Archived threads in /pol/ - Politically Incorrect - 7585. page

File: 1498675883174m.jpg (110KB, 505x1024px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 505x1024px

Use it wisely.

>>132858099
thanks anon. any spare proofs to post?

File: bella and the bulldogs.jpg (108KB, 699x644px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 699x644px

I also once debated a pedophile online and his points were pretty much the EXACT SAME "sex does no harm, your worldview is dogmatic" BULLSHIT, he posted studies which show that there are many cases of pedophilia with no harmful consequences (which again to be fair I could not disprove conclusively) AND he shifted the burden of proof like the first guy
I'm 100% certain now that the argument for legalizing pedophilia will be the exact same #NOTALL bullshit and shifting the (((burden of proof))) on conservatives

So i'm having a dilemma here, what is the problem with "muh feelings"? SO WHAT if we have a dogmatic worldview? The thing is it's worked JUST FINE for us so far so why should we change our dogmas? For hedonism?
And how can we debate the degenerates if they have the upper hand with (((burden of proof)))??


TLDR
>(((they))) will shift the burden of proof on us to show CONCLUSIVELY why degeneracy is bad and shouldn't be allowed (which is IMPOSSIBLE)
>dogmatic ideology (Christian morality) beats (((rational))) thinking which leads to a slippery slope ending with pedophilia and beastiality and other forms of degeneracy
>dogmatic "muh feelings" worldview isn't bad and it JUST WORKS so there's no reason to change it (only hedonists want to change it)

2/2

white man nedd bbc

>>132858027
save us poland

>>132857724
Anderson Vanderbilt? He's a CIA nigger.

Massive faggot, met him before in 2004. He believes in not having an opinion on any news story. That belief clearly changed since hillary got shut down. He's also a Rockefeller, so fuck him

>>132857724
Ex military????

Hahaha hahaha hahaha holy fuck. Ty for the kek anon. Not being mean at you, just hilarious that Anderson could be mistaken for someone of standing who has served in the forces. All princess Vanderbilt here would be good for in the military is polishing cocks.

It's in your nature, goy. Just give in to the temptation, and you'll feel so much better.

File: macronwife.jpg (57KB, 500x468px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 500x468px

>>132857445
yes, his wife drives him

>>132857325
I feel that /pol/ is quite emotionally invested in what they believe and what they do. That's fine to do, however it opens the doors for emotions to take centre stage in what they do rather than thinking logically and with reason.

I also feel that people aren't skeptical enough regarding things posted here. A lot of the information posted is in infographics, and even though a source adds credibility, it still should be evaluated to see if it's actually legit. People should be skeptics rather than believers. I'm personally fine if people disagree, and they're free to continue down their path of discovery in regards to truth.

>tfw no one cares

>>132857120
Aww... CIA... you were so close.

Closer than anyone ever before.....

Congratulations.

What else would they protest about?
They're the most privileged people on earth.

Extremely advanced propaganda programs. "Propaganda" doesn't even begin to describe the psychological population control mechanisms that are at work in this society.

>>132856858
It's a sign of the times. When you don't have anything important to bitch about, you bitch about mundane shit.

>>132856856
Google is your friend.

>>132856856
I'll bump

>>132856856
http://www.lmgtfy.com/?q=net+neutrality

>>132856679

I would have put more options on that survey, but I reached the limit.

>>132856679
Democrats, the majority of jews, niggers, spics and all other degenerates would get taken with them.

I went with Jews, but the argument for Democrats is a compelling one...

>been no