Why are u confused trap luvr?

Genuinely interested in this.

sexuality is not a binary concept
that presumption is an arbitrary and limiting abstraction
there is no such thing as heterosexual
there is no such thing as homosexual

there might be sexual range personally expanded around things you will copulate with

>>36777851
No I'm pretty sure you're gay actually.

Take any other sort of aspect of human behavior and you couldn't bullshit about muh non-binary rainbow

>so I went to a Mosque to pray today
>oh so you're Muslim? I thought you were atheist? Did you convert recently?
>WOW YOU BACKWARDS BIGOT DON'T ASSUME THAT I'M MUSLIM JUST BECAUSE I PRAY IN A MOSQUE

>so I ate some lamb the other day
>oh so you're omnivore? I thought you were vegan? Did you change your diet recently?
>WOW YOU BACKWARDS BIGOT DON'T ASSUME THAT I'M OMNIVORE JUST BECAUSE I EAT MEAT


>So I voted for Trump in the election
>etc etc

you get the idea, hopefully. you silly closet homo

>>36777952
you've not argued well in the slightest, fagtron

I get if you're into a trap, but if you find out he has a dick and are still into it u bi or gay. It ain't no thang, but you definitely bi/gay.

>>36778010
let me simplify it for you then.

If you actively seek pictures of penises = you gay.

>>36777851
There are two sexes; the "intersex" that you hear about occurs in approximately 1 in every 400 births (.25 percent) and it can be reasonably argued that it is merely a birth defect. Anyhow since there are only two sexes, homosexuality and heterosexuality do exist since there is not a spectrum of sexes to be attracted to. On top of this trannies are mentally ill (I don't mean to purposely apply a negative connotation to the term "mentally ill", it is simply what they are) but just because they may change their physical characteristics to appear as the opposite sex, doesn't mean that they aren't still their birth sex. That being said, it can be argued that heterosexual men can still like traps because they are attracted to the femininity of the trap, not the fact that they are male. Of course, arguments can be made against this as well. All in all, it doesn't matter much to me who someone wants to fuck

>>36778263
>That being said, it can be argued that heterosexual men can still like traps because they are attracted to the femininity of the trap, not the fact that they are male.

Cognitive dissonance.

There's a gorillion pictures and video of naked women who are woman and, consequently, don't have a sausage & potatoes between their legs.

The lads who actively look for "traps" only want to look at dicks.

File: 9F9A058D-B91E-4E9D-A62D-1103EFCF636D-853-000003CB5ABEB32A.jpg (44KB, 500x461px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 500x461px

>>36778263
>dick
>feminine features

Don't get the possibility of an argument here.