MBTI hate thread

>>36656417
>Why are normies and redditors so into fitting themselves into pre-defined boxes ? Why do they need a survey to tell them what there personality is ?

The people who obsess about that shit need to be banned
It's gotten so ridiculous, it's become a little sub community of morons who circle jerk about their retard labels

>>36656417
it's not a survey, it's a test

File: 1435200579361.jpg (37KB, 540x656px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 540x656px

>>36656417

why does OP use the term "normies" to put others into predefined boxes like a fag?

>>36656417
let me just stuff you into the contrarian NEET nerd-virgin box.

Look up Jung's thinking functions.

Because despite how most people in here thrive to be as different and original from the norm, we all fit into one or more category. Individualism is mostly just illusion. You're not that unique. We're all normies, in a way. Only when you accept that fact can you move on and forge your own future.

>>36656417
>What I mean by reified consciousness, I can illustrate-without elaborate philosophical contemplation-most simply with an American experience. Among the frequently changing colleagues which the Princeton Project provided me with, was a young lady. After a few days, she had gained confidence in me, and asked most kindly: "Dr Adorno, would you mind a personal question?". I said, "It depends on the question, but just go ahead", and she went on: "Please tell me: are you an extrovert or an introvert?". It was as if she, as a living being, already thought according to the model of multi-choice questions in questionnaires.
>t. Theodor Adorno

really tickles those brainy organelles

>>36656570
>Theodor Adorno
what an autist.

File: 1490417410039.png (599KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

599KB, 1920x1080px

>>36656417
>tfw every time I take the MBTI test I get something different because none of my values are ever greater than 58%
>tfw too intelligent for the MBTI meme

>>36656525
>>36656506
>>36656482
>he actually fell for the MBTI meme
>he thinks it's fine for a dichotomous test to have modal distribution
>myfuckingsides.png

>>36656417
It's a tool that helps people relate to each other.
>I'm in this box
>I am too!
> I dislike this box!
> Hey, fuck you buddy, I AM this box!
> I share traits with people in this box
> Hey, I have that trait too!

It's harmless. No test could possibly capture the entirety of human variance.