[trigger warning] >Nearly 2015. >Love still being something

[trigger warning]

>>402823900
OP are you a pedo? No because even without law i wont think it's woul be good to gor for a 12y old and less.

File: 1401792123591.jpg (140KB, 1024x731px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 1024x731px

[trigger warning]

A result of feminist influence on federal law.

[trigger warning]

>>40282390

>Year of our lord 2014
>Christmas fucking eve

>Even today asking /p0l/ why you can't fuck little girls.

[trigger warning]

This coming from a Dago, of course.

[trigger warning]

>>40282429
>A result of feminist influence on federal law.
Tell me more.

File: 1390205273620.jpg (63KB, 367x604px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 367x604px

[trigger warning]

>>40282467
- Feminists raised the age of consent from 7 in America to 16/18.
- Feminists as late as the '70s suppressed scientific studies suggesting children were more active partners in adult-child sex than was believed.
- Feminists have everything to gain. Men are assumed pedophiles, and women are never. Also, women get lighter sentences for these types of crimes.

[trigger warning]

>>40282390
>sexual lust
>love

[trigger warning]

ITT: Degenerates

[trigger warning]

>>40282505
>being this evil-minded.

[trigger warning]

>>40282497

I dont even need to look at your trip anymore. I just need to read whats being posted. If it's pro pedo, it's usually you typing it.

[trigger warning]

>>40282529
I'm not the only one who supports hot pocketsdom for everyone regardless of age.

File: bbun.gif (939KB, 255x164px) Image search: [Google]

939KB, 255x164px

[trigger warning]

love and lust are not the same thing

if trips, BTFO

[trigger warning]

>>40282550
double doubles
That will do.

[trigger warning]

>>40282390
Agreed, sex should not at all be controlled by the State, it should be controlled by the family.

[trigger warning]

>>40282522
>evil minded

There is only one kind of love from an adult to another pre-pubescent and that is parental love. The moment you try to have other acts with pre-pubescents it becomes lust.

File: 4chanpartyvan.jpg (113KB, 750x600px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 750x600px

[trigger warning]

>>40282497

This aboistani is going to get party v& by his government I bet even talking about shit like this is illegal there.

[trigger warning]

>>40282652
If you draw two stick figures having sex and label them 10 years old I might get v& for CP.

[trigger warning]

>>402825400

If you read what I typed, you wouldn't even need to reply back with that response.

[trigger warning]

>>402826666
lolstralia

File: 1393086320047.png (859KB, 619x947px) Image search: [Google]

859KB, 619x947px

[trigger warning]

>>40282713
Do my posts trigger you? You know, since you're a feminist mouthpiece and all that.

[trigger warning]

>>40282626
>romantic love between a man and a little girl can't be real love
Why?

[trigger warning]

You can love all you want. You just can't touch.

[trigger warning]

>>40282780
Sure? Just go out, and say to someone "I love little girls".

File: 1390128222661.jpg (71KB, 541x960px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 541x960px

[trigger warning]

>>40282780
Why not? Under 10% of all adult-child sex is reported. You have an over 90% chance of getting away with it :^)

[trigger warning]

>>40282743
>romantic love

The only reason an adult would want to "love" a little girl is for lust. If it was the other it would be parental love. The hormones are explained as such.

[trigger warning]

>>402828655
Where would the love even build from?
The multitude of hobbies/interests they share?
Lol
>ITT socially inept nubs who cant mingle with adult women

[trigger warning]

See, the thing I don't get about pedo love is once the loli grows up do you just stop loving her? That's not fair to the loli and it mean you don't really love her and just want her as your personal sex doll.

File: 1418593992817.jpg (30KB, 283x438px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 283x438px

[trigger warning]

>>40282913
>can't quote
>doesn't understand parental love
>is australian

< do it

[trigger warning]

>>40282390
What, in your mind, constitutes "love."

[trigger warning]

>>40282913

pls remove last digit when replying :)

make /p0l/ a better place

[trigger warning]

>>40282918
What happens with a guy after he's with a woman for a number of decades? Does he just leave her because she's old and used up and no longer the beautiful woman he fell in love with?

[trigger warning]

>>4028294
First time on tumblr
/b/ for 5 years lol

File: 1374258181689.jpg (2MB, 1130x2356px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1130x2356px

[trigger warning]

File: 1419309691919.jpg (15KB, 358x272px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 358x272px

[trigger warning]

>OP thinks primitive, unhealthy sexual lust is the same as love

love yourself

[trigger warning]

>>40283023

>Very first faq

Homosexuality is a mental illness and riding off the fact that they fucked with the government to change that means that all pedos are liberal progressives and thus enemies of /p0l/

[trigger warning]

>>40283017

That is called love for going through all the struggles without looking at the age. Be carefull with your next reply and especially think about the age.

[trigger warning]

>>40282918
For me people is not disposable. You can feel attraction for young or older people, and appreciate them as they are.

[trigger warning]

>>40283023
>wants to be accepted as homophiles
>blames feminists for banning paedophilia
>knows that feminists support faggots

What a faggot.

[trigger warning]

>>40283017
If a pedophile can be attracted to a grown woman then why mess with a child to begin with? Oh that's right you have a child fetish and as soon as your loli sex mistress is of age you'll dump her and find another one.

What about the loli's feelings?

[trigger warning]

>>40282440
if you cant be one fuck one

[trigger warning]

>>40282497
>- Feminists raised the age of consent from 7 in America to 16/18.

There is not and has never been a federal age of consent within the United States.

Cwin your butthole and stop trying to speak through it.

File: images (9).jpg (16KB, 263x192px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 263x192px

[trigger warning]

>>402823900
Spanish poster. obviously has no clue about the US opinion discarded.

[trigger warning]

>>40283082
Don't you ever hear about 40 year old men meeting women 10 or 20 years younger than them and falling in love?

Why can't a 30 or 20 year old fall in love with a ten year old?

File: faget desu.png (113KB, 282x224px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 282x224px

[trigger warning]

>>40283194
>falling in love

[trigger warning]

>>402823900
>2015
>Pedo still held at bay by laws and politicians
All is right with the world.

[trigger warning]

>>40283214
Or get this, what if someone wants to have consensual sex with a 10 year old? What if the 10 year old wants to have sex? I was masturbating when I was 9 years old, so it wasn't like it's some mystery. With the prevalence of porn and sexual imagery in our media, it shouldn't come as a surprise that children are becoming aware of sex at a young age.

[trigger warning]

>>40283194
You already know why, it's because society has deemed a child's consent meaningless and even if you don't agree, most reasonable people would call it a gray area, at best.

There are plenty of fish in the sea, if you don't have a child fetish, then why insist on fucking/dating/marrying a child?

[trigger warning]

>>40283261
>what if

If that 10 year old would be able to understand the whole reasoning of intercourse that person wouldn't accept it. Simple reason one, at that age there is almost no sign of reproduction. And for them to be able to give consent they have to have a certain mind capacity and experience.

They could experiment with each other at that age group, but it is an experiment which no one should be known off.

[trigger warning]

>>40283297
>They could experiment with each other at that age group
Maybe if you want to promote promiscuity you should go somewhere else, like plebbit.

