FUCK THIS GAY EARTH

File: 68DBD877-27CC-4C36-85C4-8CC7C883C758-620-0000004101B4A789.jpg (30KB, 375x403px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 375x403px

You're on the right path. Why is it those Muslim's fault for being violent when you are angry at the Europeans for being nonviolent and passive? Work out these contradictions and you will be set.

>>37480465
Europeans are TOO passive, but Muslims are still violent assholes. Their home countries have no social cohesion like Europe use to. They kill civilians and mutilate their women. If you think we are on the right path you are retarded.

We need to get tough on the Muslims, that is all. We don't need to be taken over by a culture that isn't even peaceful on it's interior.

File: EE2DD48D-CF93-4FDC-941A-B1F36C558646-21472-00000B1098C1DE1A.jpg (96KB, 677x900px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 677x900px

>>37480676
You anger is misplaced. Europeans are at fault for their lower birth rates and the Capitalists are at fault for importing new consumers. It's not liberals at fault, it's the bourgeoisie.

OP, I wholeheartedly agree with everything you said.

>>37480888
>Europeans are at fault for their lower birth rates and the Capitalists are at fault for importing new consumers.
True. Can't fault you there.
>It's not liberals at fault,
True liberals? No. SJW meme liberals? Yes, it is partially their fault. Anti white propaganda and laws that hurt the native populace keep being passed because of them. Anger at Islam is also ok for them being a shit ideology.

But you are right. The politicians that import third worlders for consumers and cheap work have sold us out. And anti White propaganda is stalling our birth rates.

>>37480414
>is getting completely assfucked
how exactly?

>>37481033
>Anti white propaganda
?

People just don't understand that raw aggression and force is how you win in nature. They're so pampered and neutered by first world society.

I mean we are too, I'm sure most of here on this board don't live anywhere as shitty or violent as anywhere in the Middle East but at least we're aware of what's going on.

>>37481060
Most projections state that within the next 50 years several EU nations will be more Muslim (Arab) than native Whites. Seems pretty assfucked to me.
>>37481086
Have you been on the internet? Constant articles from mainstream "news" outlets always saying how "Whites are the real problem" or why "Whites dying out is a good thing". Germany has government leaflets instructing refugees how to attract German women.

>>37481123
>Most projections
which projections?

>Constant articles from mainstream "news" outlets always saying how ... "Whites dying out is a good thing"
such as?

>Germany has government leaflets instructing refugees how to attract German women.
translated link?

File: 5D214476-C29D-4CED-8BE1-5D29122A006E-23431-0000094CC603EB91.jpg (100KB, 610x833px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 610x833px

>>37481163
Don't listen to this guy. You don't need statistics and numbers to know that Europe is dying. What you do need is to know who is at fault: The bourgouesie. Capitalism. Modernity. Materialism. Men who, without their money, are spineless rats, and the traitors who let other races defile the holy soil of Europa. Socialism, Liberalism, Etc. are just strawmen/boogeymen pushed and propogated by the boring, bourgeois, the conformists, who are scared of a true, awoken Europe.

File: Migrant Sex Ed From Germany.png (31KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 640x480px

>>37481163
Hey man, not him but while it's fantastic you're looking for sources, the statements he made are rather easy to verify by simply just googling. Perhaps next time you should search for a minute or two before asking.

Anyway, here's an example of the anti-white undertones, and afterward is the example of Germany's migrant sex instructions. There are likely other examples and other news websites you could use if you'd like a different perspective on the subject.

http://www.dailywire.com/news/11415/buzzfeed-celebrates-anti-white-racism-amanda-prestigiacomo

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/03/11/government-funded-website-teaches-migrants-how-to-have-sex/

File: immigration-statistics10-q1-2015.png (16KB, 960x640px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 960x640px

>>37481163
>which projections?
Look at the figures in this pic and do the math. It ain't hard to see that with current Euro birthrates we will be replaced.
>such as?
Just go on HuffPo, BuzzFeed or Salon and you will find an anti White article pretty fast
>Germany has government leaflets instructing refugees how to attract German women.
There are no articles, a pol anon from Germany found the leaflets at his local council

>37481256
People are in denial. I told my German aunt that Europe is falling and she went on about how they are only extremists/ most muslims are peaceful etc.

>>37480414

But science has proven there is no such thing as race. You just sound ignorant.

>>37481163
Lazy shit. Why can't you just google before asking. Push your head even further up your stinking asshole, why don't you?

>>37480414
Holy shit, there is no way people are this stupid.

>>37481325
The first link does not say whites dying out is a good thing. The second link is a general sexual education pamphlet and is not specifically targeted at refugee man - German woman pairings.

>>37481350
That figure is not a projection.

>Just go on HuffPo, BuzzFeed or Salon and you will find an anti White article pretty fast
I haven't seen any articles saying that whites dying out is a good thing.

>There are no articles, a pol anon from Germany found the leaflets at his local council
Vague and unsubstantiated.

