Well would you look at that
I don't get it
>>135842138
>cockninjastudios
It's a porn. You know, when an Aussie points a gun at you but it's okay because you're an emu.
>>135841106
That's what rage would look like if she had a huge hook nose
Now that the dust has settled, can we agree that anyone posting with anything except their geographic location is a filthy redditor and should be IP banned from all boards?
obvious shill thread.
>redditor doesn't remember /pol/ before geographic flags
typical
Yes, was a horrible decision.
Um sweeties, we took over your master plan.
>>136588275
>Immigrants are OK
>But you need to get out of Zimbabwe and South Africa
90 seconds with google doesn't show this existing. In any case the free market will fix it.
When will you quit the coffee jew. After 1 week being coffee free I wake up well rested, have more energy and sleep more soundly.
Quit the coffee Jew and live free of its shackles.
Kushner is the jew in the white house trying to broker peace. The subvertive Israeli kike agents don't want that to happen.
Fuck Mike Cernovich.
Fuck Jack Posobiec.
Fuck Laura Loomer.
and Fuck all other subversive Israel worshipping KIKES.
Fuck palestine. No alliance between Whites and mudshits. You chose the left 40 years ago, that was the mistake. Enjoy being the new jews being genocided by jewd
>>135841201
Jews aren't white you subversive kike
There won't be peace between Israel and Fakestine
In light of jewtubes new flagging system I propose we highlight and strike specific targets in order to maximise effectiveness. Mass flagging of every video we view whilst useful as chaff will eventually be ironed out but tweaks to the algorithm. We need to press the advantage now, we need to strike hard and we need to strike with surgical skill.
List YT channels below to hit that will hurt our opposition the most and cause maximum salt
False flagging?
So just like flag the 1 million+ subscriber YouTuber's so they can notice?
>>135840894
YT new terms of service states that content/context no longer matters, only the number of flags does. They've basically stated that they are no longer bothering to check, just going by what the "community" deems as hate speech.
If everything is subjective then what's the problem, give the commies the red flag they so dearly want
>>135841076
flag large and small, as long as we're precise we should have an effect. That's assuming (((they))) haven't already skewed the algorithm but even then it'll provide confirmation and we can adapt our approach
so currently the USA is demographically something like,
>56% white
>20% mestizo
>12%black
>6% asian
>6% other
would this country really be that much worse if the average american reflected this countries demographics genetically? that is to say, if we were all mixed race in similar percentages. i think we would be in a far better place than we are now. no racial tension or identity politics. a homogeneous society where we are all brothers.
I think whites need to be above a certain percentage to maintain the US as a developed country. Not sure exactly what that percentage is but if it goes below that then it will turn into Brazil 2
>>135840803
Even if you all race mix, there are more mestizos coming from the south. You'll end up having 20% white dna.
The 20% are concentrated in southern California, southern Texas and to a lesser extent southern Florida. Any other time you see them is in a ghetto part of a big city or they are mowing lawns or doing construction work and actually mind their buisness. I'm not saying it's OK I'm just saying the reality of what what I see.
In all my life I've have never heard anyone ever suggest the political significance of Christ's crucifixion in a political context . I refer to the historical story, as a man in Roman who was crucified for speaking out against the Jews. He openly condemn Jewish leaders for all there worldly practices, and preached spiritual principles as the basis for religion . This was at a time when people actually faced threat of crucifixion for dissidence. He turned a symbol of fear (the cross) into a symbol of faith. This is a serious question to all that identify with Christianity. Why have you dismissed the cross as the symbol of faith to overcome this difficult political times? Crucifixion really did happen. Christianity really did mark a revolution against this kind of political tyranny, did it not?
The expression "He died for our sins" was born from the "act of love by sacrifice". Therefore, the significance of crucifixion actually means redemption which gave us the notion of "do what's right because it's the right thing to do"
In another words, to save yourself means unironically give yourself to the truth (The absolute act of spirituality). And this is very hard, because we're self-centered... or sinners under the christian theology.
>>135842961
As politely as I can say it, you didn't answer my questions. I didn't ask about a theological question about Christ's resurrection. I was asking if as a Christian do you not considered the context of what Jesus preached against, and the crime for which he was crucified as significant. I think people fail to consider the fear and political oppression that stood before man at the time of Jesus preaching. If one does not consider significant that Jesus was crucified for dissidence and preaching that which was forbidden by the Jewish elites, then so be it. I'm asking if any Christian thinkers see it otherwise?
All things considered, the crucifix becoming the symbol of the dominant religion of the Roman Empire was one of the goddamningest unlikely things that has ever happened in history.
Are Christians the ultimate dindu nothing of history?
Always going on and on about how the "evil communists/atheists/Jews/secularists/revolutionaries/Muslims" killed those poor and surely innocent christians, while at the same, always downplaying the severity of any violence committed by christians
There's:
-the Persecution of the Paulicians
-the Albigensian Crusade
-the Bosnian Crusade
-the Fourth Crusade/sack of Zara and Constantinople and the other endless atrocities and sacking committed by crusaders
-the Hussite Wars
-the German Peasants' War
-the Schmalkadic War
-the Thirty-Years War
-the Eighty-Years War
-the (French) Wars of Religion
-the Inquisition
-the Beeldenstorm
There are other examples that aren't 'events', per se, but well known: for example, ultra-reactionary clergy in Spain funding (for example, Bishop Juan Soldevilla y Romero) strike-breakers or even death-squads to terrorize lower classes, the well-known corruption of the Catholic Church since at least the Middle Ages, evangelicals donating funds to fundamentalist Christian leaders in Africa that simply cause more suffering for africans, and so on. And then Christians will complain that somebody tried to reduce the influence of their religious either completely or somewhat.