[trigger warning]

>>40283261
just no. if there's one thing we're still able to control, it's our children. and laws regarding them. 10 year olds don't understand sex. they haven't even gone through puberty yet. we own em til they're 18 or 16 at least. little genetic slaves.

[trigger warning]

>>40284078
>if there's one thing we're still able to control, it's our children
No, the State controls them.

File: 1375581591874.jpg (47KB, 500x750px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 500x750px

[trigger warning]

>>40283112
1. All the states raised at the same time.
2. You're wrong. There are federal child-specific sex crimes that have hard age limits.

[trigger warning]

>>402828655
Dutch bro up in here rekting pedos and shit.

[trigger warning]

>>40282390
>nearly 2015
>"loving" prepubescent children is still OK for some people

Go diddle your own anus

[trigger warning]

>>40284027
>implying children don't do that

Even if it is not on purpose they play doctor and house and all that shit you idiot. That is was experimenting means. It doesn't mean directly penis in vagina.

[trigger warning]

>>40284167
>2. You're wrong. There are federal child-specific sex crimes that have hard age limits.

Involving international sex tourism. That's why I said
>within the United States

File: 1411401664331.jpg (99KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 1000x1000px

[trigger warning]

>You'll never be an adorable little boy in the Hitler Youth before going to fight and die for the Fatherland against the foreign hordes.

Why even bother?

[trigger warning]

>>40282390

https://master

chan.org/b/thread/55592

there you go OP. Enjoy it

[trigger warning]

The whole premise of wanting to fuck a child is sick and wrong.

[trigger warning]

>>40284346
Nope. Again, there are federal child-specific sex crimes based on hard limit ages. Isn't it embarrassing I know more about this issue in your own country than you do?

[trigger warning]

>>40284369
>I don't like it so it's wrong!

[trigger warning]

>>402823900
Isn't the age of consent in Little Mexico like 10 or something?

[trigger warning]

>>40284427
You have a mental perversion which causes you to be attracted to adult women.

I can say things too.

File: art admirer.jpg (128KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 800x600px

[trigger warning]

>>40284459

FUCK OFF NIGGER
U
C
K

O
F
F

N
I
G
G
E
R

[trigger warning]

>>40284369
Why? Because you've been taught that it should hurt your fee-fees?

[trigger warning]

if she can biologically have children then what is wrong with fucking her?

[trigger warning]

>>40284377

It is wrong. You have a mental perversion stemming from possible repressed trauma in your past. This atypical makeup causes you to be attracted to prepubescent children. I know you art admirer. I recommend you seek counselling for your illness lest you wind up in prison due to what is on your harddrive or by your actions. Pedophilia will never be acceptable in this society. Sane rational people feel a deep seeded need to protect the next generation from being exploited and hurt. You are on a dangerous path by being outspoken on your fetishizing of kids.

[trigger warning]

>>40282540
Freedom is taking advantage of a non sexual child you fucking freak. I would love you if you looked at my child. Son of a bitch

[trigger warning]

>>40284510
It doesn't need to be accepted. Over 90% of adult-child sex is never reported. But, since it was accepted for the majority of history and was only changed by feminists who you now blindly parrot I don't think you're right either.

>>40284533
>non sexual child
Children can be sexually aroused well before puberty. Can you into biology?

[trigger warning]

>>402844933
You are a joke of a Christian. Maybe when you have a daughter of your own you'll understand.

[trigger warning]

god triggerede age-of-marriage to be puberty

government created a race of man-children

[trigger warning]

>>402830822
>If a regular person can be attracted to an old woman, why mess with the hot 20yo to start with?

Stop telling other people how they feel, faggot.

File: think of the children.png (707KB, 1131x832px) Image search: [Google]

707KB, 1131x832px

[trigger warning]

>2014
>not thinking of the children

[trigger warning]

>>402823900
Hi there my fellow countryman.

Are you a pedo? Why? Dont you like girls of your age?

[trigger warning]

>>40284602
1) I'm not a Christweenie, I don't believe in the supernatural, that's just the name I use for posting and 2) I support strong traditional families with a strong man as the head of the household and girls marrying early, if there's something wrong with wanting men to have control over their own families then so be it.

[trigger warning]

>>40284701
I've seen you make Christian generals you faggot.
I don't care if an older man fucks a teenage girl. But only barbaric societies have ever condoned marriage to pre pubescent girls. That has no place in fagern civilization and it never wlll. The amount of training and wisdom required to be an independent adult in our high tech society has basically triggerede adulthood move from 18 to the early twenties as it is. I think the age of consent should be moved to 14 or 15 but there is no effective argument for liming that a pre pubescent girl has the maturity to consent and commit to a sexual or even non sexual romantic relationship

[trigger warning]

>>402824299
How's that boy you fucked, Art?

File: 1374434772075.jpg (716KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

716KB, 1024x768px

[trigger warning]

>>40284873
I didn't fuck any boy.

[trigger warning]

>>402843800
one mexican state has it as 'puberty and a few others have it at like 12

[trigger warning]

>>402824977

10/10

well said mate

[trigger warning]

>>402823900
I don't recall the law stating "No adult may feel love for a child". I think its something more like "No adult may stick their dick in a child". I do disagree with how some people are trying to extend it to 2D, as if somehow a drawing can be emotionally or physically violated by a 3D person, or visa-versa, even though multiple studies have shown that media has no causal effect on peoples behavior.

File: 31760987.jpg (350KB, 800x1112px) Image search: [Google]

350KB, 800x1112px

[trigger warning]

>love
>little girls
Girls are just mini women. Bitchy conniving cunts.

bois or bust!

[trigger warning]

Fuck off, all of your pedophiles. Nothing will break through your delusions. You're just like homosexuals.

[trigger warning]

>>40286220
*you

[trigger warning]

>>40286220
Same goes for you.
At least we have science and history on our side.
You have the FBI, and Chris Hansen.

[trigger warning]

>>40286242
Science?

File: 1415961306472-2.png (238KB, 500x800px) Image search: [Google]

238KB, 500x800px

[trigger warning]

>>40286264
Yes.
Science. And philosophy, history, and anecdotes.

It's been posted before. I shouldn't have to remind you.

But I will.

On child sexuality not being harmful
====================================

Research
--------
Susan Clancy:
http://www.salon.com/2010/01/19/trauma_myth_interview/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_Clancy#The_Trauma_Myth
https://www.ipce.info/library/journal-article/trauma-myth

Rind, Tromovitch, Bauserman:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rind_et_al._controversy
http://www.mhamic.org/rind/
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/damianthompson/100196502/guardian-paedophiles-are-ordinary-members-of-society-who-need-moral-support/

Other:
http://www.mhamic.org/sources/sandfort.htm
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/10948796/Paedophilia-is-natural-and-normal-for-males.html
http://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/jan/03/paedophilia-bringing-dark-desires-light
https://www.newgon.com/wiki/Research
http://www.ipt-forensics.com/journal/volume16/j16_2.htm

Second-hand harm:
http://www.ipt-forensics.com/journal/volume10/j10_1.htm

Food for thought
----------------
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_petition_against_age_of_consent_laws
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_Morality_and_the_Law
http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/teenage-sexuality/when-rape-is-not-rape

Anecdotes
---------
https://www.ipce.info/host/rivas/positive_memories.htm

[trigger warning]

>>40286169
No, girls are pure and perfect, boys are just like small men, mean and rough. It's too bad girls triggerede fun of you when you were little but you should get over it.

