Archived threads in /pol/ - Politically Incorrect - 656. page

File: IMG_3060.png (979KB, 750x1334px) Image search: [Google]

979KB, 750x1334px

>Free healthcare
>Free housing
>Universal basic income
>Strength in Diversity
How can we get more migrants to migrate to Canada?

File: ubi.jpg (18KB, 418x294px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 418x294px

It seems like there's a recent rise of these people, or are they all Soros shills?

File: 6381.jpg (272KB, 1372x900px) Image search: [Google]

272KB, 1372x900px

Genghis Frog action figure has a relationship to Pepe. I think that it bears mentioning.

File: IberIdentirarians.png (43KB, 863x659px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 863x659px

Where are they?

File: Screen Shot 2017-09-02 at 11.52.03 AM.png (817KB, 1346x1054px) Image search: [Google]

817KB, 1346x1054px

Look at this shit:
>Trump is expected to announce his decision on the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program on Tuesday. It grants temporary work permits and protection from deportation to nearly 800,000 immigrants.

>Most of the Republicans challenging Trump are targets of Democrats seeking to win back the House next year and represent districts that will help determine the House majority.

>The lawmakers include Rep. Carlos Curbelo (R-Fla.), who has filed amendments to an upcoming spending package to keep DACA intact, as well as GOP Reps. Dan Donovan (N.Y.), David Valadao (Calif.), Jeff Denham (Calif.), Don Bacon (Neb.), Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (Fla.), Martha McSally (Ariz.), Scott Taylor (Va.), Mario Diaz-Balart (Fla.), Dave Reichert (Wash.), Dan Newhouse (Wash.) and John Faso (N.Y.).

>The most striking move comes from Rep. Mike Coffman (R-Colo.), who announced he will try to force a vote on his bill extending DACA work permits by starting a discharge petition — a rare move for a member of the House majority party.

>Coffman would need to get all 194 House Democrats to sign his discharge petition in addition to at least 23 GOP colleagues.

>“If the Democrats hold firm, I believe I’ll have enough Republican votes to pass 218,” Coffman said.

THESE ARE YOUR REPRESENTATIVES, WHITE MEN. THEY ARE OPENLY WORKING WITH DEMOCRATS TO SPEND YOUR TAX MONEY ON ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS INSTEAD OF YOU. WAKE. THE. FUCK. UP.

http://thehill.com/business-a-lobbying/348934-some-gop-lawmakers-are-battling-trump-and-their-party-on-daca

File: Pepe Newspaper.png (184KB, 483x470px) Image search: [Google]

184KB, 483x470px

Thinking about things are going, as society continues to fracture, the environment collapses and the world crumbles, what if we're too late /pol/? What if the point of no return on these issues was passed a long time ago?

With the way demographics are going in the developed world, by 2040 it's going to resemble Yugoslavia with nukes, while everywhere else will be worse off with most of it being inhospitable.

File: bless.jpg (127KB, 916x960px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 916x960px

why haven't you become muslim /pol/?

File: 1504362118001.jpg (104KB, 689x741px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 689x741px

Giving every adult in the United States a $1,000 cash handout per month would grow the economy by $2.5 trillion by 2025, according to a new study on universal basic income.

The report was released in August by the left-leaning Roosevelt Institute. Roosevelt research director Marshall Steinbaum, Michalis Nikiforos at Bard College's Levy Institute, and Gennaro Zezza at the University of Cassino and Southern Lazio in Italy co-authored the study.

The study made economic forecasts for three proposals: a full universal basic income in which every adult gets $1,000 a month ($12,000 a year), a partial basic income in which every adult gets $500 a month ($6,000 a year), and a child allowance in which parents get $250 a month ($3,000 a year).

The larger the universal basic income, the greater the benefit to the economy, according to the report.

A $1,000 cash handout to all adults would grow the economy by 12.56 percent after eight years, the study finds. Current Congressional Budget Office estimates put the GDP at $19.8 trillion. The cash handout would therefore increase the GDP by $2.48 trillion. (Vox first did this extrapolation in their coverage of the report, and Steinbaum confirmed the accuracy of the extrapolation to CNBC Make It by email.)

The $250 allowance would grow the GDP by 0.79 percent and a $500-a-month payment would grow the GDP by 6.5 percent.

"THE LARGER THE UNIVERSAL BASIC INCOME, THE GREATER THE BENEFIT TO THE ECONOMY, ACCORDING TO THE REPORT."
These estimates are based on a universal basic income paid for by increasing the federal deficit. As part of the study, the researchers also calculated the effect to the economy of paying for the cash handouts by increasing taxes. In that case, there would be no net benefit to the economy, the report finds.

File: tumblr_ouyeycAArp1r9wa2qo1_540.jpg (78KB, 540x728px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 540x728px

Thoughts?

File: maxresdefault (1).jpg (182KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

182KB, 1920x1080px

Should lesbians be euthanized? Gay men can at least work jobs. Women are generally absolutely useless for everything except for one thing: giving birth to children. Lesbians won't even do that, so what's the point of keeping them alive?

File: 1484322513469.jpg (186KB, 854x833px) Image search: [Google]

186KB, 854x833px

>/pol/ isn't satir-

a bet all of you would pussy out in real life like this loser

File: 1501004020469.jpg (80KB, 387x387px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 387x387px

Need it to make a point.

File: yoh.jpg (94KB, 775x767px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 775x767px

why aren't you muslim yet /pol/?

File: the_brothers_bogdanoff_the_story_of_the_monstrous_transformation_video.jpg (109KB, 1140x640px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 1140x640px

What is the whole deal behind the bogdanoff brothers are? Like who are they anyway? Can someone give me a rundown?

Are they on our side?

File: 1438041793948.png (113KB, 399x536px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 399x536px

>labor population drop rapidly
>GDP is not growing for two decades.(other countries experienced real GDP growth)
>there are two answer
>feminism, promote more woman and use their ability to make Japan great again. Japanese woman is oppressed by Japanese man as well as rest of world's woman, so by using their power. Japan can be great
>immigrants, as you know, diversity is strength. enrichment from immigrants is priceless and it is needed especially in homogeneous country like Japan

which one should Japan pick up? both?