Is there anything more blue pill than the big bang theory? It seems like a clear case of brainwashing.
The big bang/atheism is the theory that in the beginning there was nothing, and then nothing magically condensed and exploded, and then all of a sudden the universe as we know it popped into existence. Nothing exploded in order to create everything.
It seems so blatantly obviously false, how can NOTHING exploded to become SOMETHING? It defies all common logic. This is what identifies it as a jewish psy op. It's a theory that is completely implausible and your own common sense and mathematics that you should know since a baby tells you that nothing cannot suddenly become something, yet it is widely accepted anyway.
It's an experiment to see how many people they can brainwash into believing something blatantly false without question just because scientists told them so. The Bible explains exactly how the universe was created by Almighty God yet most people shy away from it and give into the jewish brainwashing and believe something clearly false. By indoctrinating people into this big bang lie, they are able to more easily push them towards being good submissive goyim and doing anything an authority figure tells them without question; this led to the rise of cultural marxism etc.
>>44210398
It doesn't say nothing came from nothing. It says all matter as we know it was infinitely compressed in a single point and then it expanded. What we don't know is how it got there.
>I don't understand physics
>Therefore the big bang didn't happen
yep.
>>44210398
>Is there anything more blue pill than the big bang theory?
>You would have been burned alive 500 years ago for speaking about it
How is that a blue pill?
>>44210466
Who are you quoting?
>>44210505
>Would have been burned alive 500 years ago for being a tranny
>Therefore being a tranny is red pill now
Didn't take long for the jews to arrive in this thread. Begone demons.
>>44210398
Also, you clearly don't understand physics. It never says anything about something from nothing.
The point is that science will correct itself if/ when something better comes along... unlike some people.
>fedora tipping autists will defend the Big Bang if it means denouncing religion
>unknowingly, they make themselves look as retarded as the people they disagree with
>>44210554
I don't think you know what the pills mean
>>44210398
come on man you gotta work on improving the quality of your bait, here have a rare pepe from my collection as a concilation prize
>>44210554
Where have you seen that the big bang occurred from nothing?
Do you have a PHD in astrophysics OP?
SLIPPERY FORUM
JIDF DETECTED
DO NOT REPLY
big bang theory was created by the church itself
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Big_Bang_theory
>>44210635
Where did the matter come from originally? Did the original matter before the big bang explode itself into existence magically as well?
>this is what atheists literally believe
>>44210398
We have evidence, you have an ancient jew book. You christians are retards.
>>44210702
What cosmology theory do you prefer?
>>44210746
Almighty God created the universe and everything in it. This is explained clear as can be in Genesis.
Does the Big Bang require as much faith as God?
>>44210398
That "nothing" becoming everything is nothing because scientists have already explained that they don't know what was before the Big Bang, so the theory of the Big Bang is just that, a theory, because its not complete
>>44210775
No, atheism requires infinitely more faith considering it offers no answers and the guarantee of damnation.
>>44210770
4/10
>>44210398
>The big bang/atheism
Look at this degenerate atheist scientist who came up with the modern theory of the Big Bang and cosmological expansion of space.
>>44210398
0/10
>>44210702
Dude.....you're talking about abiogenesis, not the big bang. Are you 10?
>>44210554
>the jews
kek
>>44210891
I don't think you know what abiogenesis is.
>>44210927
Jesus wasn't a jew.
>>44210398
> Xstianity == redpill
Every time I think that /pol/ has found the bottom of the Well of Stupid, somebody posts again.
>>44210970
good point!
>>44210992
OP is trolling.
confirmed here. >>44210970
>>44210970
>king of the jews
>messiah of jewish religion
>not a jew
Top kek
I actually have researched into it, the big bang is not without explanation, I suggest you read into it, it is very interesting. For starters, nothingness is inherently unstable, and from the quantum foam and virtual particles which pop into and out of existence in a perfect vacuum with cosmic expansion applied to it, it created the big bang, from the inflation that occurs everyday in the universe, our big bang has likely caused other big bangs to create other universes with completely different laws which define their physical realm. It is an endless cycle of universes, and it would be very interesting in the future to get more insight as to why quantum mechanics works this way and why nothing is unstable. By the way, if it is unreasonable to believe nothing created something, then how could god create anything. Also, the god would have to have been created if it were true, god being eternal is not any more of an explanation than the big bang, yet there is more evidence for the big bang.
>>44210398
well the theory came from the mind of a CATHOLIC, so there's that.....
>>44211112
Wow you sure showed me!
>>44210451
If something is infinitely 'small' then it is also infinitely 'big'.
>>44210398
>It seems so blatantly obviously false, how can NOTHING exploded to become SOMETHING?
Funnily enough, observations of the Observable Universe suggest that the net energy density of the Universe is actually zero. All the positive energy densities from matter, radiation, etc appear to balance the negative energy density associated with dark energy or some form of cosmological constant driving the metric expansion of space.
The Universe isn't "something" that came from "nothing", it's more like "nothing" that changed into a different configuration of "nothing".
that show is a piece of shit
>>44211160
Worse, a Catholic Priest that was trying to unify Christianity and Science. His observation of galaxies moving farther apart gave rise to his "big bang theory", or how he invisioned that God created the universe. Of course we now know that while some galaxies are moving farther apart other are moving closer together. In fact our own galaxy is not the Milkyway, but another that has collided with it. The only true scientific answer is that there is no indication that the universe ever had a beginning or if it will ever have an end.
>>44213959
All this shows is that Catholics are even moreso not Christians. They don't even believe the words in the Bible. What a shame.
>>44210466
Explain the universe expanding faster than the speed of light.
>>44210398
I dont like it when scientist formulate a theory trying to put their name into science just for the sake of it, it makes it hard for our beliefs to evolve and adapt our mindset when new information is given.
We might have a good idea but there a many things in physics we still have not understood to get a good picture of how everything came into being the way it is. I'm glad that we have come into an age where more people are finding science something 'cool' and a field to pioneer in and can't wait to see what perspectives could be offered from a generation of fresh minds and humble science.
I do believe that there was a Creator but it is a faith based belief I will admit and am not ashamed, I think no one cares about community or family any more but meeting my ancestors and family one day that I didn't get to meet in this life is something I hope will happen when I die.
And to the people that say 'oh we only have this 1 life so you have to make the best out of it and immortalise yourself on earth' it is true but I say tell that to a starving baby in Africa.
>>44210398
>It seems so blatantly obviously false, how can NOTHING exploded to become SOMETHING? It defies all common logic.
Horseless buggies? Obviously false
Electricity? Obviously false
Speaking across great distances instantly with electricity? Obvisously false
Shitposting on korean kawaii image boards wirelessly? Obviously false
I'm not saying the big bang doesn't sound ridiculous, but looking at it from how you as a human understand things has go to be some sort of fallacy
>>44210970
That infographic is retarded as fuck. "Khazar" Jews are equally as vile as Jews from Isfahan and Sephardic jews. If they call themselves Jewish, they're typically the same parasitic fucks.
But go on. Worship your saturnian jew god.
>>44213959
>Of course we now know that while some galaxies are moving farther apart other are moving closer together. In fact our own galaxy is not the Milkyway, but another that has collided with it. The only true scientific answer is that there is no indication that the universe ever had a beginning or if it will ever have an end.
You're mistaking one galaxy eventually colliding with another as implying that Red Shift isn't occurring.
And, no, that isn't the only "true" scientific answer. There is more evidence of a singularity than the universe not having a beginning.
Then again, this is /pol/; so, jokes on me.
>>44214514
The christian God doesnt exist.
>>44214788
That's some great proof you have there
>>44214959
Touche you fucking retard.
>>44214788
Well I like to see it as a probability and if you take the 1 question does this God being exist or not you have a 50/50 chance so it would be unwise have a set mindset.