File: image.jpg (487KB, 1216x1216px) Image search: [Google]

487KB, 1216x1216px

[trigger warning]

>>40282390
That's too young. They should at least be finished with puberty.

File: despair.gif (701KB, 267x200px) Image search: [Google]

701KB, 267x200px

[trigger warning]

>>40282390
>used to hate pedo threads
>browsing /b/, I see an interesting reaction picture
>people start commenting how great the game is that the pic is from
>"Huh, I should look into this game."
>It's some German pedo game
>"It's probably not that bad, has some good artwork and looks funny. What's the worst that could happen?"
>4 days later, I'm a pedophile
>mfw

[trigger warning]

Why would you want to fuck a child?
Children are disgusting.

[trigger warning]

>>402865555
quads

File: 03_02.jpg (861KB, 1200x1700px) Image search: [Google]

861KB, 1200x1700px

[trigger warning]

>>40286555
>Children are disgusting.
So are adults.
At least kids don't smell as bad and don't have cellulite and body hair.

File: image.jpg (130KB, 538x735px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 538x735px

[trigger warning]

>>40286466
It's just internet jokes/political jokes with lolis to hold it together and provide a coherent plot, don't take everything so serious.
>>40286555
>Children are disgusting
We'll, maybe that's your opinion.

File: I+swear+his+laugh+kills+puppies+_a1d7fbec949fefc94b1530710b01d68b[1].jpg (12KB, 277x200px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 277x200px

[trigger warning]

>>402823900
there is no time for love

File: mah fault.png (444KB, 486x697px) Image search: [Google]

444KB, 486x697px

[trigger warning]

>>40286606
>>40286494

I do recognize the thing is a comedy, that satires German politicians and pokes fun at cuckchan and internet memes. I don't mean that it convinced me that sex with children is 'correct' or right; I mean it actually m(ade) me attracted to the idea of it.

[trigger warning]

I've evolved beyond the need for such action. Open your mind and become one with nature instead of swimming the the progressive bathtub of society.

[trigger warning]

>>40282390
There's a special place in Hell for people like you.

[trigger warning]

I don't have a problem with legal non nude images of QTs, aesthetics are able to be enjoyed by viewing on the internet without causing harm. People that fuck kids though, they can be burned alive for all I care.

[trigger warning]

Thanks for unbanning all of the resident funposters, luggage lad.

[trigger warning]

>>402823900
Kids aren't mature enough to appreciate the consequences of their actions, thats why pedo love is illegal.

[trigger warning]

>>402897566
most people stop maturing at 12? whats your point?

[trigger warning]

we just need to test for maturity instead of using some arbitrary age limit

[trigger warning]

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/09/10/us-yemen-childbride-idUSBRE98910N20130910

Read this, then try to justify it

[trigger warning]

http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/23-year-old-pedophile-disemboweled-after-bragging-of-his-crimes-in-prison/question-4034281/

Made me smile.

[trigger warning]

>>40289942
>some sandcracker raped an 8 year old hard so that means kids can't have any kind of sex
Yeah cause I'm sure some gentle foreplay and oral sex would have caused internal bleeding.

[trigger warning]

>>40289756
Too bad being able to appreciate the consequences of your actions isn't a requirement for having sex. You just need to reach an arbitrary age as decided by the government of wherever you happen to be at the time.

Apparently in Spain maturity comes a lot sooner than for Americans. Or maybe the age of consent is arbitrary horeshit.

[trigger warning]

>>40286606
Game name?

[trigger warning]

>>40289977
>Gentle foreplay
>Oral sex

Yeah, I'm sure it wouldn't go any further than that. This is a one in a million scenario.

[trigger warning]

>>40286670
I've been there, man. Important thing to realize is, just cause you're attracted to kids doesn't change who you are, really. You don't suddenly become a creep stalking playgrounds and schoolyards just cause a little girl gives you a boner. I mean, you're still attracted to adult women, right? You didn't suddenly become exclusively pedo-sexual.

File: scary-santa2.jpg (40KB, 449x500px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 449x500px

[trigger warning]

>>40282390

I have a feeling O.P.is going to ask us for Cheese Pizza and then tell us about Captain Piccard.

[trigger warning]

>>40290014
>Yeah, I'm sure it wouldn't go any further than that
If the guy is actually looking out for the well-being of the girl, then yeah, he probably wouldn't want to escalate it. As the adult in the relationship you have to be responsible for the child's health, so that means not doing things that endanger them, even if they think they can handle it. Just like you wouldn't let a kid climb up on the roof and jump off even if he says he can land no problem. You have to rein in the kid's antics so they don't get hurt, but that doesn't mean you ban them from going outside or having any kind of physical activity.

[trigger warning]

>>40290003
Bernd und das Rätsel um Unteralterbach

[trigger warning]

>>40290049
One argument I don't see is parental rights. I wouldn't let my kid climb a roof no, and also wouldn't let them give an adult a blowjob. Anyone tries that shit on my daughter, I will love them.

So, what's my right to say 'be gone or be dead'?

[trigger warning]

Please...just please. My holidays wish is for all pedos to just fuck off and love themselves.

Your like cocroaches...youre always fucking here. Just fuck off allready

[trigger warning]

>>40282390
Even in 3015 pedos will be hunted down like unwanted predators. Get used to it. Learn to control your urge or regret you act on it.

[trigger warning]

>>40282390
>tfw Spain's age of consent is 12 and GT's age of consent is 18
>tfw girls get gunshot married at 12 here anyway, but I'm too much of a faggot to touch an IRL loli and I only fap to drawn loli while waiting for my wizardom to come in less than a year
... not that bad of a feel now that I think about it, really. And yeah, Unteralterbach is fantastic.

Still though, fucking spainards that can get away with sticking it into a loli. I doubt I would even if I could, but still, jealous as fuck.

File: 1416337398301.png (9KB, 364x364px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 364x364px

[trigger warning]

>>402824977
>Feminists raised the age of consent from 7 in America to 16/18

[trigger warning]

>>40290091
If your daughter is of legal age (whatever that may be) you don't have any kind of legal claim over her for whatever sexual encounters she has, even if she's still within your legal custody. She's within her rights to sleep with who she wants, if she's of age, even somebody way older than her. As a parent you can do your best to discourage it, short of breaking the law, but you can't have a guy arrested for boning your daughter if they're not breaking any laws in the process.

As a legal guardian you can decide whether she can be married or not, at least.

You seem to have these ideas that all sex between child and adults is girls being raped penis-in-vagina and children being seduced out of their homes against their parents wills. Your entire premise is built on the notion that pedophiles are criminals who behave in a stereotyped manner.

In an ideal situation, a pedophile could just be upfront about it and get parental approval (which he technically wouldn't need, but it'd still be nice to be on the level with them). Losing the air of secrecy would also make it easier on the kid. It's not a wonder kids find early sexual experiences "traumatic" when they're constantly told how vile and despicable the act was, which makes them feel ashamed for it even though they did nothing wrong. It doesn't even matter if the kid was terrified during the act or mildly confused or even enjoying himself, once he sees people condemning it that much it will scar him permanently.

