While walking through a market on vacation, you notice a small

>>37468463
None! The shopkeeper will give you back their bullshit currency as change.

>>37468463
$95 obviously original nalt

>>37468463
I think it's 80 bucks

Price of the set: 310

Camera is 300 more than the case and case is the cost of the set minus camera price

Price of camera is 290
So case costs 310-290=20 bucks

You gave him 100 so he should be giving you 80 in change

>>37468463
90
the price of the set is not the sum of the prices of the individual parts

>>37468463
It's obviously 90
People who get it wrong are litteral retards

y = 100 - x
x + (x + 300) = 310
x = (310 - 300)/2
x = 5
y = 95

File: Kizuna_1794a8_6240324.jpg (50KB, 595x441px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 595x441px

>>37468531
>>37468561
>>37468565

camera = case + 300
case = 310 - camera
~
camera = 310 - camera + 300
2 camera = 610
camera = 305
case = 5

you guys are seriously stupid

>>37468463
YOU LIGHT THE MATCH FIRST
NEXT RIDDLE, PROF.

Lets make it simple for you brainlets

Cost of set (Camera+Bag): $310 as stated here
>A camera- and-case set is selling for $310

And now the camera is $300 more than the case.
>The seller tells you that the camera costs $300 more than the case itself

NOW STOP

THIS PART RIGHT HERE YOU CAN SOLVE IT USING SIMPLE MATH AND LOGIC.
You do not need any more information, the rest if extra shit you skim over. It's easy arithmetic from now.

Since the camera costs $300 more than the case itself and the set is $310, you subtract the cost of the camera from the set to find the case value.

Or in simple terms: $310 (x+y)-300(y)= Case value, or x. Which is simply $10.


It's an easy question you should get right in 10 seconds after reading that part or you'd never score good on an ACT, SAT, or entrance exam.

File: 1486281170500.gif (35KB, 256x192px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 256x192px

>>37468719
Yeah, that's what I did, but the website says that you'll be getting $95 in change, whereas in your case, we'd be getting $90.

http://layton.wikia.com/wiki/Puzzle:The_Camera_and_Case

File: 10UPj7j.png (798KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

798KB, 1920x1080px

>>37468719
>10 dollars
>camera costs 300 dollars more than the case, so 310 dollars

suddenly set costs 320 thanks to your flawless calculations

How fucking dense are you?

File: 3425345634.png (329KB, 817x431px) Image search: [Google]

329KB, 817x431px

>>37468719
beep beep retard detected

>American education
>"simple arithmetic"
>gets it wrong

set = 310
camera is 300 more than the case

therefore

case = 5
camera=305

=310

>>37468463

I dunno, what kind of camera are talking about here? I'm going to want specs and time to do some comparisons before I even think about spending that kind of money.

This reminds me of the GRE quantitative section. It's all riddle bullshit to me.

>>37468719
why type so much when you're so dumb lmao

The answer is 5.

t. person who played the professor layton games