Check this out:
>A quarter of straight porn searches by women are for videos featuring violence against their own sex. Five percent of searches by women are for content portraying nonconsensual sex. While men still search for significantly more porn than women, search rates for these more extreme types of sexual content are at least twice as common among women than men.
>Those statistics make for fairly surprising reading, but are the facts Dr Seth Stephens-Davidowitz, a former Google data scientist, discovered when he was given complete access to PornHub's search and views data for his upcoming book. "If there is a genre of porn in which violence is perpetrated against a woman, my analysis of the data shows that it almost always appeals disproportionately to women," he writes.
https://www.vice.com/en_nz/article/why-are-so-many-women-searching-for-ultra-violent-porn
What do you have to say for yourself fembots? Why do you like watching BBC gangbangs?
Because it gets me off. Deal with it.
>>36816478
>Because it gets me off. Deal with it.
I can deal with it. Link the stuff you've gotten off to recently.
>>36816396
>Women like to be abused by Chad Thundercock
No shit Einstein, virtually every woman is sexually submissive. Which makes feminism and strong womyn shit pretty funny, too, because they can't let go of their inner obedient girl.
Also
>citing vice as a source
>>36816396
>>36816478
nothing wrong with that
what is wrong however is when women pretend it isn't so and they're all peaches and flowers inside to the point of pornhub, the very site where this data is coming from, having had a 'female friendly' category for years (though it's not clearly whether that means it should appeal more to females or whether the females in the porn in question are being treated friendly, but most likely the former)
the goal is to have beta males fear any slip-up in their presence lest the lady be offended by a untoward word so they get the beta bux when they're older while living out their real fantasies before that
>>36816548
Is that really what Bill Nye the Shabbos Goy is up to these days?
Some engineers are ridiculous. They think they can speak with authority about any subject.
>>36816554
>the goal is to have beta males fear any slip-up in their presence lest the lady be offended by a untoward word so they get the beta bux when they're older while living out their real fantasies before that
The problem with modern society is that boys are raised with expectations about women that are demonstrably untrue. That women and men are exactly the same and that correspondingly what a woman wants in a partner is basically a "life partner" or some shit.
Women want assertive, strong men. There's nothing wrong with that, but raising generations of kids with ideas about women that simply aren't true isn't fair on them.
>>36816562
His new show is a constant barrage of degeneracy.
I'm an engineer and I understand your sentiment. Most engineers I know realizee they are not scientists just because they took some basic science courses in university, but you always meet some
>muh engineering is so difficult, you need to know math, physics, chemistry n shiet all at the same time xDDDDD
people. They are usually the dumber ones.
>>36816621
Yeah don't get me wrong, I have the utmost respect for engineers but like you say, you run across some who think they can discuss even more arcane stuff like linguistics with complete authority.
Nye was always a faggot I guess. I find it weird how they sort of reintroduced him after his long hiatus from the media some years ago. The guy is the personification of Reddit though so it makes sense.
Why single out us fembots? You guys like it too.
We admit we're sluts at least.
>>36816910
You browse porn much more than we as men do.
>>36816396
>A quarter of straight porn searches by women are for videos featuring violence against their own sex
I just want to love a girl.
I don't want to have to hurt her.
I'd do it if it made her happy, but I'd rather just be gentle with her.