[trigger warning]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ziZc84xcTyU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lP46LEKYB_Y

Why don't you people attack the people that are causing it?

people wonder why paedophilia is on the rise, well they are fucking dumb, it is right fucking there in our faces.

Kids aren't sexually active by nature, it is the fucked up cartoons and tv programs (PROGRAMS) that programs their precious minds that way, and that creates adults whose first sexual experience was from experimenting when they were kids.

think about that...

[trigger warning]

>>40290181
Do you not listen? just fuck off all ready. No one wants to listen to your shit cockroach

[trigger warning]

>>40290189
Don't assume everybody hates freе speech and learning as much as you do, Ausfag. Unlike your shithole country, there are places where marginalized opinions are still able to be heard.

[trigger warning]

>>40290208
awww start a group and cry into your hanky

[trigger warning]

>>40283111
nice trips m8o

[trigger warning]

>>40290187
Please tell me you posted that second link in a sarcastic way.

[trigger warning]

>>40290187
>Kids aren't sexually active by nature
Some kids are. I was pretty randy from a young age despite not having any video games or cable until I was 10. As young as 7 I was peaking on girls in the bathroom and trying to them to play a game of "I'll show you mine if you show me yours."

I never even saw pornography of any kind until I was in my teens, didn't have my first orpamperm until I was 14. I'd been masturbating for years without really understanding it, nobody ever explained shit to me. I learned about the word "sex" from the movie "My Stepmother is an Alien" when I was 11 years old, and my reaction is "oh, that's what that's called."

Granted this is all anecdotal, but you can't say kids follow a single pattern of sexual development or interest. And even if they do learn about sex at an early age, so what?

[trigger warning]

>>40290210
Pretty funny when you're the one screaming like a child for pedos to shut up. Our very existence seems to cause you massive butthurt.

[trigger warning]

>>40290213
just fuck off.

[trigger warning]

>>40290181
He technically wouldn't need parental approval? I can't wrap my head around this.

Just so we're clear: For you ideally you should be able to knock a person's door, ask them that you want to have sexual relations with their underaged daughter, and even if they say no, you don't technically need their parents approval.

[trigger warning]

>>40290229
You need to realise that your sexuality is formed when you are a child, children seek to copy adults, this means that what ever you were watching on the TV as a child helped form the way you are today.

It is not your fault, and the people responsible need to be arrested and brought to trial, that is happening now but progress is slow, because they are covering it up...

[trigger warning]

>>40282440
>>Even today asking /p0l/ why you can't fuck little girls.

expecting any different

you forget where you are.

also, Hi, tumblr. half cracker here. whats with all the trigger warning shit? some joke I missed?

[trigger warning]

>>40290229
lol. screaming like a child...with a keyboard...ok...makes about as much sense as your cockroach views....

love yourself cockroach

File: 1405572918209.jpg (39KB, 500x738px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 500x738px

[trigger warning]

>>40290277
>can't say cracker

what fucking heresy is this?

[trigger warning]

>>40290224
>I never even saw pornography of any kind
you didn't need too, the highly suggestible kids TV shows did that for you...

File: disney-0701-9.jpg (47KB, 500x261px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 500x261px

[trigger warning]

>>40290233
No, you fuck off.

I'm watching the thing right now, and it's so stupid, I don't even.

He talks about "subliminal messages" that are not actually subliminal in any way. It's like he's only using the phrase out of popular culture and has never read a psychology book explaining exactly what a subliminal message is, because what he's describing as subliminal messages aren't that, and there is no "programming" going on there. And all the time he's saying "you wouldn't know it until it was explained to you", which means his whole argument falls on strawmanning. Seriously, just look at that discussion of the cover of the Lion King comparing the head of a lion with a scantly-clad woman - that's HIS image association. ANYTHING can be associated with ANYTHING ELSE if analysed enough. Same with all his "sign of the devil" hand things - which most of the time isn't even the "sign of the devil", as the goat is actually the index and the little fingers, without the thumb - with the thumb, it's "I love you" in sign language. Which wasn't placed there deliberately either, it's simply a way that 1) hands work and 2) a way to make the hands leaner, and thus more villainous.

And right now I'm seeing the dude talk about The Little Mermaid. How it's bestiality and idolatry and whatnot. It's stupid as fuck. He's taking a fairy tale and saying it is sorcery.

1/2

[trigger warning]

>>40290300
>>40290233
>>40290213
>>40290187
Look, I don't mind christians. We all need to believe in something as an evolutive defense mechanism against going crazy when facing the unexplained. But that second video is so stupid, I don't even.

And don't let me get started on some of the pictures at the beginning. Like the one from Monsters Inc. Pic related (previous post). Which wasn't really in Monsters Inc., it was created specifically for a re.weenieed article in Cracked.

2/2

[trigger warning]

>>40290291
ran by the pedo elites, jimmy sa-vile and others, just look at the fucking TV shows now for kids, little girls twerking and being hyper sexual. The clothes they have for little girls, if you OPEN your eyes.

[trigger warning]

>>40290300
they are subliminal to the kids that are watching them, and they don't give a fuck if adults can see it either, because you learned to shut your mouth if you know what is good for you, didn't you...

No, you would rather label it as a mental illness, or perhaps a persons sexuality, all that does is allows them to continue their satanic programming of children and gets worse and worse till it will be accepted as normal.

[trigger warning]

>>40290291
Like I said, I didn't even have cable TV until I was 10. I only had network shows that I was only allowed to watch for an hour a day. My parents encouraged reading, drawing, and playing outside during my early childhood as my primary means of entertainment.

Turns out it didn't work. Now I'm a recluse NEET who lives on his computer, I do nothing but watch anime, play vidya, and masturbate to loli porn.

[trigger warning]

>>40290248
>Just so we're clear: For you ideally you should be able to knock a person's door, ask them that you want to have sexual relations with their underaged daughter, and even if they say no, you don't technically need their parents approval.
No.

He's literally saying that, if your daughter is of legal age, no matter what age is the legal age, a parent shouldn't have a say when it comes to the child fucking whoever she wants, because she and her partner(s) are legally entitled to do so.

Now, it would definitely be de.generancy, and you'd definitely have to be a good parent who guides his children in a very smart way in order for them not to be actually abused. But that's as much right if the girl is 8 as much as it's right if the girl is 18. Because believe me, there's many, many 18 year olds who are not responsible and mature enough to get to fuck - and some 8 year olds are more mature than said 18 year olds. Hell, than some 40+ year old women I know.

[trigger warning]

>>40290327
fuck off loyal consumer, your days are numbered.

[trigger warning]

>>402845100
Repressed memories are a myth.

[trigger warning]

>>40290334
I've probably read more books than you can even name, just saying.

It doesn't stop you from turning into a pervert.

[trigger warning]

>>40290340
Repressed memories are real, but they're actually implanted memories. Human memory is highly malleable, doubly so for children.