I like to think God has conveyed his message to all of mankind in different ways and languages but we have lost the original messages given to all our forefathers and have made our own Religions and nothing is spiritual anymore.
Leave all that aside and I find the words of Jesus to be challenging and very poetic
>>44214959
>That's some great proof you have there
I can prove to you that yhvh isn't god.
It totally fucking impossible, because "god" wouldn't need animal sacrifices and constant ball-licking from his worshippers.
>>44210398
Physicist here, been on 4chan for the past 7 years, definitely long enough to know that you're 100% percent serious, and I came to inform you that you're 100% right. We came up with it back in the day in order to test new propaganda methods. The science behind it is fairly sound, but we made up all of the starting axioms.
Sorry
sincerely,
Physicists
>>44215066
>Leave all that aside and I find the words of Jesus to be challenging and very poetic
Then you're a fucking retard. Jesus never left any worthwhile philosophy that stands on it's own and was just a wondering kike jewing people all over Israel.
>>44214788
yes he is he talks to me!
>>44215066
No you moron I SAID THE CHRISTIAN GOD doesnt exist.
It is possible for some extrauniversal alien lifeform to be the creator of our universe, but to claim its a benevolent deity that wants you to be altruistic to everyone is downright retarded.
>>44215246
yes he does.
I have conversations with him.
>>44210398
They think it may be eternal
>http://phys.org/news/2015-02-big-quantum-equation-universe.html
>>44215183
>Physicist here
>and I came to inform you that you're 100% right
Actual Astro physicist here with a 2/1 from Bristol University, and you are chatting through your dirt eye.
>>44215262
>A human can talk to an incomprehensible extrauniversal entity
Its amazing how mentally retarded you christians are.
>>44215246
show proof
>>44210398
Holy shit you're stupid. It doesn't explain where the mass comes from; it only tells us that the condensed mass expanded. Doesn't say where the math came from.
Do you really think that God created the Earth in 7 Earth days when the Earth and the sun didn't even exist, you fucking downie?
>>44215310
Very nice.
Actual nuclear physicist here with a PhD in hyper-polarization of noble gases through hybrid spin exchange optical pumping.
No one cares about your grades. no. one. bachelors degree... fucking worthless.
God is real, I talk to him, he tells me jews are going to hell because they lied about the holocaust, and also the big bang is a sham.
>>44215310
What do you think about this>>44215302
>>44215430
By math, I meant mass*.
>>44210398
>The big bang theory is Jewish lies and manipulation.
>The Bible is not
>>44215356
I'm not a christian, I just talk to god.
>>44215470
So you are a mental case
>tfw Christian
>tfw believe in the big bang
>>44215485
You are approximately half my age.
>>44215524
You are immature as you use fairy tales to cope with the harshness of reality.
>>44215443
Actual Senior Space Astronomer and Astro Nuclear Physicist here and I can confirm this.
>>44215451
>>44215451
>Quantum equation predicts
The big bang happened, like it or not.
Also that link makes no scientific claim, its just theory.
>>44215509
It's plausible for Christianity to be true and the Big Bang to have happened. Just, God caused the Big Bang.
How can people that genuinely believe in the scientific method accept the Big Bang THEORY as fact, when it is infact a THEORY, that might never be proven. Do they not realise that while they make the assumption of the Big Bang Theory as truth they are using faith.
Big Bang Theory does not equal science.
Big Bang Theory = demoralised nihilistic culturally marxist new age religion
>>44215443
Haha, PhD my arse.
>>44210578
A Creator could have caused the Big Bang you know. I'm not saying either is real, just stating facts.
>>44215672
No it didn't and you're an idiot to believe what you're told instead of being able to think for yourself.
>>44215217
I guess you could see it like that if you have no concept of time and what his words did to Rome, I don't though. But I'm trying to go through all the gospels not just the ones in the cannon given by Constantine
>>44215246
Well as I said it's a faith based relationship, if it's not true I wouldn't care.
And if you cannot see the benefit in having an altruistic virtue then that's your prerogative.
>>44215724
Fucking hell kid, go back to school then we'll talk.
>>44215693
Precisely. Check out Trey Smith. He's on JewTube. He does extremely logical videos in correlation with the Bible. I love them.
>>44210398
No, the Big Bang was a sudden expansion. Time never began.
>>44215730
>faith based relationship, if it's not true I wouldn't care
So you admit you are a retard trying to cope with the harshness of reality
>>44214433
>>44214433
2/10 fucking anglican
>>44215825
Why is it that the countries with the shittiest flags are the worst shitposters.
Bahamas, australians, greeks, jews, arabs
>>44215870
>YOU ARE A SHITPOSTER BECAUSE I DONT LIKE YOUR OPINION
At least in my country our women dont have us by the balls.
>>44210398
The big bang theory was proposed by a Catholic priest.
The steady state theory, which is coming back into chic, is the theory of an eternal (sounds pretty theistic to me) universe which has always been and always will be, which was mostly backed by Secular humanists when the Big Bang theory came out, fearing religious and papal influence in science.
60 years later and the connotations have switched. Go figure.
>>44215672
I have no care as to whether it happened or not. I was just asking about that theory.
Isn't the Big Bang just a theory too?
>>44215730
>time and what his words did to Rome
The kike said nothing new or revolutionary. He was a mad essene-cult rabbi preaching to illiterate goat herders and got executed.
The fact that the jews pushed his hybrid jew-cult religion into the mainstream doesn't mean his teachings actually have any value, which they don't. All this assumes he even existed.
>>44210560
>Science can't explain it, but I'm certain god doesn't exist
>>44210398
Google "Why does the universe exist"
>>44210398
>science is blue pill
>pls rape my face
A reminder for all the Godless atheists on this forum
A man can no more diminish God’s glory by refusing to worship Him than a lunatic can put out the sun by scribbling the word darkness on the walls of his cell.
-C S Lewis
>>44210560
You are a joke. You understand nothing, and neither do your scientists.
Astronomers have discovered a curious empty section of space which is missing around 10,000 galaxies.
The ‘supervoid’, which is 1.8 billion light-years across, is the largest known structure ever discovered in the universe but scientists are baffled about what it is and why it is so barren.
It sits in a region of space which is much colder than other parts of the universe and although it is not a vacuum, it seems to have around 20 per cent less matter than other regions.
Although the Big Bang theory allows for areas that are cooler and hotter, the size of the void does not fit with predicted models. Simply put, it is too big to exist.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/space/11550868/Giant-mysterious-empty-hole-found-in-universe.html
>>44210398
While theists think that an omniscient, complex, and omnipotent being popped into existence. Kek
Where did God come from?
>>44210398
Hey there faggot. I see your are conflating atheism with science! Nice try retard, but you're wrong.
Atheism= lack of belief in god/gods
Big Bang= best scientific theory about the start of our universe
They have literally NOTHING to do with each other. The rest of your post was so fucking stupid I won't even bother responding.
>>44215928
Christians used to be rather anti-capitalist because it was called "social Darwinism" and Darwinism = evolution = heresy
Religious fags don't think for themselves
>>44215951
>an ideology that went from no existent to every corner of the world in a few hundred years wasn't anything profound
This is what morons believe. I'm a fucking atheist too.
>>44210702
>The universe must have had a creator
>but god doesn't need one because logic is useless
This is what retards like you (read: theists) actually believe.
>>44215978
Jim Holt?
>>44216053
no because "social Darwinism" is a fucking inhumane way to set up a society. Catholics and Orthodox Christians have absolutely no problem with evolution lol.
Once again, American protestants sully the name of Christ.
>>44210805
Lacking belief in a claim takes no faith. What takes faith is to force yourself to pretend you believe in something that makes no sense and which carries no logic with it.
I don't have anything to prove, I don't have any belief or faith about your shitty sky fairy. I don't believe. That takes 0 faith.
>>44216077
>This is what morons believe. I'm a fucking atheist too.
