So the TL;DR is, I've been looking around online for statistics on which percentage of races adopt other races and cannot really find anything.
Here's the story:
So I was listening to NPR about this black lady who was adopted by white people. Basically the thesis of her argument was "I never felt like I got the kind of black 'cultural' upbringing and felt marginalized by my adoptive parents." Sure, she tried to hedge that message with lots of "of course I loved them," and "they just saw me as their daughter," but the message was pretty clear, her being raised by white people somehow diminished her "blackness" and when she was around a majority black population she felt "seen" (she of course related a handful of unrelated racist events in her life to support her feelings).
This made me wonder, if being adopted by a white family and raised by white parents, in a white community, diminished her black racial identity, would the same happen to white kids adopted and raised by blacks in black communities.
And then I started wondering: exactly how many black kids, percentage wise, are adopted by fully white families, and (more importantly) vice versa.
Aside from the (overblown) articles of a black celebrity adopting white kids, and a few anecdotal stories, I could not really find hard numbers on this. I wonder if /pol/ can work it's collective magic on this.
Ultimately, I just feel like, if you're going to bash your adoptive parents for not giving you the 'black' experience you wanted (but who simultaneously saved you from an obvious life of poverty) maybe you should look at your community and ask why they aren't doing more?
>>133128019
Self bump since I think this is a criminally under-analyzed topic.
>>133128019
Whites raised by blacks turn out great. Pic related.
>>133128734
Great movie
Do you miss the early-mid 2000s? Before smartphones, social media, Tumblr, Recession, Big Bang Theory, etc exploded circa 2007
>>133127993
that show was nice, and yes, i miss the golden age of isla- i mean cartoon network
>>133127993
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_aXkLWnqso
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MF0d960xJlE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_HJwih2CiIA&list=PLW1JoioHtnVcAW1miu3do62ES0OopYDpY&index=4
I really miss this.
>>133127993
YES.
>re-dubbed clips of Lord of The Rings were super popular and everyone made their own profanity-ridden "parodies" by firing up Windows Movie Maker and slapping a shitty recording of them swearing and talking nonsense (often sped up with Windows Sound Recorder) onto a random scene from an illegally downloaded Hollywood film
The T*rkish Ottoman Empire was among the first nation to decriminalize homosexuality, in 1858
>[source]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tanzimat
The T*rkish Sufi "mysticism" cult included the "sema" ceremony, in which Sufis would sit in a circle and contemplate "beautiful boys". The rite was also known as "boy gazing".
>[source]: http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/male-sexual-quirks-among-the-ottomans.aspx?pageID=238&nID=78968&NewsCatID=438
The Ottoman T*rk Army, even during the First World War, was infamous for homosexual rape, with officers and even common soldiers routinely raping the young, the good-looking, and the weak among their ranks, and even prostituting their comrades out to other soldiers
>[source]: “Off the Straight Path: Illicit Sex, Law, and Community in Ottoman Aleppo" (Syracuse, 2008), Elyse Semerdjian
The famous Turkish proverb "women for breeding, boys for pleasure, and melons for sheer delight" speaks for itself.
>[source]: "Islam and Homosexuality: Volume I", pg 33. (University of Western Sydney, 2009), Ed. Samar Habib.
Is sodomy a T*rkish tradition?
>>133127767
Turks were the original butt pirates.
Haven't you seen Lawrence Of Arabia?
Do T*rks today know that their homosexual urges are genetic and cultural, and do they just consider it a natural and normal part of life?
If any T*rkroaches are reading, I would value your input.
>>133128048
modern turkish society is very homophobic. faggotary is less common in turkey than europe.
"Sally Hemings was just 14 years old when Thomas Jefferson began using her for sex. Hemings was just 16 years old when she had her first child by him. This continued, unabated, for decades. It's not love. It's not romantic. It's sexual assault and sexual abuse. The children that were produced from this were also forced into slavery. Again, that's not love or kindness — it's an unspeakable horror."
"When a man has sex with a human being he owns, consent is forced, no matter the circumstance. This is doubly true of any enslaved African living at Monticello — where whippings and punishments have been well-documented.
Hemings, and others enslaved there, had no sincere choice but to serve those who claimed ownership over them or suffer the consequences. This fundamental principle is the bedrock of slavery. It does not exist without it."
"Thomas Jefferson was not some victim of time because he just happened to be born in an era in which people were confused as to whether slavery was evil.
He knew good and well it was as evil then as it would be today, but he deliberately and purposefully maintained the system of slavery not only in his own life, but also for the nation.
As President of the United States, he did absolutely nothing to slow slavery down. As the physical owner of 600 human beings who openly admitted he knew what he was doing was evil, he made a daily decision to be evil."
http://archive.is/6xvn0
>>133127760
all of our founding fathers were either in favor of returning freed slaves to africa or keeping them enslaved. nobody wanted to have them integrate into society, because they understood the negro problem we would face today if left unchecked
>>133127760
> Not getting prime negress pussy when you can do whatever the fuck you want
Judging people who have power is the ultimate cuck move. Morality is a spook made up by those without power.
>No Sources
>Author's last name literally KANG
>Refuses to talk about black-on black violence
Okay. Definitely not biased at all.