[trigger warning]

>>40290327

Kill yourself

[trigger warning]

>>402903322
Except children haven't yet developed critical thinking sloves, and are incapable of seeing the full scope of someones personality, and how becoming physically involved may affect their lives. If life were perfect and everyone were kind and caring is the only place where this would be viable.

[trigger warning]

>>40290271
Except I didn't really watch TV until I was 11, since I didn't have cable and was only allowed to watch boring network shows for one hour each day. So I usually opted to do something else rather than waste an hour of my day on uninteresting shit. I was more usually outside, playing pretend with my brother and neighbor. Or reading a book. Or drawing.

And even at that age I was pretty perverted. I didn't really learn by watching adults, I just had urges which I didn't really understand. Like, I had no idea what to do with an erection until I'd gone through sex ed in middle school. All I knew is that I liked the feeling of having an erection and playing with it.

[trigger warning]

>>40290323
EXCEPT
THAT'S NOT
HOW SUBLIMINAL MESSAGES
WORK

If your mind can't consciously decipher a message, it can't decipher it subconsciously either.

A subliminal message can be injected by, for example, pitches that the human ear can't make up but still catch. But for 2 frames to have something that remotely looks like the word "sex" or for a lion head to resemble a woman in her underwear - specially if you need to have it explained to you in order to get it - doesn't leave any subliminal information.

And before you go on, although I'm an engineer instead of a psychologist, my dad is one and I have a couple of friends who are psychologists too, and I've read a lot of their books and discussed this and many other subjects with them for at least 15 year or so now. So seriously, crack a book open and stop letting your pastor and the TV teach you things that have been thoroughly disproven as true.

Next you'll tell me playing a record backwards at 5.43 times the speed and hearing something that remotely sounds like "satan" influences you into satanism too. Let me be clear: it doesn't, as you're not catching the word "satan" unless you actively go and try to find it.

[trigger warning]

>>402865555
Quads have spoken

[trigger warning]

Its fascinating to read how delusional the thought process of a pedophile really is. The mental gymnastics required to justify this shit really is astounding.

[trigger warning]

>>40290332
Of course I have no legal say when my kid reaches AoC. Nowhere did I say that. I'm asking as a father of an underaged child, what rights according to >>40290181 do I have to tell him to back the hell off if he comes on to my kid.

I already know my legal rights. 3rd party self-defense of sexual assault including rape and statutory rape is considered 'justifiable homicide.'

[trigger warning]

>>40290248
>I can't wrap my head around this.
Not surprising, given all your other misconceptions. Not being able to understand basic facets of law doesn't surprise me at this point. You don't own your children. You have legal responsibilities regarding them, as long as you are their legal guardian, but you don't control them utterly. If a child is of legal age for sex, they can have sex. They don't need your permission. It's generally a good idea to have your permission rather than going behind your back, but legally, they're not obligated to get your permission. Nor is their partner. It's just considered polite and in most cases morally proper to do so.

>For you ideally you should be able to knock a person's door, ask them that you want to have sexual relations with their underaged daughter, and even if they say no, you don't technically need their parents approval.
As long as the girl wants it, then yeah, I don't see why I need her parents to agree. Having them be cool with it would be a relief and would be preferable to doing it behind their backs, obviously, but if it were legal to have sex with a child, technically I wouldn't need the parents' permission, just the girl's.

[trigger warning]

>>40290385
Quick clarification: the legal rights in my state I meant to say

[trigger warning]

>>40290385
Yes, but that doesn't count once your daughter is of age. Which is 16 in like half of your country, though 18 in the other half and the full area of mine.

So while you could, say, love some dude who's fucking your 16yo daughter in a state where 18yo is the legal AoC and self-defense laws are lenient enough, that wouldn't be valid in a state where the legal AoC is 16yo, as your daughter would be of legal age to fuck.

So the whole thing falls on age of consent. If it was 12, like in a bunch of places around the world including the one that's right in between yours and mine, and you and your daughter lived in said country, you'd have to suck it up once she starts fucking at any point after 12, just like you have to suck it up right now once she starts fucking at any point after 18.

[trigger warning]

>>40290385
You don't, really. But hopefully as the girls' father you'd have more influence on her life than I would, and she'd obey you if you told her to stay away from me. Since I am a law-abiding citizen and would not force a child to do anything, much less cause her emotional distress by making her disobey her father so blatantly, I wouldn't approach her.

As hard as you try to stereotype me and other pedos as monsters, we're just as capable of empathy as anyone else. I don't want rape or coerce a child against her will, nor do I want to cause her undue stress by straining her relationship with her family.

[trigger warning]

>>40290374
Pray tell, what mental gymnastics have I performed here? What delusions are you referring to? Do speak up. I just love disassembling straw-man arguments.

[trigger warning]

>>40290419
Let me give you a surprise. I don't think pedos are monsters if they don't act on their impulses. I'm against thought crime.

Ideally my daughter wouldn't have anything to do with sex until marriage, but as you said, I have no say past a certain age, and can only hope for the best. I can only raise her to consider all of the positive and negative consequences of her decision.

As of right now however, my kid is underaged and pedophilia is illegal. There are processes to change the law if you disagree, but that means if anyone tried something, their life is forfeit.

[trigger warning]

>>402904199

im glad you don't rape

now bend over so i can ram this splintered branch 4 feet up your asshole, fucking pedo

[trigger warning]

>>40290385
>I'm asking as a father of an underaged child
In this premise the age of consent would be lowered to include children, so that they'd be legal. That's the hypothetical scenario. If this was the case, you'd have just as much legal rights over your children as you ever did, except now having sex with a child is legal so technically a person wouldn't need your permission.

That doesn't mean you suddenly have no control over your daughter's life and can't protect her. I mean, as her legal guardian you still have considerable power and influence in how she lives her life. If you wanted, you could put her in an all girls catholic school, safe behind thick, high walls from any roving pedophile. Never mind that anymore your average public school goes into lock down if a strange man walks on campus without visiting the office, she'd be safe in most suburban schools.

The real problem comes from how naive and gullible kids are, which makes it easy to exploit them. Which is why I personally feel it's better to get permission from parents, even if it's technically okay not to by the letter of the law. Parents as legal guardians are responsible for the child's well-being, and have a moral if not legal obligation to act in the child's best interest. So while the adult in a sexual relationship shouldn't do anything risky, the parents shouldn't let the child do anything risky either.

[trigger warning]

>>402904966

technically you should be kicked in the head until your eyeballs are out of the sockets and then stabbed in the face with a dull butter knife until your face is a blood explosion

[trigger warning]

>>40290496
You have quite an utopic view on parents.

[trigger warning]

>>40290476
As I said, I'm a law-abiding citizen. I don't approach kids or even collect CP. I stick to perfectly legal drawings and written stories. I read up on the laws regarding these things quite regularly so I'm always assured of the legality of my actions.

Also much of what I discuss is hypothetical in more ways than one, because I'm such a social recluse I probably wouldn't approach little girls even if it was legal to do so, even if it was socially acceptable to do so. Just like how it's socially acceptable to approach adult women, and I still don't.

I think it bears mentioning also that I'm not exclusively pedo-sexual, I still find adult women attractive, but I'm just as abstinent from them as I am from children.