Yes, you fucking goy. When you have the entire international jewish financial system stemming from Rome to Isfahan behind your cult, it's gonna spread fast.
Stupid fuck.
>>44212964
good job. you've just realized that our universe lacks any frame of reference.
we are simply energy with infinitely new sets of possible quantum fluctuations every second slowly being toyed with by fundamental forces of nature and entropy
>>44216053
Yeah, it's funny that the progressive/socialist movement was a religious response to percieved secular liberalism / libertarianism.
A century later and libertarianism and the like are considered the last vestige of freedom for the religious warriors, etc etc.
Personally I just think it shows that you should never equate science and theory with emotional and power-oriented politics.
Hurts all philosophical parties
>>44216129
Republicans are pro social darwinism (now called the free market).
The vast majority of Republicans are Christians. You can not get into the Republican party if you are not a Christian.
Though they are laxing that a bit. Romney was a Mormon and I'm surprised it was so readily accepted by other Christians. It too Catholics awhile to gain acceptance. But I guess they decided it was either a Mormon or a nigger.
>>44214499
the light simply has to be traveling through some sort of plane. we dont know for sure that the universe is expanding faster than lightspeed because how can you see what is beyond light?
>>44216102
John 1:1-3
1In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2He was in the beginning with God. 3All things came into being through Him, and apart from Him nothing came into being that has come into being.…
The point in history referred to in Genesis is fact. It is being misinterpreted however. The Universe was not created physically around us at the time. No, it was the point in which God flicked the switch and provided humans self-conciousness, faith and angency. It resulted in a higher-awareness of everything around us, the World, the Universe, each other and of God that separated us from animals. The Universe might have been around for millions of years but we did not have a greater awareness until we were provided the light from God a few thousand years ago. Is there any evidence of enlightened man prior to just over 6000 years ago when Creation happened?
>>44215825
Speak for yourself m8 I'm at peace with myself and my circumstance
>>44215951
As I said you have no grasp of the times they lived in.
They wouldn't even let you have a fire brigade in Ancient Rome because some rulers were so power hungry and corrupt they thought people who formed any sort of group would be a hazard to the State's rule.
Right after Jesus was persecuted the clamp down on his teachings were being exercised in full force by Rome and it says the disciples hide away in fear of death, the only reason they decided to risk their lives in the end I believe was because they saw Jesus had indeed risen from the grave.
Also his coming was foretold even down to how much Judas would sell him for, and I don't like apologetics but I will say they found evidence for Pontius Pilate the man who gave Jesus over to the Zionist Jews who mocked him and had him murdered.
>>44216077
>>an ideology that went from no existent to every corner of the world in a few hundred years wasn't anything profound
In that case, Islam is the true religion.
>>44216279
Cave paintings, tools, etc
>>44216208
Mormons, Evangelicals, Lutherans, Anglicans, Episcopalians, etc. are all heretics.anyway, and Protestants like those make up the bulk of the American conservative religious right.
If the religious right in America was Catholic, or Orthodox, you would have much less problems.
>>44216228
I don't care about your stupid book. I can write
"In the beginning was the universe" on a piece of toilet paper and it holds the same amount of truth value. 0.
You are actually too stupid to argue with though so I will just lay out the logical formula for you.
1 Everything that exists must have a cause
2 Every cause must have a cause itself
3 Without breaking this chain of causation we would never get to this current point of time
THEREFOR
There must have been an "uncaused cause."
Premise 3 and 1 are very easily challenged.
If you allow them, and you want an uncaused cause, you say it's god. But why couldn't it be the universe itself? You say god is the uncaused cause, I say you are adding complexity without reason which is against the laws of logic. The simpler answer is, if ANYTHING could always just "be" then it would be the universe, not some fucking stupid sky fairy who created the universe.
And if you say the universe COULD NOT have just existed forever, then I say neither could your god.
This is as far as you need to think to understand that argument for god is shit and yet I am guessing in your infinite arrogance and cognitive dissonance you will refuse to give up your shitty retarded religious belief which makes no sense and only serves to pat you on the dick.
>>44215183
>physicist
>doesn't understand that the big bang is a theory that explains the inflation of the universe, and posits nothing about its ultimate origin other than a "singularity"
yeah, fuck off faggot
>>44216228
>>44216358
>If the religious right in America was Catholic
Americans didn't accept Catholics in politics until Kennedy.
>>44210398
obvious straw man
the big bang theory proposes that we can only see as far back in time as to that point when all matter was infinitely dense, it says nothing about there being nothing before that point
>>44210398
just like the jew on stick
>>44216279
You got it! You're close to understanding the true meaning of Genesis, a near perfect fable that tells us so much about our natures.
Do you know why Genesis says that we started to die when Even and Adam ate from the tree of knowledge of good and evil? What other animal is aware of their death? none other.
>>44216363
>God can't be an uncaused cause because I said so
What was that about logic you were saying?
>>44216346
But were they really thinking about the Universe and God when they were doing cave paintings and hitting things with rocks to make other rocks to hit things with? No these were just a response to their surroundings with no significant sense of higher self-awareness.
>>44216395
thanks for pointing out this very well known fact to me. do you have any other platitudes you wish to share?
>>44216363
calm down, maybe the Universe is in God? or God is in the Universe? when it comes to this it is hard to differentiate them. Doesn't diminish belief in God.
>>44216456
Nice ID
>>44216456
What the fuck are they putting in the water in Australia
Anyone who believes in the big bang, are big morons' I'm sure they also believe that Chris Angel really can make a tank appear out of thin air. Fucking sheep
>>44216481
>thanks for pointing out this very well known fact to me. do you have any other platitudes you wish to share?
That America was fine the 200 years prior to Kennedy
>>44216440
I didn't say that you moron. I said that "God existing forever, then creating the universe, is more complex than saying the universe existed forever" And that by adding that extra layer of complexity you are breaking the laws of logic instead of going with the answer that makes more logical sense. If there is an "uncaused cause" then logic dictates that it should simply be the universe itself i.e. existence. Not that it should be a fucking sky fairy.
I would say nice try but it wasn't.
>>44216496
Better shit than litres of the hormone altering, endocrine disrupting carbonated-Jew you and your fellow countrymen in the states no doubt fill yourselves with everyday ;)
>it seems so blatantly obviously false
Ok ill take your word for it OP
>>44216513
I didn't say Kennedy was you saviour
I said if your religious right was Catholic instead of heretic protestant, you would have much less problems with their snake handling tongue speaking science denying bullshit
>>44216481
Actually it does because the word god doesn't mean anything anymore in that sense. "Maybe the universe is in god?" This is just stupid hippy mumbo-jumbo and again makes the words mean nothing.
The universe means ALL EXISTENCE. At least that is the useful terminology of it. Saying "all existence is in god" is pointless because again you don't define god as anything useful, yet you imply god is both in and out of existence.
It becomes hard to differentiate them because retards don't even know what they are talking about when they speak of god. They fail to define god and that is part of the reason the discussion starts so poorly. People are so stupid that they don't even know what they mean when they speak.
Belief in god is pretending to believe in something while at the same time not even knowing what you believe in. It is the ultimate form of stupidity.
>>44216323
>They wouldn't even let you have a fire brigade in Ancient Rome because some rulers were so power hungry and corrupt they thought people who formed any sort of group would be a hazard to the State's rule.
You're literally retarded. Go fuck an abo you stupid fuck.
What is the cult of Mithras? What is the Cult of Baal? Etc. They had plenty of religious institutions. The difference is none of them proclaimed themselves as the only true religion, at the same time opposing the personal power of the emperor.
That's why the Romans disliked Christians. Because they were seen as a more cunty version of jews.
Hey we got here because of the big bang. If you dont believe me go ask your mom and pop.
>>44216578
I'd say the belief in God Himself is not the belief that affects believers behavior most, but rather the associated logical conclusion and premises that arise from the root idea of God.
