Archived threads in /r9k/ - ROBOT9001 - 885. page

File: 1503433796940.png (122KB, 500x517px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 500x517px

>fucked a girl with a boyfriend
If i count yes (^:
>fucked a girl someone else was in love with
maybe, i've had 2 girlfriends (met both on 4chan) they had some orbiters here and there, but no idea if any of them were actually in love with her

File: 1501974742200.png (466KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

466KB, 600x600px

>tfw I've literally not done a SINGLE one of these things

Well boys, time to end it.

>>39240679
You're not supposed to. It's Chado. If there is anything on the list that you've done then your next move should be getting the fuck out of /r9k/.

Join some mmo, you will find a girlfriend quite fast, problem is, it will be one with a penis

Just keep being a failed normie and post your picture every opportunity you get.

You don't or you try online dating in places like reddit.

>>39240435
yes of course

i dont really as much anymore since no one does anything nice for me, it's not about getting things done but its like no one else is nice

yes, everyone has or they're retarded

if you understand the concept of kindness you should exercise it

>>39240435
does allowing oneself to be used by a person count as doing something nice

One of the most common arguments that I've seen advanced and wish to preempt is that 4chan doesn't 'decline' as much as it 'evolves'. That 4chan in effect goes through distinct and identifiable periods that can be distinguished from each other, but that none of them represent a change in quality so much as they amount to a simple costume change. I fail to see this as anything other than an attempt to deny the concept of 'quality' altogether. It's an opinion that doesn't reflect an examination of what those changes actually meant, but simply claims that 'for my own concern, they are interchangeable' which speaks more or less to an agreeable and uncritical attitude in the individual than a serious attempt examine the issue. I hope that my arguments will put this notion to rest or at least encourage someone to rethink that idea.

I want to firstly try to engage the notion that quality on 4chan does not change: that it is 'zero-sum'. That as one board declines its creative energy is spread totally undiminished to other boards and the quality of 4chan doesn't change even as boards get worse. I do not think this is the case. I believe that more realistically the creative energy of a board is a unique configuration of particular posters to particular board. Someone who generates amusing OC on /sp/, for example, cannot simply be transplanted to another board and produce the same level of content. For one he might not even want to. His impetus might be entirely limited to that one board and he might not have anything to say on a different board. There are structural conditions unique to boards as well which dictate what posters can actually post. Boards with strict moderation are generally going to have less free-wheeling OC than more relaxed boards. Turning a lightly-modded board into a highly-modded board (like /sp/'s experience) diminishes the overall creative capacity of 4chan itself. It doesn't simply just shift it from one board to another (Cont 2/11)

Secondly the addition of new boards disperses the efforts of posters, even if quality was zero-sum across the whole of 4chan, it can't all go to the same board. The addition of new boards means that 'quality' is dissipated by being spread thin across a host of hitherto nonexistent boards, which has the effect of diminishing quality on individual boards (some of these new boards have unique interactions with the quality of others when their subject matter overlap /qst/ for example had a substantial impact on /tg/, arguably /lit/, /adv/ and /sci/ on r9k).

The idea that quality on 4chan is zero-sum becomes even more ridiculous when you elaborate what it actually means. That 4chan in 2003 is the same as 4chan in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008...2017. That in the entire evolution of 4chan from a niche community of SA weebs to its vertiginous rise to 'last boss of the internet' and onto today with the changes that entailed, 4chan was qualitatively unchanged. I propose that quality on 4chan instead resembles an organic life-cycle with fertile periods of intense activity brought about by unique conditions which attract new users, eventually reach maturity, and then exhaust themselves and become pale imitations of those high times (paradoxically, more users and more activity do not equal greater creativity which is the lifeblood of quality, since only a tiny minority of posters are actually responsible for content https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1%25_rule_(Internet_culture) , more users can actually have the opposite effect and drown or drive out the content creators under heaps of worthless shitposts). Quality then is not simply users posting but it is the right kind of user in the right environment. (Cont 3/11)

All posters are not created equal. It's common sense but its an idea that's worth exploring. Not all posters are able or willing to make the same contributions in their posts. Not only does intelligence and articulation vary wildly, but so does their effort and experience. Broadly speaking a 15 year old highschooler on his first week posting from his phone between checking his twitter and browsing reddit is not going to provide the same level of maturity and thoughtfulness as a 25 year old whose been here for 10 years (ironically in this regard, a NEET might be a better poster than a high-functioning adult because of the level of commitment they can invest in their posting). 4chan is the sum of its users and what they see fit to post so it stands to reason that changes in its users or their attitudes towards posting have a substantial impact on the general quality of the site.

