This is you. This is how dumb you sound.

>>37251962
i read that as 'manlets are so efficient'
i really gotta spend less time on 4chan

Nothing wrong with investing in PR and advertisement.

>>37251962
it's dumb wageslaves keeping things inefficient with their entitlement complaint, unsatisfactory labor, and work "accidents"
soon as we roboticize and waste these fucks we can really get going on terraforming mars or whatever the fuck

File: 1485211316834.jpg (44KB, 460x460px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 460x460px

>>37251962
>tfw national socialism was the height of development and technology until capitalist porkies and their commie kike puppets ruined everything by starting ww2

>>37252002
You were not the only one.

>>37252002
>burn less calories
>take up less space
>use less resources
Tell me again how manlets aren't efficient?

>>37251962
Except that by forcing companies to compete you end up with superior innovation. Do you think companies like Apple and Microsoft and Google spend billions on R&D because they think coming up with new gadgets is fun? Or is it because they want to generate a competitive advantage?

>>37252198
It doesn't matter how few resources something uses, if it can't get the job done and reproduce, then it's all a waste.

File: A9POPPn.png (173KB, 346x392px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 346x392px

>>37251962
You know what else is inefficient? This meme.
The CHUDs who are at the point that they spout 'muh free market' are either doing it cynically - in which case they have no interest in refuting anticapitalist economic theory - or they're just plain pants-on-head retarded. Anticapitalists should stop acting so sanctimonious that they alienate people who might otherwise be interested in an alternative analysis of political economy.

>>37251962
Will classcucks ever recover?

File: fagit.png (654KB, 523x817px) Image search: [Google]

654KB, 523x817px

>>37252214
>Except that by forcing companies to compete you end up with superior innovation
>superior innovation
Innovation in capitalist markets is, by definition, only coincidentally beneficial to the public - if at all. You just described it yourself; companies are forced to find new ways to generate an advantage on the market. That doesn't mean, however, that the ultimate product is the one that most benefits you or I, it is what benefits, say, Apple's ability to make more money off of their products. This includes the collection and sale of data that the customer stores on one of their devices. While that's a benefit to Apple as well as advertising agencies, is that really a benefit to us?

>muh competition
literally chadonomics
lets not base our livelihoods on ballsport ideology

File: 1495323310673.jpg (131KB, 1305x892px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 1305x892px

National Bolshevism is the best ideology, it rejects liberalism of both kinds - cultural and economic. No more to SJWs and no more to libertardians! Hail Stalin & Hitler! May the Motherland prosper!

>>37252002
samemost

File: IMG_3608.jpg (52KB, 640x322px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 640x322px

>>37252576
Nazbol gang is here : DDD

>>37252576
cool it with the cringe, dude

>>37251962
this is a strawman of me. This is how dumb I would sound if my opinions and arguments were deliberately degraded to a point of which it sounds like an idiotic idea, but it still fails to grasp the concept as a whole, thus making it an inefficient, wasted, and poorly made caricature. Of me.

>>37252678

Rootless cosmopolitans like yourself will be hanging in the gulags

>>37252635

National Bolshevism is a legit ideology and it's currently rising around the world. We out-number the /leftypol/ retards and we will continue to grow. However, you will continue to shitpost while we will rule Russia when Putin is overthrown by us.

>>37251962
If two different groups work on the same thing, they'll often find out different things about that one thing. This, effectively, doubles the ideas being thrown around. Now, one could argue, "Everyone working together would produce the same result". And to that I say, you've clearly never worked under a leader or as a part of a team. If you waste time going against the grain to figure something else out, you'll get yelled at.

So, by this posts logic, we're right.

>>37252413
Except that capitalism is not supposed necessarily better or efficient than socialism. Communism in theory is more efficient because everything is centralized and better controlled. But that is the point, centralization gives one entity complete control over produce, and in effect the country which is obviously bad. This means that the leader has complete control over the people and can restrict their freedom of the people how they see fit. See: any communist country ever.

>>37252413
So because when companies compete they don't focus their energies on generating benefit for themselves before generating benefit for the public, companies are inherently bad? That's just silly. Companies that are privately owned have no responsibility to devote their resources to enriching the public, that's what they pay taxes to the government for. The purpose of a company is to enrich the stakeholders of that company, and while society as a whole benefits from the productive power of private companies, it should never be forgotten that companies exist to provide benefit to their stakeholders first and foremost. I don't think that is a bad thing at all.

File: 1467854691195.gif (948KB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

948KB, 640x360px

>>37253476
I don't necessarily think it's bad either. I was simply pointing out that the 'superior innovation through competition' meme that's often trotted out is contradictory to the sentiment of the argument. While capitalism has provided us with innovations that improve the quality of our lives, there's no inherent social value within the 'competition' that capitalist markets drive. It could just as likely lead to scientific and productive advancement as they could to retardation - and it often does! If you live in America, try making sense of your next cable bill. If Standard Oil hadn't been broken up, your computer might be backlit by a kerosene lamp, and we'd all go blind by the age of 50.

File: Obesity_Starvation-LR.jpg (576KB, 1671x1009px) Image search: [Google]

576KB, 1671x1009px

Capitalist """efficiency"""

Really gets the neurons firing.

>>37251962

>waste labor power

Gas marxists when?

>>37253774
1933-1945. Get cracking on that time machine anon.

>>37251962
No it actually isn't me, don't tell me who I am. Everyone has made a habit of doing that to everyone else, and look what's happened. It's fucking dumb. So stop.

>>37252748
Tbh Im fine with anyone who will eliminate kikes
Nazbols are fun to bully but youre better than most

>>37251962
Markets are more efficient than government compulsion.

>>37252002
same, anon. What the fuck kind of short-man-syndrome font is that any ways

File: KWtKqAC.jpg (55KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 960x960px

Is /leftypol/ ever going to admit that supporting Russia for "anti imperialist" reasons is total bullshit and Russia is just another imperialist that tries to install right wing nut jobs in foreign countries?

File: you.gif (804KB, 350x215px) Image search: [Google]

804KB, 350x215px

>>37253983
You're confusing tankies - characteristically the most annoying, aggressive, autistic voice within the communist left - for the entire left. They essentially get sexual pleasure from the tactile stimulation of viewing a May Day parade or some shit.

File: RIDF.jpg (97KB, 892x960px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 892x960px

>>37254147
I just don't get how Russian propaganda is so effective on people on the far left (tankies) and the far right (fascists).

>>37254289
I honestly don't think it's a horseshoe correlation so much as they have a similar psychological need for affirmation from a 'powerful figure' (read: father). Russian art, politics, and literature is unusually centered around the need for a strong leader in the form of one man. That's true of Russian culture before, during, and after the Soviet period.