love
>>37751236
What is your question?
Are you trying to argue against the first cause/mover? Because you really can't.
Read Aquinas' Proofs.
if repeating digits god is real
>>37751089
>>>/b/
SAGED
Originalogia faggot
>>37752164
if at least quads then atheism is true
>>37751236
atheism is not the belief of the multiverse
>>37752082
I'm not arguing against it at all, I think you should read my comment again. I'm wondering if the paki has a point and if what he's saying *can* be refuted, not that *I'm* refuting it because my logic tells me he is right and that's scary in itself.
I'll check those out though.
Not collecting stamps is also a hobby.
>>37751236
Hey, it's the dad's sperm guy!
> finds fellowship with like-minded others
> defends philosophy with others
> believes their worldview is correct
At this point, the only difference is "I sleep in Sunday mornings"
>>37752723
Oh, in that case I agree with him that it cannot be refuted
But it also cannot be proven correct using external evidence. Such are the laws of this universe.
The evidence you seek lies within you, and it can be had. The Lord reveals Himself to those who seek Him.
"Openly appearing to those who look for Him with all their heart, while hiding from those who run from Him with all their heart, God governs human knowledge of His presence. He gives signs that are visible to those who search for Him, and yet invisible to those who are indifferent to Him. To those who wish to see, God gives sufficient light; to those who do not wish to see, He gives sufficient darkness." -Blaise Pascal
"Sufficient darkness" means that there will never be universal proof of God as long as there are those who do not wish to see. And at this time, their numbers far surpass the numbers of those who wish to see.
>>37752782
Tee hee hee lol upboat... yeah it's him, I know he's a fucking tool but this time he has a point.
>>37751089
Nice to see a fellow genius. Shadilay Op