This is due to the admittedly muddled and confusing nature of God (near impossible to explain and define), and is why the Church is centered around God in His intelligible form, Jesus Christ.
just my opinion
>>44216279
>>44216456
i actually like what you're saying here about "light switch" metaphor. I'm reading The Ascent of Man right now, and i think i can posit a slightly less ridiculous theory than muh god however.
The cave paintings were early NOMADIC art painted by a lonesome person who would wander away from the rest of the tribe and delve into a higher cognitive state where he could create an immortal imprint of the world he saw around him.
These cave paintings were pretty much the only forms of art nomads left behind. They are crude because they are were drawn over a brief time while the camp would rest and continue the journey or the hunt soon. There is no way to take anything that is not of immediate survival value along with you when you're an early homo sapien nomad.
Around the same time, however. In tribes that learned how to grow crops, many other forms of art were being created. The probable reasoning behind why sedentary culture was not producing art as old as nomadic cultures could be the amount of protein they were eating. Nomadic diet consisted heavily of protein from animals, which allowed the frontal lobe (the origin of our consciousness) to grow abnormally quick, coupled with our obvious evolutionary advantages. Nomads actually did fairly well. It isnt until later that we see the Nomadic way of life is unsustainable and the agricultural revolution really unfolds.
>>44216515
So you're saying that the universe came to be birthed outside the bounds of logic but it couldn't have been done by something outside the bounds of logic?
I see. Thank you for enlightening me.
>>44215700
>How can people that genuinely believe in the scientific method accept the Big Bang THEORY as fact, when it is infact a THEORY, that might never be proven. Do they not realise that while they make the assumption of the Big Bang Theory as truth they are using faith.
>Classic Aussie shitposting
A theory has already been proven you dipshit, and anyone with a brain doesn't take it as complete infallible fact, its just the best explanation that we have due to our current understanding of matter, physics, and spacetime; when a more advanced theory comes around, it will replace it.
>>44211122
Underrated Post. The only reason it was ignored is because it actually makes sense.
>religitards in denial
>>44216693
The problem is, is that we are trying to rationalise the birth of the Universe within the laws and bounds of logic of the Universe itself. What if the Universe is a closed system? And the laws the govern the creation of the Universe exist outside the observale laws and logic of Universe itself and are entirely abstract to us. We might never be able to rationalise the laws that governed the creation of the Universe because they are abstract. The current laws which describe our current Universal system may point to intelligent design but we can't currently know for certain and may never know for certain. That's where faith comes in. Creationism admits itself to be a faith system. However the Big Bang THEORY is all to often accepted as a fact even though it implies uncertainty and faith.
>>44216621
I was making the point they were a very controlling state even down to such a thing like a fire brigade.
And if you read some history books like transcripts of roman heads of state and the understand unwarranted paranoia they had instead of believing everything you read in a google search you might get a better perspective m8
>>44216031
>>44216363
Pic related
>>44214433
You think because you don't take communion you're any better? fuck off you anglican faggot
>>44216693
>has existed forever, father of time, intelligence, life, space, logic and knowledge
>needs 10% of your income
hmm
>>44216622
Here, have that reply you so desperately want.
>babysfirstshitpost
>>44217132
Don't trigger them anon. They won't like that.
>>44216964
Like I said, there is nothing profound about the spread of Christianity. It started roughly about the same time as Mithraism and only became the official religion when Emperor Constantine started suffering from schizophrenic delusions.
I'm shocked it even took so long to gain popularity, seeing as the jews pretty much became goy-shepherds upon it's rise to popularity.
>>44217016
>tithing is necessary
>churches send money in a little Jesus envelope up to Heaven
>grasping at straws
> everything that exists must have a cause
>every cause must have a cause
>except for God because he is like super powerful and stuff lmao XD
How deluded do you have to be to actually believe this?
>>44217300
How deluded do you have to be to believe that human order can function without the belief of a cause in life??
Believing God created the universe will always be more red pill than trying to explain how the universe was made as fact.
Look around you on a sunny day. All the complexity that goes into everything in your field of vision alone is astounding, let alone our planet which is precisely placed just close enough to harbor life as it does. There's just too many perfect factors about our planet in a supposedly chaotic universe to not think there was some sort of divine plan.
>>44217406
>i have no idea what caused life
> therefore an invisible man with magic powers must have caused it!
Anyone with an iota of intelligence can see how retarded this is. Religion is the ultimate bluepill.
>>44213103
So Newton is still correct according to your theory?
>>44217300
>> everything that exists must have a cause
>>every cause must have a cause
>>except for before the Big Bang because that's not part of our model lmao XD
>>44216363
The Unmoved Mover.
>>44217453
>muh feels
>muh goldilocks zone
>muh entitlement
>>44217453
>wow so much complexity in the world wow
>surely this must be from intelligent design and not from decentralized processes such as evolution
>>44217485
I am not claiming to know how the big bang was caused, but that doesn't mean I should believe in a fairy tale written by cavemen.
>>44217264
>sending his son (who is also him) on a 33 year suicide mission filled with neat-o magic tricks and a zombie twist ending to circumvent rules he set into place for humanity (which he knew we would break in the first place) is the handiwork of the father of time, intelligence, life, space, logic and knowledge and anyone who doesnt believe this deserves eternal tourture, even if they live a good life
>also he needs to be tipped like a barista every sunday lel
>>44217256
Nothing profound? m8 assuming you are white, you'd still be fighting your tribal enemies somewhere in the middle of Europe of your statement was true.
Do you really know who the Jews are or what races the 12 tribes actually consisted of? having completely lost track of 9 of them from before the times of Rome. I'd say the answer is no.
Or that the fact the the ones in current day Israel are in a state that's is illegitimate and after the temple fell they should have been scattered across the earth?
You must not confuse wolves in disguise(false prophets) and sheep
>>44217477
>not realising that the true red pill might have been the "ultimate bluepill" laying in plain sight
>not understanding that we were indoctrinated over the course of the 20th century through multiple generations of social engineering
Ideological subversion was the technique used to socially engineer us. It realises the importance of not covering up the truth, and oftens positions the truth in plain sight and tricks us to think it is false.
>>44217485
evidence points heavily towards "singularity" over sky daddy with money troubles
>>44217664
Sounds similar to someone I've heard before.....who was that again.....
>>44217453
>fungus grows on a sock behind a toilet
>There's just too many perfect factors about this sock in a supposedly chaotic bathroom to not think there was some sort of divine plan.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murphy%27s_law
>>44217683
>singularity
How many singularities have been observed to date?
>You shall not allow a woman to live who practices sorcery. Exodus 22:18
>You have six days each week for your ordinary work, but the seventh day must be a Sabbath day of complete rest, a holy day dedicated to the LORD. Anyone who works on that day must be put to death. Exodus 35:2
>Your male and female slaves are to come from the nations around you; from them you may buy slaves. Leviticus 25:44
>Christians believe this
>>44217744
None. What's your point?
>>44217664
Just like what Christians have done in the past to tame people and punish non believers.
>>44217766
>I do not understand the difference between the Old and New Testaments
>fedorable
>>44215023
R
A
F L A G
E
>>44217766
those are jewish law codes
Christians follow the teachings of Christ only.
>>44217813
>the infalliable Christian God managed to fuck up on the first attempt of writing the Bible so he had to try again lol XD
>>44217664
>its all for us
>>44217744
cant see a black hole with your eyes genius, but mathematically, thousands.
they are at the center of most galaxies
>>44217836
>mfw Jesus was a hebrew and Christians everywhere worship him
>>44217453
So a near infinite amount of space and matter given a few billion years COULDNT POSSIBLY have hit the sweet spot for the development of life without some creator directing it?
Run the numbers on that and get back to me on just how "special" our planet is
And the universe is nowhere near as chaotic as you're imagining
>>44217836
Which is convenient.