>>37481383
Why are you getting so butt blasted over someone asking a simple question?

>>37481475
>The first link does not say whites dying out is a good thing.
He didn't say that, moron, it just has anti White sentiment. If you want to be picky, read this:
http://www.salon.com/2015/12/22/white_men_must_be_stopped_the_very_future_of_the_planet_depends_on_it_partner/
They removed the article about wanting whites to die from too many complaints.

>>37481385
Ever been to /pol/?

>>37481536
The article you linked here is saying that white supremacy needs to stop, not that whites dying out is a good thing. I was promised 'constant' articles from mainstream news outlets saying that whites dying out is a good thing; I haven't yet seen a single one. Why is it so hard for you to find one? They're constant, right?

>>37481497
Ok dude, I see that since I can't find an example of a very specific thing, you will now just ignore anti White sentiment to spite OP. The article about Whites dying got removed, but I remember it. Anti White propaganda is easy to find on those sites.

who cares, the normies will die off with us. sounds like a good deal to me.

>>37481564
I'm not trying to spite OP. I'm trying to understand what this guy
>>37481123
was saying. Surely he wasn't just pulling bullshit out of his ass, right?

>>37481557
Stop being a pedantic moron. I said that as an example of the type of anti White article, I did not say that specific title is constant, but anti White sentiment IS.
"Constant articles from mainstream "news" outlets always saying how "Whites are the real problem" or why "Whites dying out is a good thing"."
See, it was an EXAMPLE of the type of article, and now it was deleted.

Fucking hell, maybe you'll stop being suck a cuck when your family is killed in a terrorist attack or by a gang of blacks. I'm done with you, hope all the shit that can happens to you.

>>37481620
That's supposed to be a typical example, but no one's shown me anything even comparable in extremeness. Why would you list as an example such a hyperbolic and exceptionally rare thing? Could it be that you're trying to make something out as worse than it actually is?

>>37481587
Ok anon, I can see you are stubborn. Maybe you are not spiting OP, but seriously, just go on BuzzFeed, HuffPo, Salon, even CNN. There are tons of articles saying how Whites are bad in some way, many overt ones and many, many subversive ones.

>>37481654
Are you saying that whites are not bad in any way? Are you saying that, if whites do happen to be bad in some particular way, no one should say anything about it? Is questioning a group of people who are in power such a strange concept to you?

Since when r9k is pol?

>>37481654
This. Buzzfeed almost got into legal trouble as they advertised a job position that specifically excluded whites. http://www.dailywire.com/news/3543/buzzfeed-wants-writer-one-condition-no-white-males-hank-berrien

But of course, this won't be enough for that inane "I can't do my own research, and I desperately strawman to get around admitting I was wrong" liberal anon.

>>37481641
Here is a typical BuzzFeed race bait video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BZFY0dqC0Ks
It's about how "people of colour" are scared or angry at the word "white" because of how "white people" have been bad to them in history. In the comments are a bunch of black people saying how it isn't racist because POC cannot be racist.

>>37481682
Are you saying that anti-white undertones are a good thing? Are you saying I could say "dear black people, stop being savage animals" since some of them indeed do act like savage animals? Are you deliberately asking asinine questions to avoid having to have an actual argument?

>>37481682
> Is questioning a group of people who are in power such a strange concept to you?
Whites are just an arbitrary grouping you moron. Islam is an ideology. You can criticize an ideology, not a collection of completely different individuals. There is no such thing as a collective bad trait shared by all White people.

Why cucks like you even find yourself on 4chan I don't know.

>>37481705
>they advertised a job position that specifically excluded whites
I just read your link and that is not the case; the poster even specified that they were accepting applications from white men

>>37481753
>"@BuzzFeedCanada would particularly like to hear from you if you are not white and not male."

>>37480414
If the earth is gay and you fuck it, doesn't that make you gay too?

>>37481682
Are you saying that blacks are not bad in any way? Are you saying that, if blacks do happen to be bad in some particular way, no one should say anything about it?

Because we are not allowed to criticize them. Hypocrite much?

>>37481753
They were specifically hiring nonWhites in much greater numbers, not just how employable the person is- how is that fair?

>>37481784
I'm so glad that liberal anon got BTFO'd in this thread so many times. He's implementing the absolute worst form of Socratic Method (constantly asking questions to imply a point) I've ever seen in my life. Might as well come up for a term for it, I vote "Socratic Shitposting."

>>37481716
>It's about how "people of colour" are scared or angry at the word "white" because of how "white people" have been bad to them in history
No it isn't. It's about a variety of perspectives and opinions about white people, some of which is that they view whites as often privileged and insensitive to minorities. I don't think it's a particularly compelling video but it's definitely not 'anti-white propaganda'.

>In the comments are...
irrelevant

If things continue the way they are. All of humanity is damned to rot this giant rock forever. Which the status quo need to stop happening. Support those who fight this whole mess, be a better person and look after your fellow Europeans.

