>tfw there are pets being treated and fed better than me Are

File: Once again.jpg (23KB, 600x318px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 600x318px

>>36305587
The following statement is not a work of fiction

>>36305587
>Are pet humans a thing?
That's basically what adult NEETs who are still fully supported by their parents are. I feel that way at least.

Why is it generally considered bad for a human adult to be dependent on their parents when millions of people pay for pets that do nothing other than provide their presence? I think a good percentage of pet owners spend more money on their pets than my parents do on me.

>>36305587
Not a real thing, but the Pet Shop Boys were quite a good band.

>>36305587
People only keep pets because they're cute, or they perform a job, or they bring some sort of joy in their life. The only people who would keep a pet NEET are the same people who keep lizards and spiders and other pets which you can't even see half of the time.

>>36305587
That's because they provide more worth to their owners than you do to anybody whomsoever in this world.