>>44217683
>>44217744
Maybe our universe lies within a fabric of infinite singularities within an outside system which is not governed by the same laws and logic that govern our Universe. We might exist within a space of outside nothingness, no space, no time, no matter, which might also exist in a state of nothingness. How do you determine the laws of logic that governs a place with no space, no time or matter. Does God exist within that place of nothingness?
>>44210702
The big bang describes the creation of the universe not the creation of all matter you fucking cretin. Pull your head out of your ass
It's just based on the idea that everything was the same in the past as it is today, so if you look at the universe expanding today, you can assume that at one point everything was in the same place. It's a theory with basically nothing to it.
>>44216679
You're right, and that is why I generally consider myself anti-theist. Because the concept of god confuses people and then religions use that to control people. It is evil.
Better that we drop the whole idea and stick with what we know instead of what we "feel" or like to believe. Atheists, and even anti-theists, can be very spiritual. It just takes a different form that doesn't drive logical conclusions like the idea of a god does. It is a healthier form of spirituality imo.
>>44210398
Religion is the greatest brainwashing humans ever came up with. Shit spreads faster than a meme.
>>44217802
yes it is one of the most proven methods to provide people with a greater purpose to maintain a level of social order for civilisations to exist. People require a greater sense of purpose otherwise they just go full nihilistic and everything falls apart. Proving my earlier statement:
>>44217406
Contemporary "science" is just a neutered new-age, more accessible and inclusive universal version of religion to provide people with an understanding enough of the Universe to co-operate enough with the social-system.
However it's inherent nihilism is quite damaging in my opinion, leading to extreme versions of liberal deviancy we see today.
>>44217406
Well considering an estimated 108 million people have died in wars in the 20th Century (an estimated 150 million to 1 billion throughout history) that ''belief in life'' seems to be working pretty well for us.
>>44217908
uhhh? so the fabric of singularities being the fifth dimension?
the only thing that gives physics and the universe meaning or laws, is simply the interaction between quanta. there is no universe where there is no energy. it is just void.
>>44217908
I imagine the outside of the universe looking something like this, with other universes floating around as visible objects and God somewhere in there.
>>44216693
Actually I am only saying that we are using faulty logic when saying a god made the universe, and that in all probability we are akin to ants in a garden and cannot even comprehend the full "truth" of things.
That doesn't mean we just go and believe whatever the fuck though because beliefs have consequences.
>>44218066
>i can't take responsibility for myself
>i need an invisible man to tell me what to do at all times so I can be his slave
>muh "greater sense of purpose"
No thanks, anon.
>>44218069
>le all the wars in the 20th century were all over religion fallacy
>>44210398
kill yourself christfag
>>44218134
Not all wars are due to religion, but there have been many conflicts (such as the crusades or modern day jihad) that are waged by religious fanatics determined to punish non believers. Also, both the Bible and Quran encourage followers to kill non believers/infidels.
>>44218070
yeah who knows but the Big Bang Theory and suggests that there must be a system or absense of system outside of our universe to exist. How can we over know what the laws of logic of that system outside of our Universe were? How can we determine the laws of Physics which govern a void of space and time matter? This is shit that keeps me up at night.
>>44215989
You can't diminish sometho g that doesn't exist
>>44218069
A lot of the wars in the 20th Century was happening because of the disruption in social order that occured upon abandonment of old traditions in favour of new schools of thought and "revolutions" as well.
>>44218349
Which wasn't necessarily a bad thing.
>>44218245
I agree with this. Its just silly when people out right say stuff like: "All the wars ever were over religion!" or "If we all abandon religion we would be so much more peaceful!"
>>44218251
it's really just all about higher physical dimensions, anon..
The LHC has found that the projected mass of the Higgs Boson does not match what it should be to make our universe "stable". This lead many of the particle physicists to now believe the multiverse theory may hold some weight (literally) as the answer to the diminished mass of our unstable quantum friend may lie in another or all of the other verses. Therefore, your search for a unifying fabric of reality may lie in superstring theory or M-theory or the like.
One thing is almost certain, classical particle physics is on it's dying breath.
>>44218422
>classical particle physics is on it's dying breath.
hence why I find it silly that this sort of stuff was being taught as "fact" when there was a level of uncertainty and faith to it. Its no different to Creationism as a form of faith just a lot more nihilistic.
>>44210398
>science
>bluepill
Congrats on not being Australia thou
>>44218528
it is fact. just because it doesn't describe the overarching problems that the quantum revolution covers. it's still physics anon... it's just physics at subatomic scales. It laid the foundation upon which quantum mechanics could be studied.
Sorry to say, the abrahamic religions are incredibly archaic and will hold no bearing but as a children's fairytale in the future.
not to mention, in 150 or so years, the age of aquarius will be upon us and we'll still have the same old goddamn Jesus story representing pisces because nobody gives two shits about astronomy anymore, much less astrology.
>>44218557
"science" = bluepill
religion = bluepill
scientific method + the guidance of God = true red pill
>>44218079
>Actually think the CHRISTIAN GOD is a being outside the universe
Why are christians so retarded?
>>44218658
now you're talking
this is that top tier shitposting we expect from you down unda
keep it up
>>44218528
Please don't reproduce.
>science is the same as religion XD fallacy.
Creationism = god said it.
Science = a reasoned set of explanations and examinations of the empirical world.
The conclusions or premises explored in many scientific theories CAN and ARE found to be true or false but each works towards the other
Creationism has no real productive potential because it starts with a presumed to be infallible conclusion.
Thankfully there have been some religious scientists that still exercised skepticism beyond a magic "poof" into existence.
>>44210398
Big bang and theism aren't mutually exclusive bro. Just sayin'
>>44210398
>The big bang/atheism is the theory that in the beginning there was nothing,
I love this meme
>>44218644
3For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears;
4And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables
>>44218744
Classical particle physics isn't "a reasoned set of explanations and examinations of the empirical world."
It is outdated, hence it is no longer science. And how can we say that quantum physics all together are a viable explanation of the empirical world? Is the world at the quantum level the empirical world will we ever be able to actually examine the quantum level instead of use mathematics to interpret the quantum level based on a few assumptions. I understand that science is in constant process of refinement but to this day we can not say that quantum physics is the truth, it is not for certain.
>>44218806
>muh holy texts
you never wanna go full kebab, anon
>>44218775
>there was nothing
I love this meme also
>>44218806
you realize quoting bible passages makes you an unappealing conversation partner, right?
Sorry, but the bible prophesying its own doom at the end of the age is nothing new. Moses destroyed the golden bull and brought forth the new commandments for the age of aries. Then jesus comes along with his marxism and pushes aside the greedy jews who prospered from the old testament, and imposes a new socially conscious order.
Now come to /pol/ where we see chimp out threads daily. The time of technocratic resource-based socialist libertarianism is nigh. Away with ye, blasphemer from the forgotten age.
>>44218134
I wasn't claiming all wars had religion behind them, just pointing out that humanity has a fucked up value of life. Taking all the lives lost to murder, war and genocide along with the numerous species of animals we have driven into extinction through destruction of habitat and over hunting it's laughable to think we have any value for life at all.
>>44218878
>he completely misinterpreted what i meant by classical particle physics being outdated
it's all about scale anon... ah forget it. im gonna watch anime
>>44218349
>>44218377
Agreed but the sheer number of lost lives still makes my point valid. The number of people killed in revolutions and social upheaval is only a small fraction.
>>44219016
yeah that's exactly why a form of belief and/or rationalised purpose of life is needed to implemented into ourselves because otherwise humans by default do not give there life or any other life any value by default. Our brains are also very malleable too and can be programmed fairly easy.
Imagine for example if we found that we are only a virtual simulation, it would be scary because a lot of people would immediately rationalise that their life or no-one elses life has no value and show no hesitation in killing themselves or others.
>>44215672
>The big bang happened, like it or not.
