Can anyone remove these
can i get sauce of the girl in the pic? it's from a youtube thumbnail but i couldn't find a sauce on the video.
Billie something.
The thumbnail was from amazing atheist I think, it was definitely some cringelord.
Basically if you type big boobs in google images her pic pops up.
Hello, /r/. Can you please tell me who is she?
NVM, got it - Virgo Peridot
Found this one on a funny hentai quotes tread and sadly the original material has been eluding me.
add yandex in ur list of search engine
found it thru yandex
https://nhentai.net/g/179124/17/
Xray and nudeshop and faceswap these hos
gonna do a few shops before bed :)
only doing boobs sry.
I've been looking for a while now, and for some reason, ebony incest porn seems almost nonexistent. I realize it's kinda niche, but, well, this is the internet. Anyone got any good links they could hook me up with? Shit with some kind of "story" is best.
source on this please guys
+1
>>15532447
One of my all time fav gifs... I would suck that bitches dick raw.
>>15532450
do you please for love of god have source my dick is so hard
Post a pic and I will do it.
If you have some private stuff to be done, send me a mail: [email protected]
yesterday, someone asked to do her pic
>>15532444
so here it is
Make her chubbier
Does anyone have that one grotesque drawing of trump with a large dick? Think I saw it on /b/ sometime and I can't find it by googling.
It isn't pic related.
>>15532420
bump
>>15532420
The one where its draped over his leg?.. i know which one you're talking about but I cannot find it for the life of me.
>>15532843
I believe so actually. I remember it was on some obscure website. The link was either posted on /b/ or the photo was and I reverse searched it to find it. This was probably 6 months ago.
Please guys
>>15532100
bubump
Xray pls? Thanks
B u m p qq
Does anyone know the name ? Thanks
>>15531841
bump
anyone ?
lolita nabokov
She used to sell this on Manyvids. I can't find it anywhere on the internet. It's one of her first B/G videos. Does anyone here have it?
Bus
Good morning. Ready to play "Strip a Bitch" for the next two hours.
Rules -- Post your picts; I will try to xray them in the order posted. For the most part, I will post my results, regardless of how good they are. If I don't get a result. I will explain what I think my problem was and whether I think someone else might get a better result.
No underaged subjects. I will skip any obvious underaged subjects. Please post age. If no face, I will skip. Faceless pictures are boring and may be underaged. I also don't do asses. If I have done the shot before (or if I recognize it as posted too often), I will probably skip. I also don’t like cropped picts, or close-ups that are effectively crops, and may skip.
Tell me who she is to you. I may skip if you don't. I will put in extra effort in some cases if you do.
I use multiple methods. I start with colour and contrast filters, rather than the normal level method. If that doesn't work, I will try curves (rather than levels) with colour shift to match skintone for light or white clothes and sharpening/blending. I sometimes use an exposure/colour shift method for black or dark clothes. I use unsharpen mask and highpass filtering rather than burn to bring out detail, although I do use a light burn/dodge to bring out nipple colour as a finishing touch. I also use blurs, both at the start, to even out noise, and at the end as a finisher.
If my ordinary method does not work, I will use other, more advanced methods before giving up, including work with inverts and channels.
My method works better with dark clothes (especially black) then it does with white clothes. Also, there are a lot of rayers who do white, and do white exclusively and very well. For that reason, I may skip white clothes just because my time is limited here.
Some rules. Shadows and light gradients are a problem. Dark clothes require brighter light (otherwise no data); and light clothes require more dim light (otherwise they are washed out). Layers and glossy fabric are serious problems. The key here is that light penetrates through clothes, to skin, and then gets reflected back. To get at this colour data, first the light has to penetrate (layers and glossiness interfere with that -- and swimsuits are often both layered and glossy).
The picture is manipulated to remove colour levels associated with clothes, leaving a very faint and often low quality image of bare skin, which can then be enriched through filters that duplicate and fill in pixel patterns. This is why patterned fabric, stripes, shadows, and colour gradients are a problem. In such cases, you can't just remove some colour levels to reach a few that show skin and not much else.
If you could do her, that'd be great. Thanks.