>2000 years ago some schitzophrenic desert man cut his baby's

isaac wasn't a baby when he circumcised him, he was 8 years old. and the stabby thing didn't happen until isaac was in his 30s

>>36845601
Is that image child porn?

>>36845705
of course not goy, it's a normal and beautiful practice! want to watch the rabbi suck the blood off?

>>36845733
>of course not goy, it's a normal and beautiful practice! want to watch the rabbi suck the blood off?

Are you sure this image isn't child porn? That's a baby and that's a penis.

According to the other thread, people like us should be brained with a bat on live TV because we saw it.

THAT is how angry people get about cp

>>36845892
Well its one of the first images that comes up on google images... so I guess they're a bunch of pedos to?

>>36845892
Haha, you're talking about me, I think. Although I didn't say live TV. I think people who view child porn should be Negan'd

"It's a baby with a penis" doesn't make it cp. Porn is porn, you know it when you see it.

That being said, circumcision is disgusting.

>>36845939
>Well its one of the first images that comes up on google images... so I guess they're a bunch of pedos to?

Oh yeah. In fact anyone who browses /r9k/ has likely seen child porn before.

>>36845964
You know it when you see it? Ah yes, the Jacobellis v. Ohio argument, isn't it?

And why is that a problem anon, would you mind clarifying? What role do you think the state has in controlling obscene content if there are absolutely no victims, say, in the case of Eliza's nudes?

File: circumcision.jpg (31KB, 600x400px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 600x400px

>>36845964
What about Rabbi's? Should they be killed to? They literally SUCK ON BABY DICKS ON A REGULAR BASIS.

>>36846072
MODS MODS MODS

Origioni Commentoli

>>36845697
Oh well I guess its all fine then. carry on :^)

>>36846038
Okay, let me put it in very specific terms.

If someone takes a photo or video with the explicit intent to sexualize children, yes this includes child pageants which are utterly disgusting, they should be arrested. If someone has video or photography that sexualized children or shows children engaging in sexual activity, they should be arrested.

Clear enough, faggot?

>>36846072
They shouldn't do it, no, it can cause STDs, but they're not going "I'm going to fellate a baby".

>>36845892
kill yourself you pedo faggot

>>36846152
>trying to reason with a pedo
Just stop. They're mentally ill and masters at mental gymnastics. That's why they never seem to be able to kill themselves despite nobody in society but their own approving of them

>>36846152
Oh, so you believe the current laws are not strict enough?

You believe that possession of EVEN CLOTHED pictures, if with the intent to sexualize children, should be against the law?

You believe that the guy who saved bikini pictures of his classmates off Facebook should be thrown in prison?

You believe that the mere possession of content which could be construed as sexual should be a criminal offense?

>>36846223
I'm not a pedo anon, and I am not the one doing mental gymnastics to justify my hatred for some group of people.

Read the argument and think critically about it, can you do that or is it impossible for you to consider such a thing from an unbiased perspective?

Imagine if the prohibition caused a similar reaction in the US. If people looked at alcoholics as violent rapists, CRIMINALS.

>>36846281
>society decides they don't want pedophiles
>society makes laws to punish people for being pedos
>society ostracizes pedos because it's an evolutionary trait to protect their young

I really don't know how it's so hard for you to understand. Society does not want you or your kind, the laws just didn't come out of no where.

>>36846281
You're really splitting hairs here. I'm not a lawmaker, but you know, there have to be laws about this shit.

I think the current laws we have are fine, dude.

"BUT IF A 19 YEAR OLD HAS PICTURES OF A 16 YEAR OLD!!!!!"

Yeah, well, sorry, there's gotta be a cutoff at some point.

>>36845892
Child Pornography is the depicition of minors engaged in sexual acts or exposing their areas suggestively. That's why things like Nirvana's album cover for "Nevermind", Blind Faith's album cover, and Scorpion's "Virgin Killer" are all freely available to see. This also extends to images of nudist resorts and families, used with the intent of promoting resorts and colonies, not for sexual arousal. If underage nudity were as illegal as child porn then every family with a picture of their kids in the tub would be committing felonies in excess of decades in prison.

The law is very clear on this.

The Old Testament is older then 2000 years.

>American education

jews are filthy vermin too, but I wouldn't really blame american's love of circumcision on them. jews have never been the only ones to practice circumcision, but it was resurrected by puritans to stop boys from masturbating, and america was the only christian country backwards enough for it to catch on.