There's postcolonial studies, women's studies, queer studies but there doesn't seem to be any study you can take that resolves around bitter virgin losers.
>>36724853
You guys are massive pussies. There's people who interact with the most dangerous parts of life but you guys are literally afraid of even the most basic shit. 1st graders have more balls than you.
that's a surprisingly good point. then again going off how reclusive the average forever alone is and how embarrassed they are by being total losers it would be hard to have a big study.
>>36724901
No shit why are you here again? You think robots don't how pathetic they are? Do you get off on telling losers how much of a loser they are?
>>36724901
>You guys are massive pussies.
Any source for this claim?
>>36724956
Hey he asked
>>36725451
But he didn't even use any theoretical models to come to such a conclusion. This is why we need "loser studies". Loser studies would incorperate several theoretical frameworks to ask such questions as "how pervasive is lookism", "how much does genetics play a role in loserdom" and so on and so on.
Robots are marginalized human beings who have been ignored for far to long by academia.
>>36725625
>>36725451
Of course it would also critically examine the archetype of Chad and Stacy and so on and so on.