So what makes a 'good' 4chan poster? This is something that can vary greatly depending on opinion, but there are a number of things that I think we can generally agree on make for better posters: intelligence, wit, creativity (e.g. creating OC rather than being a passive spectator), commitment (someone who invests more time and effort in their posts is preferable to someone who spends as little time as possible), familiarity & respect for the respective culture (nobody wants posters who treat their boards no different than they would 9gag). Too little of these respective qualities wreck havoc on a board and if we examine the change in 4chan activity over the last years we see signs that indicate legions of new users who exhibit a staggering lack of these qualities. (Cont 4/11)

Visiting >>>/r9k/ for the first time

My sister hanging herself from her closet with her scarf.

>>39240322
when my prosecutor asked me about photos in my 4chan folder

File: 3c2.png (2MB, 1064x983px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1064x983px

this is a nice egelord comment, you even started bitching about a non existent god as if you would upset something.

faggots who are uncomfortable in their own skin are pathetic

>>39240191
You've just described most animals. What's your point?

>>39240245
How are you not? Why does all of these disgusting things that could be non-existent in another life appeal to you?

I want to be an emo kid more than I want to dj

>>39240058
Nowadays they dont do much. They just play mp3 files with a few fade outs here and there.

Early 2000's were the height of the hobby. When DJ's spun DnB and Jungle instead of this dubstep garbage.

>load playlist
>switch between songs
>sometimes do something funky
>bang your head slightly with your left hand touching your headphones

>>39239918
i just wanna be gangbanged anonymously by cute guys that are std free basically

it would be even better if they were all people i know online

>>39240038
nice,gangbangs are difficult to arrange

>>39240062
yeah i know it will never happen

i also want to have a fanbase like a lot of those online traps

>>39239842
That's a nice hentai

>>39239842
Feminism has instilled the belief in them that they're more valuable and important than men thus turning them into spoiled, arrogant brats

Men don't make them earn their money or diamonds.

Lmao I'm a girl don't hit on me

>>39239638
I feel nothing because I'm circumcised. Is that the answer you wanted?

As some one with phimosis, it's so sensitive it's painful to touch.

>>39239578
>Why do women like being degraded?
submission is in their dna. what kind of question is this?

Idk anon, it just feels good to be a sub for the majority of women, just like I imagine it feels good for thr majority of men to be a dom. What is wrong with that?

my ex girlfriend loved it when I called her "my little fuck toy" and reminded her that she was just a bunch of holes or me to fill. She loved getting spanked and for me to fuck her into submission until she couldn't move

A world without shitskins is my dream
Or at the very least, a society that they can't enter and ruin

Read The Years of Rice and Salt. The Black Death kills all Europeans and Muslims and Chinese take over the world. All in all, things aren't tgat different. Native Americans are still fucked and the old wolrd powers have a single world war, except it lasts 30 fucking years.

File: 974dcf0f16573fece63208101429ab73.jpg (281KB, 1440x900px) Image search: [Google]

281KB, 1440x900px

>jews

orgiaofnsdaaalkn

No. And women are delusional to believe such.

I rather jerk my weewee off.

File: IMG_1584.jpg (44KB, 640x704px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 640x704px

Lmao I can just beat my own dick with no compromise

yeah every day is the same shit but what should i do about it? kill myself? what if that what is coming after life is even worse?
So i just don't think about it and go to my shitty job to do shitty tasks for 8 hours come back home distract myself with shitposting and it repeats everyday

>>39239703
i really hope there isn't an afterlife, i want this to be it.

This line of thought never occurs to most people. They just go through the motions like mindless automatons and next thing you know they're 6 feet under.

In fact, some people actually lack a sense of temporal awareness, and only have a vague idea of when tomorrow will come.

Neuroticism is a curse.

I imagine you do not understand life, are unironically a basement dwelling social reject, and are depressed because you are an aimless wastrel.

Look around, there is a lot of variation in business and lifestyle. Find something to do and try to do it.
>inb4 I'm not like all the other girls

>>39238836
What a presumptive faggot. I have zero interest in your primitive culture or your 32 flavors of slavery. Get rekt. I'm starting to think more all the time that my only real option is to buy whatever land I can afford and build the cheapest house I can and become self-sufficient. Your society needs to die. Fuck the rich. Kill the rich.

>>39238862
I thought you had no money?
haha, good luck becoming self sufficient, you can't even find purpose or gainful employment.
Get rekt...? Good luck on your journey to self sufficiency. You can't take part in division of labor so I'm sure you'll manage to do everything you need all by yourself just fine, that's usually how ineptitude works.