I agree, but that doesn't stop there being an immense amount of speculation and disingenuous scientific "theory" being made about it. Honestly, it seems that research into the Big Bang theory has, for the most part, hit a brick wall that only affords progression on shaky footing at best.
>>44215935
Really though, so are things like evolution and the theory of relativity. While the scientific community tries to prove theories, for the most part they progress on without them, assuming that they are accurate enough to have practical relevance. The problem though - as we saw a few years ago with a failed light experiment - is that if something foundational is wrong or inaccurate, then potentially years of theoretical work and study can be wasted.
>>44210826
>Georges LeMaitre
>atheist
top kek
he was a Catholic Priest.
>>44217484
With regards to matter/energy conservation, sure (he still got some things on mechanics a bit wrong but that's another subject) - you can't create energy but you can change how it's broken up and distributed.
Systems are statistically more likely to move towards a configuration which maximizes entropy so "something" spontaneously appearing out of "nothing" is extremely unlikely but not impossible. There's a theoretical precedent for it in the manifestation of virtual particles.
>>44218878
Quantum physics is as solid of a field as relativity or electromagnetism - the predictions it makes work and can be derived from the theory's first principles.
>>44210398
>It seems so blatantly obviously false, how can NOTHING exploded to become SOMETHING?
Except it doesn't say that. You can't look before the big bang, or even theorise as to what may have been before the big bang, or even, really, philosophise about what may have been before the big bang, as there is no time before the big bang, thus there is no before to be had.
You can say pic realted, but it's pure conjecture, as there's no way to gather observational evidence, nor any way to mathematically calculate what came before the singularity. It's no better a guess than "God", the Flying Spaghetti Monster, or a giant magical pony, save maybe in the smoothness of consistency.
Big bang theory says nothing about what came before the big bang - it merely says "we don't know - and we may never know.", instead of leaping directly to "God did it."
But I'll link this anyways:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-EilZ4VY5Vs
>>44216102
Logical fallacy, you cannot expect the creator of something to be bound by its own rules. If God created everything including the laws of physics then it is reasonable to assume he is not bound by them. As an example, you would not expect the creator of the game of chess to be bound by its rules.
>>44219239
>the predictions it makes work and can be derived from the theory's first principles.
Wow the predictions it makes on other predictions based on theories that are based off theories that are not quite fact and may never be observed means its totally solid and factual!
>Systems are statistically more likely to move towards a configuration which maximizes entropy so "something" spontaneously appearing out of "nothing" is extremely unlikely but not impossible.
How about this, what if in every something, there is nothing, in every nothing there is everything?
>>44218251
We can determine some of the laws because we can observe them there are multiple dimensions and some are hypothesised some are proven
1. Height
2. Width
3. Depth
4. Time
5. Kaluza–Klein combination of gravitation and electromagnetism - 5th dimension.
And there are higher ones but there is still research into those dimensions on going.
Literally everything we see (matter that can reflect light) is only 5% of everything, some of it is dead stars and debris but the work in analysing the smashed atoms at the lhc which lead to the Higgs boson discovery is believed to be associated with the dark energy out there
>>44216959
comments like this are why I love 4chan
>>44219340
>As an example, you would not expect the creator of the game of chess to be bound by its rules.
Why wouldn't you quit while you were behind?
>>44219404
Time is not a dimension.
>>44219440
Not that he isn't on crack, but yes, yes it is.
Unless you've got some newfangled theory I've not heard of.
>>44219464
Time is not a dimension.
Only spatial properties can dimensions.
>>44219404
Thanks for showing me this I wasn't aware of these new developments into Kaluza-Klein/higher dimension order of physics. I had always speculated that light and quantum physics was operating beyond our current observable dimensions.
>>44219305
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4IJLZO7o4Ak
>>44216959
>However the Big Bang THEORY is all to often accepted as a fact even though it implies uncertainty and faith.
Excuse me sir, your scientific ignorance is showing.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity
The alternative is even stupider.
There exists one superpowerful being who has always existed and exists for absolutely no reason without being created by anything.
This superpowerful being somehow has the ability to create anything from nothing instantly and to do anything and be everywhere at every time.
Instead of creating another superpowerful being to be its bro, it decided to create useless simple creatures that do nothing but eat and fuck, because evidently that's more amusing.
>Atheists are still so butthurt that they reply seriously to a troll post
>>44219482
X,Y,Z,Time. Or to abbreviate the whole shabang, time-space. Time is a coordinate, and thus a dimension in the standard model.
>>44219482
you need to reevaluate relativity m8
dont be antiscientific thats for retarded mudslimes
>>44219518
Time is not a dimension. Look at a cube, where the fuck is the temporal dimension on it.
>>44219499
wow thanks yeah gravity must be undeniable evidence that the big bang happened woah thank you you sure showed me
fuck off nerd
>>44219183
A misplaced, false even, belief in a deity/higher power wouldn't keep me sane. Life inherently has no meaning and we can't prove otherwise. The universe is a muddled and chaotic series of events that we can't (and probably never will) be able to explain.
>>44219557
A reference point to when the cube was made, its orientation over time and the point in which it for some reason exists, those are some examples of the temporal dimension.
>>44219557
When is the cube.
If time wasn't a dimension, the cube would exist everywhen at once.
Time is a coordinate. We're just stuck traveling on one direction on its axis.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spacetime
Unless you're building your own model of the universe, time is a dimension.
>>44219595
Cool if you feel sane enough with your nihilistic perspective of the universe that is fine. Keep in mind that is your choice to live that life and run from God but God is always there to provide you the order if you ever need it my friend.
>>44219305
thanks
>>44219390
>Wow the predictions it makes on other predictions based on theories that are based off theories that are not quite fact and may never be observed means its totally solid and factual!
Sounds like you haven't read up much on the last... 120-odd years of physics.
>>44219404
The Higgs is a predicted boson connected with a mechanism predicted by Peter Higgs and Francois Englert which determines why some particles have mass and why others like photons and gluons, do not.
>>44219482
Space and time are not, strictly speaking, independent of one another. Fields and intertial paths exist in four-space.
>>44219571
You realize that the layman definition for theory and the scientific definition are different, right?
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_theory
>>44217870
explain why the new testament was written in Greek first if they were all Hebrews
>>44218989
Okay Zionist pharisee the bible is bullshit they didn't predict anything not the Kings arrival and we all just knew one day people would start believing what they saw on TV instead of what was written on their hearts, it was bound to happen right?
And this is with the assumption everyone was even believing when the verse I posted was written.
All cultures talk about the ages of man we are in the last age the Clay and Iron Age. Don't believe me? Look at the iron cities as to the mud brick ghettos
>>44217721
>>44219710
Because Aramaic was the most common language spoken in Israel in Jesus' time?
>>44219710
explain how "christ is lord" if Odin fullfilled his promise to rid the world of ice giants.
>>44219685
>Sounds like you haven't read up much on the last... 120-odd years of physics.
yeah I'll get to it after I'm finished reading and internalising the Bible and then a lot of early science literature, making my eventual way chronologically up to contemporary science to see for myself just how solid it is thank you very much.
>>44219685
>>44219819
Don't think I won't be fact-checking everything and doing my own experiments at home along the way aswell to make sure everything works out.
>>44219595
Do something with your life that is the opposite of what Christianity has done, i mean if we are all brain washed and backwards you should be doing something that is 180 of what most people are doing.
>Atheists Gamble
You cant comprehend that humans formulating the idea of God was part of the universal mathematics of the universe. You just cast it aside as worthless and pretend you have everything figured out, while you pretend you are the most enlightened generation known to man yet there have been atheists thought out history with the same exact pretentious behavior. It all comes down to you not analyzing it for yourself. You just think that because some asshole says god is a magik being in outer space thats what everyone understands god as....... thats exactly how stupid you are, a childs way of thinking
https://youtu.be/Q8uONLM5U-I?t=3m36s
>>44219892
>>44217453
>>44219675
I'm not that bothered to be honest. Figuratively speaking, if there was a god, I'm confused as to why he'd send me to an eternity in hell just because I chose not to believe in him/her/it/whatever when I had no rational evidence to prove otherwise. Is God, an omnipotent being really that fucking vein?