>>133127603
Yes
Wether or not they should be accepted as moral equals is another question
>>133127603
Women shouldn't be allowed to vote, they generally aren't inclined to vote in a way that is healthy for a society
However I would settle for just land owners including female land owners
>>133127603
Nah, it should be
Receive any form of welfare -> can't vote
Apologize
>>132314907
dont get whats going on in pictures, also kys.
nobody cares about your twitter nobody thread, you make this website worse.
/thread
>>132314907
A fat nosy bitch is snooping around at other peoples' phones and found out someone is bitching that her fat is melting into their seat. It's donglegate all over again
>>132314907
>harassment policy
You're right, what's the policy of harassing a guy while he's having a private conversation
https://qz.com/1014031/japan-has-a-labor-crisis-that-refugees-could-fix-if-only-its-government-would-let-them/
>Japan is drowning in a surplus of jobs, and while that may sound like the pinnacle of capitalist aspirations, it’s actually a huge economic problem.
>By some estimates, Japan needs an average of 609,000 immigrants per year for nearly 50 years to reestablish its peak workforce of the 1990s bubble years. If, hypothetically, Japan were to suddenly throw its doors open and take in every one of the 170,000 refugees the UN anticipates resettling this year, that gap would not even be close to plugged.
>“You can save the lives of 30 or 40 people at a refugee camp overseas by using the same amount of money as accepting one refugee in Japan,” said Saburo Takizawa, a former UNHCR representative in Japan.
>Prime minister Abe’s adviser Masahiko Shibayama said that Japan has “an allergy toward the word ‘immigration,’” and, yes, even in a place with a job glut, there are fears that immigrants will ‘steal’ jobs. “People are worried about public security. They worry that foreign workers would eat up Japanese jobs,” he said.
>On the outskirts of Tokyo, a neighborhood locally dubbed “Warabistan” has cropped up to accommodate the Kurdish asylum seekers who staff construction sites and convenience stores. Government-funded road projects and Subaru cars plants have both benefitted from asylum seekers’ work. In 2015, asylum seekers were even found removing radioactive contamination at Fukushima—under the false pretense that they would be given visas in return.
>>133198789
Please archive or screenshot
https://archive.is/8yPh4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BNrxq9DubQ8
>>133198789
LET. THEM. IN.
>kill american soldier
>canadian government gives you millions
Why bother?
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/ottawa-to-offer-omar-khadr-apology-compensation-package/article35538745/
This stings just as much as the first time it was posted
What does /pol/ think of Donald J Trump's presidency so far?
>>133127381
I think he is doing a good job and a good example for the western world. Liberals are a disease.
>>133127578
No, the reality is right wingers like you are disease. Thank god we have the cure, good old fashioned progessivism
>>133127381
He is good but not as charismatic as Obama. He seems like he has a chip on his shoulders and always tries to prove himself superior with features and such.
I don't know how people cannot stand by this guy's philosophy. yeah I know, it's fucking 4 hours long but there are some good shit being talked in this. So I'm posting this here. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xrBCsLsSD2E
TL;DW
the guy's explaining the modern cancer of 2017 that is culture war and identity politics.
These hacks know nothing of the Kekistani state of mind
>>132314704
lol. summer.
>>132314704
http://www.strawpoll.me/13351651
Fuck Drumpf and fuck white peoplr
>>132314689
Wow I didn't know petrol huffers browsed /pol/
>tfw it's 12:03 CST and there is STILL no sticky celebrating the birthday of the greatest country the world has or will ever know
Get in here, faggots, and show some respect to the country that brings you the board that you shitpost on for 16+ hours a day, every day.
Why would any self proclaimed right winger like this man?
>Anti capitalism
>Pro high taxes
>Anti Laissez Faire / Free Markets
>Anti property rights
Lol. Even if he won WW2, Germany would've collapsed under its own weight. (At least after they ran out of stuff to steal.)
>>133127367
>Nationalizing the international bank and printing debt free currency is stealing.
Jefferson would be dissapointed in you.
>>133127667
Jefferson is wrong on this issue. Private companies are less corruptible than a government with unlimited funds and legal immunity.
>>133128181
Not when it comes to banks. That is the only corporation that shouldn't be held in private hands. Everything else I can agree free enterprise and what not. But as he said a foreign country controlling your bank can compel a country to do anythig because the nation becomes indebted to them.
Why does everyone take the stability and comfort of Western society for granted? Do they not realize it can be taken away in an instant?
Can any minarchists here tell me their arguments as to why they're minarchists? I'm interested in the topic
>>133127346
bumping
>>133127346
I just don't want the government constantly breathing down my neck and forcing me to behave a certain way and walk on eggshells desu senpai
>>133127346
I wouldn't describe myself as a Minarchist but many familiar w/ Libertarianism would and I'm OK w/ that.
In reality my Political views are constantly changing as I'm exposed to new info: 8 years ago I helped a Socialist get elected to Federal Parliament, today I'm a "Minarchrist" things change.
To answer your question w/o going into details, I'm a minarchist because I believe a state w/o a central functioning body wouldn't work out as predicted by some of our most thoughtful of Libertarians have said. I think a Central Governing Body that legislates based upon a minimalist constitution based on the NAP would be the next most moral form of Government after pure Anarchistic Libertariansism but would actually have a shot at being successful.