>corporate taxes are gutted >reason is explicitly for job

>>53686717
>>literally no difference in job growth

Are you talking about something in particular, or are you just assuming this is how it would play out?

>>53686954
I'm talking about what's actually happening.

>>53686717
maybe in a shitty country like canada yeah

>>53686996
What country, when did the corporate tax cuts occur, and how are you measuring job growth?

>>53686717
>goyim don't understand economics

Color me surprised.

Don't worry, Anon, those jobs will trickle down eventually.

>>53687050
My country. Our federal corporate tax rate was cut several times in the years during and after the 2008 financial crisis. However, our full-time employment rate has not recovered to pre-recession levels, and actually started trending downward again a few years ago.

>>53687651
That's fucked tbh fam.

>>53687651
Low corporate taxes will only add jobs if they expand in your country. What does outsourcing look like?

>>53687708
I appreciate your honesty, fam.

>>53688171
It depends on the industry. Manufacturing hasn't really done well, although we have stronger exports with a weak dollar, that isn't stopping those jobs from going overseas.

>>53687651
perhaps this is because you peg minimum wage to inflation. you cut corporate tax rate on one hand and continually up wages on the other so nothing ever moves forward

>>53688684
This tbh. Cutting taxes aint gonna do shit if you fags have all sorts of other shitty regulations

Let me explain something, OP. When a business finds itself with extra money it does not use it to hire people that it doesn't need. A business hires people because it will make the business more money, not the other way around.

The only way this mo'money thing works is if the business uses it to expand. But again, they do that if it will make them more money, not because they have more money.