>>44219781
Christ fulfilled the prophecys of the jews, he told them he came to abolish their laws because they were of the devil. He told them if you follow me you will be saved. As we can see there are still a bunch of jews that do not follow christs prophecy and they suffer because of it.
Would you argue that jesus's was of doctrine is false? Would you rather a society that is centered around Law and only law (the way we are headed because of you autists) Should no one care of this morality?
You idiots like to think this shit was written by god when its writers only claim god instructed them, MENAING they were able to formulate what they viewed as a great teaching for mankind. Go ahead destroy all notion of this religion, do you not think the exact opposite of "utopia" can occur on this earth?
>>44219685
Yes but the reason because it could relate to dark energy is because there simply is not enough mass our there the account for the vastness so the term dark is used for the massive spaces that seem to 'hold' everything in place
>>44219482
Just because you cannot see a UV ray does not mean it's not there, and because we observe gravity which is the curvature of space-time by mass warping we know 'time' is a property that can be 'measured' or at least added to a list of things we are still understanding
>>44219940
wtf are you trying to say? fucking respond with at least a fucking sentence that is not snarky. Refute what i say, try me
Reality contains itself so it cannot have an external cause. reality is all of existence. if X was created by Y, and X is real, then Y is also real. therefore reality is a self-creating process. this process by which the universe (reality) generates itself is comparable to a reflexive, self-selecting algorithm or function, and is isomorphic to 'consciousness' in that it is perceptual in nature and relies on information processing. this self-caused process inflicts constraints on itself informationally by perceiving and 'reflecting' on the information, which results in structure, and thus increasingly complex structures by recursion. This structure is describable as a language, where the components (symbols) of it could be mapped (isomorphically) to the 'material', i.e. represented as physical quanta to a perceiving entity, where the laws of physics are comparable to the syntax of the language. ultimately i think it is appropriate to qualify the 'perceiver' in which this 'language' has been constructed (from which all systems in the universe, including our own minds, are patterned) as a mind. 'before' this self-generation there was an unbound 'ground-state' of infinite potential (no constraint--no structure required to explain). the system brings itself into existence as a means of atemporal communication between its past and future whereby law and state, syntax and informational content, generate and refine each other across time to maximize total systemic self-utility
>>44219892
Your putting words into my mouth. I wasn't claiming to be any more advanced than anyone else on this bored, just refuting some points made earlier in this thread.
>>44220064
Humankind has sought a simple, universal theorem representing the ultimate building block of nature. In searching, we have learned that energy and matter are complementary states of reality. Self-Utility -- A Theory of Everything explains how within this universal design principle, "process" is also a complementary state of this same reality. Within this informational framework lies this unifying theory of existence -- Self-Utility. Self-Utility represents a model of internal attributes that initiate causal outcomes. Self-Utility is an intrinsic determinism that wills its host's animation, wellbeing, and its existence! Self-Utility is inherent in humans, animals, plants, social systems, institutions, organizations, rocks, atoms, energy, ideas and even the cosmos itself. Self-Utility unites a diversity of "-ologies" under its common discipline. Personal application of this theory empowers us with a cognitively heightened sense of understanding, of insight, and of control over our behavior and ultimately of whom we are. Embracing the concept of Self-Utility gives us a reference to understand the dynamics of vast interacting networks of any type. It allows us to predict values and allegiances, thus ultimately predicting the behaviors of people, organizations and objects. And it empowers us to direct our being through interrelating cycles of influence. Self-Utility brings order to our whimsical World of whirling dervishes as if in a mystic circus.
>>44219964
Because God provides a set of fundamental rules or comamdments which are optimised to ensure the continuation of healthy civilised humanity generation to generation (assuming that everyone follows these commandments). Hell was created as the deterrent. A couple of hundred years ago, people started to get the idea that they could create a utopia or heaven on Earth, only if they disobey some of the commandments however. Now we are starting to see some results of how damaging this is to maintaining generation to generation of this in modern day liberalism because they have more self-centered views and morals where they performin hedonistic acts of pleasure seeking, following their dick tingles and vaginal tingles, illicit drug taking without any form of restraint while disregarding that they might be jeopardising the next healthy generation.
>>44220064
Damn anon.......
>>44219964
When you start up a mathematical algorithm that creates life do you think god has the ability to intervene?
This mathematical algorithm has suffering and pleasure.
God is the programmer, he turned on the computer and the program booted up and only has the ability to shut the computer off, that is a pretty easy way to understand it. So you pretty much curse god for giving consciousness to you....
>>44220034
>Would you argue that jesus's was of doctrine is false?
How can one debate such iron-clad logic?
>Should no one care of this morality?
Should they not indeed?
>>44220064
tl;dr
>>44220170
It'd be wasted on someone like you anyway.
>>44220128
>There are people who think the entire universe was made for humans, there are people this retarded
>>44220128
There's definitely a lot of fucked up things happening in the modern world but it's definitely not because of junkies chasing a high or faggots bumming. Seriously anon?
>>44220194
You said it.
>>44220135
If god made the universe, then what made god?
Please see my other post >>44220064
>>44220125
>>44220194
We can't even comprehend how much of an insignificant spec we are in the grand scale of the universe and existence itself.
>>44210398
The Big Bazinga theory, as the theory of *OUR* creation, isn't too obscene. The idea that it created everything is absolutely absurd, though.
>>44220044
True, we don't have an experimentally validated model for dark matter or dark energy yet, although we have managed to rule quite a few things out.
Massive compact object distributions of matter in the halos of galaxies was for many years seen as the strongest hypothesis, but with that basically ruled out tat this point the smart money is on some kind of weakly interacting background matter.
The predominant theory for dark energy for the moment comes in the form of a kind of cosmological constant, ironic considering that Einstein tried to conjure up a similar physical constant while grappling with the implications of his own theory of general relativity that a static and eternal universe was inherently unstable. Now, however, the concept of some kind of universal constant influencing the behavior of space is not about allowing the Universe to remain static but rather explain the observed expansion of it.
Theories on a cosmological constant today suggest something like a 'cost of space', the metric expansion of space carries with it an energy cost, a negative energy density which balances out the shifting positive energy densities of matter, radiation, etc.
Wish I could stay and chat more but I've got to grade exams tomorrow. Have a nice night /pol/
>>44220194
pretty scary that people who think this way are the majority by over 90% of humanity.
>>44220237
>but muh earth created in 7 days
>b-but muh metaphors!!!
>>44220145
If you had the ability to exterminate every human off the face of the planet , or possibly choose a few you wanted to save. Would you do it? Wouldn't it be interesting to have that kind of power and figure out what it would feel like to actually have the entire planet to yourself?
If a man had this power in the future with a biological weapon but he had faith in Christ and decided not to use the weapon but instead hand it over to researchers to form a vaccination would you still argue Christianity was worthless?
>>44220270
Do you really have nothing better to say? I think you've pretty much exhausted your collection of arguments.
>>44220194
Do you understand what the odds of intelligent life forming are? Not life, but intelligent life. Tell me the statistical odds because obviously you have them if you know for a fact what you state.
>>44220328
No he dosnt , these people have absolutely no ability to think outside the box. Its like when jesus was preaching to the jews, they all hated him.
95% of the people in this thread are jews, thats what they have a hard time understanding
>>44220354
Obviously, the odds are greater than zero, because here we are. When someone wins the lottery, does that prove there is a god?
>>44220354
From what we've experienced so far yes the odds are low but the sheer scale of the universe (and the possibility of a mulitverse) makes these odds still possible.