With a track record like theirs, I'd find it hard to disagree that Christianity (and religion in general) needs to be abolished.
Any parents out there?
How many of you are "happy" that teen vogue wrote about anal sex? Because according to the Huffington Post you should be.
http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_59765b0de4b0940189700bf1
>one media outlet publishes an article on a subject
>other media outlet publishes an article on the article telling you how to feel about it
>pol posts a response to the response about how I should feel about it
Learn how to be a man and just read the original material and feel however the fuck you want. Disregard people who don't like how you feel.
Not doing this is what makes the SJWs seem significant.
>>135840757
>lets get mad about a sex blogger for HuffPo getting mad about a christfag blogger getting mad at Teen Vogue
Let it go, OP. Let the butthurt out. End the cycle.
Epic Games is pushing more useless diversity in the new game Fortnite. Can we put an end to this farcical PC shit already?
>>136587146
'ey wher da white men at
>>136587146
wheres the nigger?
Southerner visiting family in one of the last remaining white enclaves in the five boroughs of NYC. Don't give up the cities. AMA.
>>135840683
Staten Island?
>>135840683
Stay there please
>>135840683
Do we share those glorious Italian genes, brother?
>tfw don't think real Nazis would accept me, would probably killed me.
>I won't claim to be a nazi anymore
>tfw still can't stand and hate jews with all my bean
It's hard when you believe in something so much but they don't support any of your ideals. I wish I was in 117 AD Rome, They accepted far right jew hating homos like me.
ITT: Ernst Rohm
>>135840630
You don't need an ideology to hate the evil things Jews do.
>>135840740
He's my favorite nazi, but like him he got killed by hitler for being gay.
Post ending in 1776 determines where the 2nd Civil War kicks off
>Los Angeles
OP's star-spangled cuckshed
D.C.
Apparently fighting terrorism is bad lads
https://archive.fo/qz2Ms
>WALEED Aly has been branded “unhinged” after writing a New York Times article critical of Australia’s policies on immigration and terrorism.
>Right wing commentator and author Gerard Henderson accused Aly of spreading “fallacies” about Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull’s initiatives to ward off potential attacks on Australia.
>In the article, Aly labels Turnbull as “extremely weak” and slams his plan to create a super ministry to combat terrorism, the actual threat of which had been “over-hyped”.
>“I’ve had a look at Waleed Aly’s piece, and for Dr Aly to say that Malcolm Turnbull has debased immigration in Australia to an American and international audience, is completely false,” Henderson said on Tuesday’s edition of The Bolt Report.
>“The idea that the prime minister, because he renames a department is debasing immigration, is just a total fallacy.
>“(It’s) demeaning of the country. From a man who holds a doctorate of philosophy and teaches students at Monash University and has a number of programs on the ABC and Channel 10, this is sort of unhinged commentary.”
>In his article, Aly said multiculturalism used to be celebrated but was now considered a “threat to be managed’.
>“Every now and then you get the impression that Australia is desperate to be under grave threat,” he wrote.
>Last week, Mr Turnbull announced the creation of a super ministry at a dramatic press conference against a back drop of military equipment and gasmask wearing soldiers.
>“It was a shocking yet predictable moment because it seemed like a sudden escalation for Mr Turnbull who was once a critic of Mr Abbott’s tendency to over-hype the threat of terrorism,” Aly wrote.
>“Predictable because in so much of the world the appearance of being tough on terrorism has become the most common political currency.
>>135840482
>“Mr. Turnbull’s plan is to merge the intelligence agency, the federal police and the immigration department into a single bureau headed by the current immigration minister, Peter Dutton. This takes a sizable chunk of responsibility from the attorney general, although that position (encouragingly) retains an oversight role over the security services in the new agency.”
>Aly said Mr Turnbull was blindly following a British model when the terror threat in both countries remains starkly different.
>He said the “British approach” may not work here “because Australia faces a different kind of terrorist threat. And Australian authorities already have a strong record of arresting terrorists and of disrupting locally planned plots.
>“No Australian terrorist attacks have been mass casualty incidents, not one has been the work of a sophisticated network, and all have used crude weaponry such as knives and guns rather than advanced bombs. There is no Australian equivalent of the 2005 coordinated suicide attacks on the London Tube and buses or the more recent Manchester attack.”
>The piece follows raids on several properties across Sydney over the weekend and the arrests of a number of men over an alleged Islamist-inspired plot to bring down a commercial airliner.
>One of the four men arrested earlier this week was released without charge on Tuesday night.
>Two of those arrested at the weekend, including spray painter Khaled Merhi, are related to Australian-born Islamic State fighter Ahmed Merhi, sources told The Daily Telegraph.
>>135840482
fucking racist americans
Why is he put forward so much on here? What's so special about him? Does he make any new or unique points or insights about reality or anything? Is he extremely charismatic or something?
He explains things at the level that a 5 year old could understand it.
He believes this is where his audience hangs out. He thinks because we have neomodernists here we'll forget he spent the last decade redefining reality for female psychology students.
He's controlled opposition, that's why.
>>135840368
I've never even watched him but do feel this weird urge to clean my room