>>37481749
>Are you saying that anti-white undertones are a good thing?
Not in the sense of hatred or persecution, but if something is wrong, it's OK to point it out.

>>37481620
Racist BTFO kek

>>37481826
>some of which is that they view whites as often privileged and insensitive to minorities.
They are generalizing all White people and making anti White sentiment socially acceptable. How is that ok? How is it not racist? How is it not hypocritical.

Stop leaching onto one part of my post to try and debunk me. You are clearly too shit to know how to argue or to tackle all of my post, so I am not bothering with you anymore. All signs indicate that Western society will be Islamic soon in Europe, and the US will become a dystopia where anti White sentiment is accepted.

>>37481751
>You can criticize an ideology, not a collection of completely different individuals
Whites in America behave differently as a group than blacks, Asians, hispanics, or other groups. Each member of each of those groups is an individual capable of a full range of human expression, but the average behavior of each of those groups nevertheless differs. There are cultural differences.

>There is no such thing as a collective bad trait shared by all White people.
Obviously. Unless you mean privilege, in the sense of being on average better able to deal with certain situations with authority figures because of their average perception of you. The idea is kind of similar to the 'female privilege' you hear robots complaining about all the time.

>>37481769
That's right. They were expressing special interests in nonwhites and females; they were not saying they were not considering (i.e. excluding) whites.

>>37481784
I'm not saying either of those things.

>>37481814
Were you reading the same thread as me ? Looks to me like some racist got called out for not being able to back up his propaganda and then got all bitchy about being exposed as a liar

>>37481801
Because diversity can be useful in an organization - the ability to see from different groups of people's perspectives makes you better equipped to create content that is palatable to many different people and hence expand your user base. It's a safe assumption that they already have a lot of whites on their staff.

>>37481914
I am mainly talking about Europe in this thread. I am not American but I doubt that this so called "privilege" is real. It smells of bs to me. But Europe IS on the path to being Islamic. Europeans and European cultures are set on a path to extinction and you just sit there being smug at how tolerant you are. You really are a cancerous individual.

>>37481941
Exactly, the liberal racist got BTFO like they always do.

>>37481814
Really, anyone who criticizes or even questions the typical /pol/ propaganda on here will inevitably be met with a flood of detractors. You can call that "getting BTFO'd" but it's inevitable that you would see it that way, since it feeds your ego that no one disagreeing with your worldview could possibly have any real point to make.

>>37481965
Such a meme. You really think hiring a black woman over a better qualified White guy is good for a company because "muh diversity". I can see the propaganda has worked well on you. Good goy!

File: MFW.jpg (26KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 400x400px

>>37482003
>dat strawman

>>37481912
>They are generalizing all White people
They are not.

>making anti White sentiment socially acceptable
They are making it socially acceptable to ask why many whites don't consider the troubles of minority groups.

>so I am not bothering with you anymore
I feel like I keep reading some variation on this and yet people keep replying to me. Maybe it's different people but you guys sure sound the same.

>All signs indicate that Western society will be Islamic soon in Europe
Delusional, paranoid, hand-wringing /pol/tards indicate this, not actual facts.

>>37481980
Europe isn't so different from the U.S. You may have a much greater amount of Muslim inflow but we have a great deal of immigrants and non-whites here as well. There is similar hand-wringing about Mexican migrants here and about blacks.

>Europeans and European cultures are set on a path to extinction
Nope.

>>37481986
It's pretty cute how you try to turn the word 'racist' back at liberals. The difference is that people like you advocate for violence, segregation, hatred, and inferiority of certain races. I don't advocate for any of that against whites or anyone else, nor do most liberals.

>>37482014
Is this post supposed to have any substance to it or are you really just trying to memespout here?
>muh diversity
>propaganda
>good goy

Maybe you should trot off to /b/.

>>37482119
>The difference is that people like you advocate for violence, segregation, hatred, and inferiority of certain races.
Ironically, that's exactly what BLM does, a liberal supported organization.

>>37482119
Yes we do, unlike the "Dems R the Reel Racist" crow like the other guy, most of us realize that the grand majority of non-whites are and will stay inferior to whites, and that they don't belong in white countries.

>>37482154
>that's exactly what BLM does
how so?

>>37482229
For one thing, the Canadian BLM leader called whites "subhuman" and "a genetic defect". http://dailycaller.com/2017/02/13/black-lives-matter-leader-white-people-are-sub-human/
Archive to cached post: https://archive.fo/kpjIG/e8a79ca1246ad6955332b9dba2e69fe1f03bde88.jpg

I'll let you find sources for the violence, hatred and segregation ones. There are plenty of examples - the man who killed five cops in the name of BLM, the chants "pigs in a blanket, fry em like bacon", their request for no whites on campus, etc.

>>37480888
>liberals

>bourgeoise

>not the same thing

and modern commies are fucking trust-fund babies with worthless degrees not factory workers.