>>44220064
Once we entirely reverse-engineer the software (logic, language, information processing, syntax, etc.) which governs reality, will we then be able to determine the hardware of reality and our Universe?
>>44220354
>whatever can happen, will happen
No, let's just trust what people said 2000 years ago (re: retards) because they couldn't explain flooding
>>44220128
still waiting for a reply to this >>44220199
too btw....
>>44220354
>Do you understand what the odds of intelligent life forming are?
Intelligent life didnt spontaneously form. Basic life (micro organisms) formed and over hundreds of millions of years evolved one species on earth out of the 90000000000001 other species to be intelligent.
Seems reasonable to me.
>how can NOTHING exploded to become SOMETHING?
I didn't get how retards can't accept the idea that the universe formed on its own from nothing, but are perfectly fine with the idea that God formed on its own from nothing.
>>44220306
Is an extremely hypothetical scenario such as that your only reason for Christianity having any value? Okay you faggot, when that does happen I can guarantee I'll eat my own words.
>>44220125
What if this self-utility accross all of our sciences is just a subjective manifestation of humanity's inherent longing for order? We wanted order and self-utility in our understanding of everything so we ordered it ourselves that day and we might eventually find that one day there actually is no greater self-utility to the universe.
>>44220471
what the fuck are you even talking about? they teach biblical books to children differently then what an adult interprets them as. You know like when you read alice in wonderland as a child, and re-read it as an adult.
You still have the basic 5 year olds understanding of the bible along with 95% of the people here. Your a goddam child
>>44220266
Yes Einstien thought his theory was the constant throughout the universe but Fritz Zwicky
who Einstien snubbed at first was the first to notice that in a cluster called the Coma galaxy cluster did not weigh up to the hypothesised weight based on visibility
>He calculated the gravitational mass of the galaxies within the cluster and obtained a value at least 400 times greater than expected from their luminosity, which means that most of the matter must be dark.
>American posters
>>44220306
Dude, I live here. Why would I want to fuck it up, fer chrissakes? I don't want to live in shitty world. This is the true core of ethics.
Why give up your seat to someone who needs it on a bus? Because it's a shitty fucking world where people don't. Who wants to live in a shitty fucking world? Not me.
It's an way awesomer world where everyone helps out each other and isn't a dick, so, I being a subset of everyone, try to help other people and not to be a dick so that I can live in a world where everyone is like that.
Point to the place where the creator of the universe is necessary to this logic.
I don't know why I'm talking about ethics in a cosmology thread, but I've already typed all this, so fuckit.
>>44220354
>Do you understand what the odds of intelligent life forming are?
Drake equation runs from 2.1 to 27,000 such civilizations per galaxy, depending on what numbers you plug into it.
Granted, that assumes carbon based and very similar to us - doesn't take into account for more radical theories of alien "life" and social structures.
...and it also assumes we constitute intelligent life, and this thread kinda puts a bit of a hole in that.
>>44210398
Fuck off Christfag.
>>44212964
How did this something get to be ?
>>44220571
answer the question would you kill off every human being?
>>44220604
The Drake Equation is just a way of organizing your wild speculation and wishful thinking. It's meaningless.
>>44220354
Do you realize how fucking big the universe is?
Even if only one star system in every billion produced an intelligent species, that's still billions of intelligent species in the universe.
>>44220194
M8 I haven't said anything like that the entire thread fuckhead
I have simply talked about how religion is a means of rationalising the universe providing us with a greater purpose which gives us the social order to form civilisations and that science is almost a new-age form of religion.
>>44214499
Expansion is not bounded by relativistic effects.
>>44220645
Didn't say otherwise, but what else can you do with a question like, "Do you understand what the odds of intelligent life forming are?"
Increasingly though, potentially life supporting planets seem to be more common than we ever expected, and we're increasingly finding life living under more severe conditions than we ever expected. And yeah, universe be big, so there's little doubt it's out there, somewhere... There is some doubt, however, as to whether it's physically possible for us to ever reach or contact each other.
>>44220644
Personally? Probably not, there's already enough suffering in this world because of the acts of mankind, I don't see the point in adding to it. But yes, i see where you're coming from, someone with similar beliefs to my own might take the opinion that the vast majority of us are expendable (they wouldn't be wrong). That situation will never arise though.
>>44220713
>There is some doubt, however, as to whether it's physically possible for us to ever reach or contact each other.
There's also the question of what kind of life.
We've been around a few thousand years, depending on definition a few hundred thousand, out of billions. Worth looking at, maybe 20,000 years. And we've almost killed outselves already.
What are the odds we hit that sliver of advancement on other planets? We may find some plants that in a billion years result in intelligent life, or a planet that seems lifeless, but a billion years ago had life.
>>44214499
http://www.askamathematician.com/2014/03/q-how-can-the-universe-expand-faster-than-the-speed-of-light/
The universe doesn't expand at a particular speed, it expands at a speed per distance. Distant galaxies are “getting farther away”, but oddly enough they are not “moving away”.
>>44220713
I actually agree with entirely, my good sir. I misread your post, so please forgive a stoner.
It also may be mainly single-celluar or just something like RNA replicating in most places. Big, weird, self-aware colonies like us may be very rare, indeed.
You need a highly stable star system (not a lot of rocks flying around), the right chemicals, and I would go so far as to say the dynamo (Van Allen Belt) is necessary.
>>44220536
>>44220536
It's foolish to accept either as fact until its proven, until then its faith. If its faith, its religion.
also nice autism nerd
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2039690/Atheism-autism-Controversial-new-study-points-link-two.html
>>44220839
>You need a highly stable star system (not a lot of rocks flying around)
That's actually the easy part. Planets clear out their paths naturally.
>>44220839
Actually, rocks stop radiation just fine - don't need a radiation belt - though then you still some way for the life to gain energy, without being fried.
Theoretically, you can have life living without any sun at all. There's plenty of rogue planets drifting through space that still generate their own heat due to mass and gravity, and may have water in their interiors (certainly ice on their exteriors).
But yes, it's all fanciful supposition, until we get out and find something - or something finds us.
>>44220578
you are exactly anon, its necessary to revisit the bible as an adult because the shit from the bible we are taught as a kid is like g-rated, watered-down, blue-pilled sjw shit.
>>44219964
>>44219964
well if you read the bible hell is not not meant for us it says the fallen angels were put there "awaiting judgment in Tartarus" because they witnessed creation but still went aganist their creator, god wants to give us all the fruit to the tree of life which was in eden at the start, "he wishes none shall perish but have eternal life" seeing as we having filled ourselves with the fruit of knowlegde and know good and evil we know "the wages of sin is death".
But fear not for the bible is riddled with clues that jesus has overcome death and reigns ruler of the world making "footstools of his enemies"
>>44220199
why do you think fucked up things happen today in the modern world then?
>>44220950
>>44220950
I'm not even dignify that with a proper response because it goes off topic.
>>44220950
why wouldn't they?
also, bad is objective
>>44221008
nice normie meme
>>44221074
Meh, that shit far predates the internet.
Actually had something akin to it posted up in our church library... (UU, of course.)
>>44221097
>televangilsm
not knowing a satanist when he's talking to you
>http://www.dmagazine.com/publications/d-magazine/2011/july/why-i-stole-televangelist-mike-murdocks-safe?single=1
>spin(1995)
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0114512/fullcredits?ref_=tt_cl_sm#cast
>>44217766
You know very well Exodus and Leviticus are jewish text. You use quotes from the bible to to discredit Christians but when a Christian quotes from the Torah we are anti smites. In Christianity Exodus and Leviticus historical books depicting the way of life before Christ. And the only people who follow such books are jews like yourself. Fuck Off SJW we don't want your shit here
>>44215693
If Christianity is true. Then we are the only intelligent life in the universe. Why create so much extra space and waste?
>For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son
>only
This is why Christianity aka jew religion spin off con game is just silly.