Archived threads in /pol/ - Politically Incorrect - 413. page

>>139415833
QRS11

>>139415833
Israeli kikes.

Cia operatives

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/aug/26/stormfront-internets-longest-running-white-suprema/

>>139416686
Who cares? It's another victory.

I live in the first world, so naturally I'm a civic nationalist.

>>140236710
ethno nationalist. because i want my people to continue to exist. and not become a minority.

btw its civic.

File: curtain mum.jpg (34KB, 590x393px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 590x393px

bump

File: billbo.jpg (44KB, 400x252px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 400x252px

>>139415577
>George's proposal enables us to lower taxes on labor without raising taxes on capital. Indeed, it lets us lower taxes on both labor and capital at once, and without reducing public revenues.

> Georgist tax policy reconciles equity and efficiency. Taxing land is progressive because the ownership of land is so highly concentrated among the most wealthy,'8 and because the tax may not be shifted. It is efficient because it is neutral among rival land-use options: the tax is fixed, regardless of land use. This is one favourable point on which many modern economists actually agree, although they keep struggling against it
> Georgist tax policy contains urban sprawl, and its heavy associated costs, without overriding market decisions or consumer preferences, simply by making the market work better. land values are the product of demand for location; they are marked by continuity in space. That shows quite simply that people demand compact settlement and centrality. A well-oiled land market will give it to them.

File: marxandfriedmanonthesamepage.jpg (61KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 640x480px

>>139415669
> Georgist tax policy creates jobs without inflation, and without deficits. "Fiscal stimulus," in the shallow modern usage, is a euphemism for running deficits, often with funny money. George's proposed land tax might be called, rather, "true fiscal stimulus". It stimulates demand for labor by promoting employment; it precludes inflation as the labor produces goods to match the new demand. It precludes deficits because it raises revenue. That is its peculiar reconciliatory genius: it stimulates private work and investment in the very process of raising revenue. It is the only tax of any serious revenue potential that does not bear down on and suppress production and exchange. As I have noted, George's fiscal policy takes two problems and composes them into one solution.

> George's land tax lets a polity attract people and capital en masse, without diluting its resource base. This is by virtue of synergy, the ultimate rationale for Chamber-of-Commerce boosterism. Urban economists like William Alonso have illustrated the power of such synergy by showing that bigger cities have more land value per head than smaller ones. (Land value is the resource base of a city.) Urbanists like Jane Jacobs and Holly Whyte have written on the intimate details of how this works on the streets. Julian Simon (The Ultimate Resource) philosophizes on the power of creative thought generated when people associate freely and closely in large numbers. Henry George made the same points in 1879

File: rigtwinglpidiots.jpg (41KB, 754x382px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 754x382px

>>139415776
>Georgist policies encourage the conservation of ecology and environment while also making jobs, by abating sprawl. It is a matter of focusing human activity on the good lands, thus meeting demands there and relieving the pressure to invade lands that are now wild and marginal for human needs. Sprawl in the urban environment is the kind most publicized, but there is analogous sprawl in agriculture, forestry, mining, recreation and other land uses and industries.

>Georgist policies strengthen public revenues while in the same process promoting economy in government. Anti-governmentalists often identify any tax policy with public extravagance. Georgist tax policy, on the contrary, saves public funds in many ways. By facilitating the creation of jobs it lowers welfare costs, unemployment compensation, doles, aid to families with dependent children and all that. It lowers jail and police costs, and all the enormous private expenditures, precautions, and deprivations now taken to guard against theft and other crime. Idle hands are not just wasted, they steal and destroy

There are also other countries that might fall. Iran, arabian countries, some african countries,... but those are relatively small and don't hold the potential to disturb the world order.

Russia though is different. They are already in a state where they are dissatisfied with the world order, because it is not working for them. While every other big actor is growing, expanding and developing, Russia is not. Now add to that that Russia might face a real existential crisis due to the electric car imploding oil prices, and you end up with the most dangerous scenario for the 21st century.

Russia has a huge nuclear arsenal and the second most powerful military in the world. It is also in a geographic position where it could invade western europe realtively easily. So what is going to happen, when 10 years from now Tesla cars took off, 20% of the global cars are already electric, and the oil price is below 5$ a barrel? The russian economy will look like Venezuela's right now, or like Libya's shortly before civil war broke out. So what is Putin, whom I assume will still be in power 10 years from now, do in that situation? Will he try to use Russia's only threat, it's military and nuclear might, to secure Russia's position in the world by trying to invade europe, or will he just accept that Russia is fading into irrelevancy, and potentially civil war?

Also, what if the Kremlin is already anticipating these developments, and they have decided to take action now. What if things like Brexit, the election of Trump, the "sudden" leaps in north korean ICMB technologies are all due to Russia trying to end a world order, that is already not working for them, and that is threatening to fully destroy it? They could try to lure in america into a big war in Korea, hoping it will bankrupt the USA and further divide the NATO.

>>140236607
>>140236608
>being afraid of electric cars
Are you scared of being turned straight by accident, OP?

>>140236607
Musk is a small, irrelevant player in the electric cars market. The traditional car manufacturers will usher the electric cars age in.

>>139415515
Nobody here is white nationalist you moron. That's the issue with you leftypol retards. you actually believe white nationalism is anything but a CIA psy op.

Bump
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ENyZ6YpBMEw

File: truth.jpg (110KB, 999x400px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 999x400px

Just be good to yourself, anon and strive for self-improvement. It's the only way. Clean up our diet, start working out, learn how to grown your own non-Jewed healthy food, learn a trade, start reading more, meditate, write, go hiking and camping often. The ultimate redpill is that of self-improvement and self-sustainability. Strive for that.

Anybody have a clue?

>>139415229
He's a worthless piece of shit that's what he meant. I hope your police or millitary over there shoots looters.

>>139415229

it mean your a newfag that doesnt remember any past lootcrews.

>>140236453
$14.88

>>140236593
FPBP

Minimum wage laws are socialist, there should be no such law

>>139415192

>>"okay honey how about we take a nice one for grandma?"

>>139415192
Since when does graduating high school make you intelligent?

>>139415192
nah

>>140236218
Poor quality bait. Z U C C is the cancer ruining humanity.

>>140236218
kys

Another Rothchild???? Are people crazy.

File: 1502890887933.jpg (30KB, 316x202px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 316x202px

>>139415177
When nothing happens you will still be a faggot.

>>139415852
>nothing happens
It's already happening retard

continue to plug your fat american sausage fingers into your ears though

you fuckin idiots really fuck up the world for everyone else

>>139415177
Oh so accepting the science of climate change mean I must accept the retarded economics of a carbon tax or carbon credits otherwise I am being unscientific?
What about "fuck off"?

Angola é nossa!

File: You srs?.png (386KB, 667x670px) Image search: [Google]

386KB, 667x670px

>>139415136
>why has this board become cancer
>*checks flag*

>>139415368
if i dont use that everything i say will be ill be shouted down

>>139415827
at least pick a different ideology