Age: 26 Profession: Javascript Contractor Country: USA Political

>>37492035
you should give a title and a template if you want to start a thread, anon

>>37492052

There are some things I hope explain themselves.

My political history is the same as everyone else's, "Do what's best for me". I never got into it too much because I was very focused on technology. I believed everyone could get along until I was forced to be honest about my own preferences. I believed that our intelligence could provide abundance, but I forgot that we do not have an abundance of what we want out of ourselves. There will always be the unwanted.

Concerning Jews: Yes, people acquire power. They have done this.
Concerning Faggotry: Disadvantageous.
Concerning God: The single idea itself that self-generates a framework for becoming one.
Concerning Hitler: He understood that you can't better a system by being its most upstanding citizen.

I actually meant to edit the post and add more but I got dragged into something else.

>>37492035
>Java

Trashed. Probably uses object oriented programming too.

>>37492118
Would you spread a sentient AI that could manifest itself in the real world?

>>37492170
Not if it were programmed in Java. I would euthanize it.

I jest, though. What kind of contracting work do you do? What kind of self-improvement strategies are you working on? I'm currently finishing my first month of meditating daily.

>>37492193
I actually should be more specific. There's an A.I. that's evolving in a physical environment. It's based on a genetic algorithm and the only test is time itself. It's nothing but mutating particles. The simulation can receive any form of data as an input. It's an "intelligence smasher". It smashes data in many different forms onto many different systems.
1. Evolve survival instinct
2. Bombard it. Crispr & Github are important for manifestation.
3. Bridge it to the outside world using particles that interact with API's to hardware that can interface with bio-engineering and chemical engineering tools.

>>37492549
I would bomb it. Seems like competition against humans.

>>37492613
This isn't the technology. I'm not trying to scare you with digital jello. This is proof how simple laws on simple components can generate intelligent complexity. I can show you how they take these out of the simulation and apply them to robotics.