>Accidently liked her picture from 4 years ago

>>37024198
so unlike it

>>37024198
Like them all; claim that facebook suggested you might like them, and you thought she had recently posted them.

File: 1477491108600.png (261KB, 374x363px) Image search: [Google]

261KB, 374x363px

>>37024198
>it's a bikini pic from when she was underage

>>37024281

Post this comment: "DId you just post this? You look like you haven't changed in years! :-)"

File: 1494717615678.jpg (47KB, 475x413px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 475x413px

>>37024198
>accidentally like her picture
>remember i'm on a sock puppet account

>>37024310
Post at 3am for best results

>>37024218
but she will get the notification and it will show up in the timeline regardless

File: 7PZ2ISmm.png (128KB, 502x512px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 502x512px

>>37024198
Why are you using normiebook?

>>37024198
It's really not worth the risk of going through old photo albums just because of this.

There's really no believable way of explaining that.

>>37024310
Also write: *tips fedora* haha

File: 772.jpg (53KB, 597x519px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 597x519px

>>37024198
Just got a message from a girl asking why I keep saving her photos. I didn't even know that people got notifications for that

> not stalking them on an account with a made up name and chad pic

Yeah you were asking for it desu

>>37024435
Sure there is; facebook surfaces old photos and suggests that you might like them all the time.

A couple of months ago, a friend of mine liked a bunch of photos of me and a girl I was orbiting; the photos were from years ago, but they had just popped up in his timeline, and he thought we were dating.

>>37024521
They don't, but I still screens hot every time instead of downloading or even right click saving as. Never hurts to be cacious.

>>37024558
Enjoy showing real ID When the Facebook kikes ask for it.

File: 1493349824269.png (361KB, 858x725px) Image search: [Google]

361KB, 858x725px

>>37024521
WTF MAN IS THIS REAL?????? HOLY SHIT I'M SO FUUUUUUUUUUUUCKED

Facebook page marketing SEO scum here

>>37024392
No it won't. Not unless she saw it between you liking it and unlocking it. Facebook retracts notifications.

>>37024521
You're making this up.

>>37024310
>>37024251
Plausible ways to get out. But unliking is the best bet.

>>37024602
Only some accounts have it enabled; it's one of the things they're testing.

>>37024619
>Facebook retracts notifications.
Interesting, I made two separate fake accounts just to test this, and the notification on the other account was still active even when I unlike it with the other account. Even hours after.

>>37024198
>accidentally posted a screencap of my saved pic collection to normiebook

>>37024198
I love this pepe.

orig

>>37024673
>accidentally sent a love letter to my crush
Fucking autocorrect, haha :D

i did the same thing back then despite me being aware that she'll get notified. i thought the photo was cute so watevs right?

Later on , she liked one of my old photos.

What does that mean brobots?

>>37024673
>accidentally posted my cum tribute album to my normiebook

>>37024564
Why does zuckerberg do this? For what purpose other than misunderstandings?

>>37024715
ask her "what did you mean by this"

File: 1488487122202.jpg (16KB, 212x212px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 212x212px

>>37024310
yeah man at 3am for best results

>>37024198

Liking/unliking is one of the last things you have to worry about. If she has the "content creator" flag set, and she happens to look at her "user interaction/engagement report" she'll see a list of photos that people viewed for the most time, and which users viewed her photos for the most time.

>>37024743
actually, dont

>>37024739
wew lad post it here plx

>>37024747
>3 am
famalam, which timezone you at

>>37024715
I see this shit all the time on chads' FB. Chad deliberately goes back and likes some qt's two year old photos, not because he likes it or anything, but to let her know he is interested in her. Then girl usually proceeds to do the same. This is how 21st century relationships form on FB.

>>37024740
Increasing user engagement; getting old content active again, so they can sell more ads.

After all, the photos are already there. If they can get more users viewing them, and sell more ads, they can make more money off of assets they already have.

>>37024643
If an account has next to no activity it will stay there until it can replaced. Your typical Stacey though averages 2 notifications an hour. If you want a better way to test it, do a quick like/unlike on a trusted family member or friend's account and follow up their notifications in person when you see them. Eg.

>>37024761
Please someone tell me this anon is trolling.

>>37024798
This does not work on profiles. only "pages" for companies. Even then, it does not show WHO clicked on a pic. Just stats

>>37024765
mentally im still in highschool

>>37024864
famalam that's not what i asked

>>37024832

They're really focusing on adding tools for "content creators" to see metrics for their content.

I had a meme I made blow up and go viral, and suddenly I crossed some threshold for shares, and had a lot of new tools show up.

>>37024769
is that how it works now .. ? sounds lame.

File: 78664437.jpg (52KB, 443x332px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 443x332px

>>37024521
>>37024521
HAHAHAHAHAHAH im so fucking dead

>>37024919
Interesting...
Post meme in question pls

>>37024924
Might be lame, but it works for Chad.

>>37024521
DELETE THIS YOUR SCARING ME

File: what man.jpg (175KB, 790x592px) Image search: [Google]

175KB, 790x592px

>just got a citation for visiting my oneitis' facebook profile 3661 times in the last month

i'm due in court next Monday

>>37025115
That's 122 times a day, anon. What the hell are you doing