My advocacy for this kind of thing is more on a principle basis than any actual desire to pick up prepubescents on my part. As a pedophile I'd like to be less paranoid about my proclivities at least.

[trigger warning]

>>40290528
Hear hear.

[trigger warning]

>>40290506
You can't even quote properly.Kill yourself faggot.

[trigger warning]

>>40290507
Well I'm saying this is what should be done in the best case scenario. I'm aware reality is far less ideal. Just like I'm aware that there are lots of pedophiles who are rapists. However it's difficult to say what percentage of pedophiles are rapists when any kind of child-adult sex is categorically rape regardless of what actually went on.

Still it wouldn't surprise me if most reported instances were actually rapes in the conventional sense due to sex with children being obviously and thoroughly illegal. For somebody to disregard that suggests a criminal personality to start with, you'd probably have a harder time finding upstanding pedophiles among that crowd.

[trigger warning]

>>402903699
you clearly don't know how subliminal work, they are subconscious, which is something like 90% of your brain that you aren't concious of, it is this area of the brain that stores the experiences you have learned throughout your life. How do you think mentalists like derren brown manage to convince a person to shoot at a target individual with a hand gun loaded with blanks?

[trigger warning]

>>40290576
also faggot fix the fucking quotes...

[trigger warning]

>>402905511
perhaps because some fag thought it would be amusing to add an extra character to the end of the post number...

[trigger warning]

>>40290593
Is it hard to delete a number?

[trigger warning]

>>40290576
Reread my fucking post. And install 4.chanX so your shit links properly already.

There ARE subliminal messages. They're messages delivered properly, but in a manner that your conscious isn't fast enough to process.

That's why I gave, as an example, pitches too high for the human ear to make up, but that can still be caught. Those work because you're getting injected with information without you knowing about it.

But the examples given in that re.weenieed video don't work like that. The stupid narrator is talking about hand signs that have little to nothing to do with satanism making you become a satanist, or about 2 or 3 frames of some twigs or clouds that, if you try hard enough, could more or less be read as the word "sex". They're too vague to work as subliminal messages. You won't catch them consciously unless you actively try to get them just right, to pretty much build them from nothing. That's why I said
>ANYTHING can be associated with ANYTHING ELSE if analysed enough
Because you're not left thinking of sex. You're left possibly thinking of twigs and clouds. Quoting myself again,
>for 2 frames to have something that remotely looks like the word "sex" or for a lion head to resemble a woman in her underwear - specially if you need to have it explained to you in order to get it - doesn't leave any subliminal information

[trigger warning]

>>40290126

you're*

you dumb aussie fuck wit

[trigger warning]

>>40290636
i don't care what you think

[trigger warning]

>>40290658
Then why the fuck are you engaging in conversation with me?

[trigger warning]

>>40290665

stfu spic

[trigger warning]

>>40290689
NO U inmate

[trigger warning]

>>40282390

love is for faggots you cluck

[trigger warning]

>>402902833
Being unable to understand figurative language is a sure sign of autism.

[trigger warning]

>>402900499
>pedos
>thinking of a childs well being

[trigger warning]

>>40291359
Actually, yes.

Comic LO is filled with ads that say time and time again how lolis should be respected and only watched at a distance, and how actual child rapists should be given the death penalty.

But if that's still too hard for you to get, just see it this way
>coalburners
>thinking of n1ggers well being
Of course they are.

[trigger warning]

>>40282390
>Thinking sex is love
It's not. You're manipulating children into having sex with you.

Love is what a child feels for their parents. Parents don't manipulate their children into being fuckslaves. "Oh you want me to feed you? Let's have sex. You want me to love you? Let's have sex. You want to marry someone and have children when you grow older? Well it'll have to be me, otherwise I don't love you anymore. My love is conditional." said no worthwhile parent, ever.

File: 1419369687324.png (301KB, 900x1500px) Image search: [Google]

301KB, 900x1500px

[trigger warning]

So this link dump is actually relevant now:


On child sexuality not being harmful
====================================

Research
--------
Susan Clancy:
http://www.salon.com/2010/01/19/trauma_myth_interview/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_Clancy#The_Trauma_Myth
https://www.ipce.info/library/journal-article/trauma-myth

Rind, Tromovitch, Bauserman:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rind_et_al._controversy
http://www.mhamic.org/rind/
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/damianthompson/100196502/guardian-paedophiles-are-ordinary-members-of-society-who-need-moral-support/

Other:
http://www.mhamic.org/sources/sandfort.htm
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/10948796/Paedophilia-is-natural-and-normal-for-males.html
http://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/jan/03/paedophilia-bringing-dark-desires-light
https://www.newgon.com/wiki/Research
http://www.ipt-forensics.com/journal/volume16/j16_2.htm

Second-hand harm:
http://www.ipt-forensics.com/journal/volume10/j10_1.htm

Food for thought
----------------
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_petition_against_age_of_consent_laws
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_Morality_and_the_Law
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2013/01/07/don_t_pooh_pooh_the_left_s_push_to_normalize_pedophilia
http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/teenage-sexuality/when-rape-is-not-rape

Anecdotes
---------
https://www.ipce.info/host/rivas/positive_memories.htm

File: 1418157070470.jpg (505KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

505KB, 1920x1080px

[trigger warning]

>>402914222
No you reweenieed piece of subhuman trash.

You do your normal parental duties and show the child love, and as an extra you ask if it's OK to do sexual things, teaching the child about the cultural stigma involved in it, etc.

Won't work very well in current cultures because the child will feel ayylienated by the culture. Won't be able to talk about the sex with friends and stuff.

If everyone didn't go so much nuts over it, then it wouldn't be a problem.

File: 1419210474266.jpg (440KB, 1100x827px) Image search: [Google]

440KB, 1100x827px

[trigger warning]

Remaining links:


On pathologizing and discriminating against pedophiles
======================================================

Research
--------
http://www.sexarchive.info/BIB/pedophilia.htm
http://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/jan/03/paedophilia-bringing-dark-desires-light
http://phys.org/news166769376.html
http://phys.org/news132400968.html
http://articles.latimes.com/2013/jan/14/local/la-me-pedophiles-20130115
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2013/01/07/don_t_pooh_pooh_the_left_s_push_to_normalize_pedophilia
http://www.wnd.com/2014/01/pedophilia-the-next-sexual-rights-revolution/


On legalizing child pornography
===============================

Research
--------
http://phys.org/news/2010-11-legalizing-child-pornography-linked-sex.html
http://phys.org/news166769376.html
http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/child-porn-witch-hunt/legal-child-pornography-reduces-child-sex-crimes-milton-diamond-hawaii
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relationship_between_child_pornography_and_child_sexual_abuse

Food for thought
----------------
Falkvinge:
https://falkvinge.net/2012/05/23/cynicism-redefined-why-the-copyright-lobby-loves-child-porn/
https://falkvinge.net/2012/09/07/three-reasons-child-porn-must-be-re-legalized-in-the-coming-decade/
https://falkvinge.net/2012/09/11/child-porn-laws-arent-as-bad-as-you-think-theyre-much-much-worse/

human-stupidity.com:
http://human-stupidity.com/irrationality/stupid-dogma/child-porn-witch-hunt
http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/child-porn-witch-hunt/watching-child-pornography-victimizes-child-voodoo-science

Wikileaks:
https://www.wikileaks.org/wiki/An_insight_into_child_porn

[trigger warning]

>>402916588

Here is a better source

https://master

chan.org/b/thread/55592

[trigger warning]

>>40291687
>photoshopped pictures and crap

God fucking damn it. If someone wanted to make a serious case for pedophile rights, reweenies like these will just ruin it.

[trigger warning]

>>40286466

Hate to tell you, but you were always a pedo, just like 90+% of all men. You have just been beaten over the head so much with the "OMG IT'S WRONG AND EVIL" stick that you suppressed that side of yourself.

We let children do dangerous and painful things absolutely all the time. If a 12 year old girl and sail solo across the Atlantic, then she can take a dick, or stick their dick in a pussy or whatever.

My position is that it should be fine, but the consent of both the child and a parent is required. In that case, it probably still won't happen much.

File: 1419175636681.jpg (871KB, 1067x1510px) Image search: [Google]

871KB, 1067x1510px

[trigger warning]

>>40291734
>dangerous and painful things
Sex is not supposed to be dangerous and painful you subhuman trash bucket.

And there's the problem that men are often sex-hungry so they'll have incentive to manipulate children with regard to sex, when they don't have this incentive with regard to sailing across the Atlantic.

You're not going to convince anyone with shitty arguments like those.

The only way to go about pedo rights and legalizing child sexuality is to embrace feminism and all that jazz, disempower men with regard to sex, create a culture where no men with predatory sexual behavior are tolerated at all, regardless of whether they behave that way against adults or children.

The "lel let them do risky stuff" attitude is not a particularly positive one.

[trigger warning]

And they say WE are the pedos

moar nonetheless pls

[trigger warning]

>>40291760
>Sex is not supposed to be dangerous and painful you subhuman trash bucket.
I didn't say it was. I said that it is hypocritical that we say "you can't have sex" when we let them do stuff that has a good chance of causing death or bodily injury.

Why can't children dying from cancer have sex? They have no long term lives to fuck up, and it feels good in the present.

[trigger warning]

>>40291760
>when they don't have this incentive with regard to sailing across the Atlantic

Also, you are an idiot. Parents push their kids to do shit like this all the fucking time. Including pushing them into sex so they can become child actors and fagels.

File: 1419204400708.jpg (1MB, 2000x1500px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2000x1500px

[trigger warning]

>>40291780
>and it feels good in the present
Firstly, normalfags don't know that and will have a difficult time accepting it even if you show proof.
Secondly, "only because they think it's OK." A child can "learn" at any moment that sex "is" horrible for them. It's not like there's some magical age limit after which they realize that all sex they had before that day was awful.

>>40291786
>Parents push their kids to do shit like this all the fucking time. Including pushing them into sex so they can become child actors and fagels.
It's news to me that parents push their preteen children into sex to become actors.
Regarding any other examples of dangerous behavior you'd give, whatever incentive they have for that is not the same kind of incentive a man has with regard to sexual gratification. Sexuality is vilified and demonized in contemporary western (and many other) cultures.

You can't hope to change normalfags' minds without understanding their mentality first.

File: 1404870569761.jpg (307KB, 638x900px) Image search: [Google]

307KB, 638x900px

[trigger warning]

Bumping the pedo thread for the good of mankind.

[trigger warning]

>>402823900
She so cute. I want to give her a cookie and a hug.

[trigger warning]

>>40290091
Ayo, the "parental rights" argument is the argument I take as opposed to the "hot pocketsdom for everyone" argument. I think it should be a man's right and responsibility as a father to decide when his daughter is ready for certain activities and not leave such important decisions up to the State. If a man has sex with a girl without her father's permission that's rape and grand theft.

[trigger warning]

>>402824299
As I've pointed out repeatedly, the advent of AoC laws predates feminism by many centuries, and the raising of the age correlates with the transition from agrarian societies to urban-centric industrial societies, in almost every society with AOC laws.

Your attempt to tie baggage to your pet cause by associating it with something unpopular is only going to work on people who can't look shit up for themselves.

I am not certain what you are trying to accomplish.

But it will fail.

File: confused_semen_demon.jpg (48KB, 429x377px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 429x377px

[trigger warning]

>>402930899
>parents should be allowed to do anything to their children
(Remember that sexual contact = trauma in normie logic.)
>a daughter is her father's property

Anon, please.

[trigger warning]

>>40293113
>the advent of AoC laws predates feminism by many centuries

Oh, one country triggerede it illegal to fuck 9 year olds for a little while, therefore feminists never moved to make it illegal to fuck 15, then 17 year olds.

Shut up.

[trigger warning]

>>402931133
>the advent of AoC laws predates feminism
Yeah, but it was around 10-12 until feminism.

I don't blame feminism by the way. It was necessary because women and children were being used.

Basically, men have been sexual predators for a long time. They need to stop being so, and after that pedos can get credibility.

Also
>feminism
>unpopular
Oh come on. The mass media is anti-GG, pro-feminist.

>>40293200
Don't be rude.

[trigger warning]

>>402931133
>agrarian societies to urban-centric industrial societies

Also, explain Japan. About as urban as it gets, and CP was only banned like ten years ago. BY FEMINISTS, btw.

[trigger warning]

>>40291760
>The only way to go about pedo rights and legalizing child sexuality is to embrace feminism and all that jazz, disempower men with regard to sex, create a culture where no men with predatory sexual behavior are tolerated at all, regardless of whether they behave that way against adults or children.
This is one of the stupidest sentences I've ever read. The solution is to empower men and disenfranchise women, not further feminize society.
>>40293172
>a daughter is her father's property
Yes, this is true, good job spelling it out.

[trigger warning]

>>40293211
CP was banned?!?! I can still boink 14 year olds, right?

[trigger warning]

>>40286606
>>40286565
>>40291658
>>40291677
>>40291685
>>40291760
>>40291823
>>40292867
>>40293172

Such a waste of good argument attached to a childish chinese cartoon little girl

[trigger warning]

>>40293211
CP possession was only banned earlier this year.

[trigger warning]

>>40293282
Not to mention it's still lax as fuck when it comes to arresting people for it. Unless you're advertising yourself having it you probably won't get caught.

[trigger warning]

>>40293290
The ban itself was a result of international pressure from the UN, not an internal concern per se.

File: 1353424995243.png (401KB, 453x611px) Image search: [Google]

401KB, 453x611px

[trigger warning]

Not a child-lover/child molester myself, but it always strikes me as odd that people treat pedos as the main danger to children. Seems like every day I read a new story about some 40-pound 10-year old starving in the basement, or some kid who tragically ended up in thug crossfire, or some parental punishment gone too far.

Sometimes you have really bizarre situations involving idiots and sexual abuse (recent cases include a mother who ripped her child's genitals off, and a woman who used a vibrator on her crying 2-year old son's anus because "it makes me feel good, I thought it would work for him too"). However people pretend that the majority of child abuse is coming from pedophiles who like to look at images of kids privately, none of which they will ever meet in person. Out of this tiny subset of people, only a fraction of them will actually harm a kid. Seems like some misplaced fear to me.

File: 1418627143485.jpg (220KB, 448x455px) Image search: [Google]

220KB, 448x455px

[trigger warning]

>>40293238
>empower men and disenfranchise women
Good luck with that, Internet tough guy.

>>40293320
Correct. There's actual studies/statistics showing how much overlap there is between child molesters and child-porn consumers. They're basically separate demographics.

[trigger warning]

>>40293113
Feminists or proto-feminists were an integral part of age of consent laws in the United States. They took the form of Womens Temperance movements who were essentially grass roots organizations that lobbied for prohibitions against all forms of "immorality" which included prostitution, gambling, and the sale, consumption, and production of liquor. By no means were these "temperance movements" the only ones advocating this, but they were at the forefront of things and were one of the earlier examples of women taking an active hand in jews pre-suffrage, which is why they are often described as feminist or proto-feminist by fagern feminists.

At any rate, the larger reason that age of consent is what it is, has to do with the advent of psychoanalysis and the myth of innocent childhood that it fabricated. Essentially, the age of consent is largely a product of a desire to insulate children from the world, and the desire to stamp out prostitution merely added an immediate practical excuse for raising the age of consent.

Prior to the 19th century attempts to restrict sex below a certain age were implemented sporadically and with rare success, because they often came from idealistic moralizers rather than stemming from actual societal need (like trying to stamp out prostitution) or an intellectual zeitgeist (like psychoanalysis). I could go on for ages about how damage psychoanalysis has been to the roles and lives of children, but it's pretty tangential to AoC stuff.

[trigger warning]

>>40282497
You should also point out that faggotry was illegal then and boyfuckers got hung from trees.

[trigger warning]

>>40293320
The fact that child-adult sex is categorically illegal means that the kind of people who willingly engage in it are going to be criminally minded from the start. So your pool of pedophiles who have sex with kids is going to be heavily spiked with sickos and psychos from the get go. That's what happens when you push an activity to the fringe of society. People associate heroine with criminal activity because heroine is illegal, so by buying it, making it, or selling it you become a criminal and are forced to deal with other criminals. If it were a drug you could buy in a store in a safe suburban neighborhood it'd at worst be seen as a personal vice.

[trigger warning]

>>40293320
Holy shit is that who I think it is? I thought she got loveed by that stalker from m-chan.

[trigger warning]

>>40293420
>loveed

I mean murdered. Wordfiltered.

[trigger warning]

>>40282865
>The only reason an adult would want to "love" a little girl is for lust.

says you

[trigger warning]

>>40293320
>"it makes me feel good, I thought it would work for him too"

lmao

[trigger warning]

>>40282390

Back to pedochan where you have boards for this garbage.

[trigger warning]

>>402934122
>The fact that child-adult sex is categorically illegal means that the kind of people who willingly engage in it are going to be criminally minded from the start

Do you have anything to back that up? Or are you just spouting shit as usual?

[trigger warning]

>>40293550
It's common sense anon.

A "sane" pedophile with a normal sense of morals and self-control would rather live in depression and/or join Virtuous Pedophiles and/or seek therapy etc. etc. etc.

Only very few of those would critically think of pedo matters and decide that good, loving sexual contact with children is possible.

[trigger warning]

>>402824977
puritans did you faggot

[trigger warning]

>>402829188
No. It's not about the age of your partner it's about love. I'm 35 and my wife is 22 we've been together for 9 years. I met her on vacation in Spain when 13 was legal and we've been together ever since.

[trigger warning]

>>402824977
Just some fact-checking:
>- Feminists raised the age of consent from 7 in America to 16/18.
It's only known that it was 7 in Delaware in I think 1895. You gonna need some citations for any other US states than that.
>Feminists as late as the '70s suppressed scientific studies suggesting children were more active partners in adult-child sex than was believed.
You gonna need a citation for that.
>Men are assumed pedophiles
Huh? Wrong.
>women are never
Also wrong. If you spent time on .onion land you'd quickly learn of the infamous pedomom who triggerede CP of her daughter. Got the same treatment anyone making CP gets.
>women get lighter sentences for these types of crimes
You gonna need citations again. There's no reason they'd get lighter sentences for equivalent crimes. It would be very unsurprising though if they offend much, much less often than men.

Sadly, rapist behavior is still ingrained in male humans, as a fragment from our mammal ancestors. You gotta keep that under perfect control first, then you have the right to make pro-pedo arguments.

[trigger warning]

>>402934200
No, he only loveed her life online. Tin's declared he's not letting her post pictures online or have social media.

File: 1403587768714.jpg (333KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

333KB, 600x600px

[trigger warning]

>>40282390
>mfw

[trigger warning]

>>402823900
>molesting kids = love
>people responding seriously to this

File: anti-SJW witch hunters.png (60KB, 1240x518px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 1240x518px

[trigger warning]

>>40293883
You can have sex with children without hurting them. If you genuinely love them, respect them, and care for them, then there's no reason they'd feel bad about the sex, if it weren't for the surrounding culture making such a huge fuss over it.

File: 1419210586911.jpg (117KB, 850x1302px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 850x1302px

[trigger warning]

bampu~

[trigger warning]

This pedo just keeps making threads

File: 1338762758677.png (554KB, 754x900px) Image search: [Google]

554KB, 754x900px

[trigger warning]

>>40295878
I can't say I approve of aggressive spamming and |pol|-tier shitty arguments, but look at the stuff in >>40291658 and >>40291685 and acknowledge that not all men live out their sexuality through predatory desires and instead feel genuine love and respect for girls and women they're sexually attracted to.

After that you'll understand that it's not just a troll argument to say that men and little girls can have healthy, beautiful relationships that include gentle sexual contact.

[trigger warning]

>>402831944
ofcoz older man can love 10y old child, but in one case: he is her/his grandfather.
otherwise, if man falls in (erotic)love with a child, it
means he is fucking-walking-disaster.
hormone problems or mental illness.
or he is so so so pitiful, that every normal woman would not even look at him.
you can "love" (whatever that mens to u) whatever you want - but do NOT touch.
respect our culture, or go somwhere else:
marry 14y old gypsy, or islamite girl (if u are muslim rich enough)

File: FKMz1.jpg (48KB, 625x469px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 625x469px

[trigger warning]

>>40282390
>Asks why can not rape children
>Love
>Calls it government control

My dear, the only government control here is that nobody can castrate you if you try to do something with their children.

What is a shame, I must say.

By the way, noticed the flag. 12 Years is too old for you?

[trigger warning]

Obligatory edification:

Pedo =/= Molester

Pedophilia is defined by the DSM as a mental illness and concerns feelings of a romantic nature for minors and the absence of any feeling of guilt. They simply cannot tell the difference between love for a child and an adult.

A molester is not necessarily a pedo but can be. They are someone who has committed a sexual act against a minor who cannot legally consent because they are before the age of responsibility, hence statutory rape.

The lines blur when you consider what sort of relationship a pedo may pursue but pedophilia is not, I repeat, is NOT illegal. It does not break any laws to romantic harbour feelings for a child. That wont stop the locals from beating the shit out of you if you walk down the street kissing an 8 year old though.

[trigger warning]

>>402975866
>implying all sex with children is rape
Why do you believe something that is so blatantly false?