Dont they have any sense of pride or respect for themselves?
bullying is a very natural way of promoting proper social traits
How will he ever recover?
(No, seriously, he is definitely finished this time.)
>>137485002
who is greg baldwin?
>>137485068
VA for aku
>>137485002
Headline: 'Greg Baldwin just destroyed Trump with one epic Tweet'
Young dumb college kid from the suburbs heading off next week, I'm wondering if /pol/ can help me build a less shitty life.
Reading lists? Lifestyle/habit changes? Hobbies? Etc?
How do Iron Pill the hell out of my life?
I'm a bi-sexual male, I feel attracted to both men and women physically and emotionally and I've had good relationships with both genders and have had satisfying sexual relationships with both genders, yet I hold rather far right views and would agree that homosexuality at its root is degenerate. I think bi-sexuality should be treated differently though because bi-sexual men can have loving fulfilling relationships with women both physically and emotionally and start families, while every now and then going out and indulging with the same sex. All throughout history this has been happening and even some of the great intellectuals/forefathers of western civilization have had bi-sexual tendencies. What does /pol/ think? Is it still degenerate?
You sound like a complete faggot to me
>>137484927
You're worse than outright fags or straight people. You're incapable of any true friendships since your unhinged sexual desires will aim at anything.
>>137485477
This goy!!!
Welcome to /rcg/!
This is a general for the discussion of all things relating to radical centrism
Welcome: Radical centrists and people open to radical centrist thought
Not welcome: Right-wingers, left-wingers, communists, fascists, Nazis, SJWs, etc
LINKS:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radical_centrism
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centrism
www.centristproject.org
www.amazon.co.uk/Centrist-Manifesto-Charles-Wheelan-x/dp/0393346870
www.uscentrist.org
www.mensa.org
http://www.pewresearch.org/
https://www.aeaweb.org/journals/aer
http://www.investopedia.com/
http://www.econlib.org/library/Columns/y2010/Sumnerneoliberalism.html
NOTABLE RADICAL CENTRISTS:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Washington
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jane_Jacobs
https://en.wikipedia.org/Barack_Obama
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_de_Gaulle
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emmanuel_Macron
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Maynard_Keynes
no love?
Reporting in
E M P I R I C A L
E V I D E N C E
>>137485097
You are not alone boyo.
Pol: 1
Liberals : -1
https://neoabsolutism.wordpress.com/2017/08/14/an-autopsy-of-charlottesville/
>Charlottesville was as close to a controlled social science experiment as you will likely ever get. On the one hand you had right wing protesters, and on the other you had left wing protesters. What happened? It seems rather pointless repeating this, but I will do so anyway. The right wing protesters acting within the confines of law, behaving peacefully, and exercising rights officially granted by the US government were subject to a state of emergency decree from the governor and shut down. As far as it appears, the decree declared that all protests should be removed. This didn’t happen. Instead, the left wing protesters who showed up and were prepared and organised for violence were not disbursed. Violence ensued culminating with a car being rammed into a crowd of anti-fa resulting in one death. Universal condemnation of the right was the result.
>The take away from the above events from the mainstream right and alt-right has been boringly predictable. The usual bland platitudes and calls for everyone to lay their balls on a chopping block have flowed. Some of the more ridiculous criticisms include complaints of bad optics, complaints of unfairness from the police, and claims that political violence is somehow wrong and should be dissociated from. Generally it’s a confused mess.
>>137484851
>The central problem here is that the political theory that everyone is working from is radically wrong and people are paying the price in blood. We can start with the role of protest in the political eco-sphere and the effect of popular conceptions of protests. Our current political system has come into effect with protests. From its very beginning the liberal system has been one long procession of protests and it is so ingrained that everyone takes these protests as being genuine causes for social changes, yet there is a problem with this common belief, this problem is that there has never been a successful protest which was not being used by someone already in a position of power. If you are going to use a protest, which is a political tool, a weapon, it is imperative you understand how it works and when to use it. The principle is no different to being proficient in firearm usage – knowing where the safety is, how to hold it, how to stand etc.
>Now to break down a protest simply you have to do a number of things, you need numbers obviously which requires a network, you also need promotion. In addition, you need organisation. You need to plan where it will be, what time, and what the theme of the protest is. In addition, you will need to provide logistics. Transport, water, signs, food, security, and so on. The Charlottesville protest seems to have ticked all these boxes well. Now finally, and most importantly, you need a patron within the power structure who will provide cover while you piss in the face of his or her political enemies. In public. For everyone to see. If you don’t have this, then you are the one who is going to be the public spectacle, and a counter protest will be sent in by power actors so that they can use you to set an example against their enemies. Politics is about violence and degradation. Either you beat your enemy for all to see so the hierarchy is clear, or they beat you.
>>137484959
>As we can see, the Charlottesville protest lacked this final piece of the puzzle. Worse, it didn’t even demonstrate a good audition for any power actors who may find them useful. Among the more egregious failures was a lack of centralised messaging. If something goes wrong, like a car ploughing into a crowd, the narrative should be obvious and every one should get on the right page quickly. At least demonstrate discipline. If the car incident was accidental – it was the local government, left wing, and protester’s fault and they should be forced to apologise for this tragedy and take steps to implement policy to assuage further anger from the protesters. If it was on purpose – it was the local government, left wing, and protester’s fault and they should be forced to apologise for this tragedy and take steps to implement policy to assuage further anger from the protesters. If you don’t know at all what happened – it was the local government, left wing, and protester’s fault and they should be forced to apologise for this tragedy and take steps to implement policy to assuage further anger from the protesters. I’m sure you get the idea.
>Having the ability to demonstrate some discipline and ability to rally when and where needed will be useful to someone in power at sometime. That is your role as a protester. You are not the cause of spontaneous change. You don’t set off a chain reaction in a population of rational individuals as is central to liberal theory (left and right, all modern theory is liberal.) What you do is provide a threat and exude power to give a patron in power the appearance of legitimacy. Our current system is built on popular legitimacy. Any crack in this is a justification for a segment of the elite to use it to gain more power. Again, you are a gun, not the man holding the gun.
>>137485056
>A brief example of this mechanism laid bare can be seen from any example of the Civil Rights Era. Take Little Rock Nine for example. Here a group of nine black students enrolled in High School following the Supreme Court ruling in the absurd Brown V Board of Eduaction (1954) case. Here we have a strange situation and one symptomatic of the US at this point in history. The local state governance was in constant conflict with the Federal Government which along with Foundations was on a mission to reshape the US. The black students were enrolled by the NAACP, which was and still is a North East anglo/ jewish liberal entity maintained by foundation money and the enrolment was completed under the protection of the 101st Airborne Division.
>This case can be viewed from two angles. The first is the common one where these students enrolled without prompting, and the protests created a ripple effect through society which transformed rational individuals spontaneously with the radiance of their moral righteousness. This is the model that the Charlotesville protestors work on. The other view is that various centers of power in the US were in chronic conflict and the NAACP engineered a protest backed by federal government to impose their position and attack their enemies. The protests then being a setup as all successful protests are, thereby undermining the moral claims of the event.
Madison went on air today and competed the alt right, white supremist and neo nazi and kkk.
https://mobile.twitter.com/RadioMadison?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor
>>137484831
*denounced
Fucking auto correct
>>137485127
Too fucking late. How the fuck is anyone supposed to know what you're on about retard?
-
das racist
>>137484741
delete this now
HAIL OUR JEWISH OVERLORDS
an anon from SA posted something interesting earlier.
The politics here in the USA are becoming like SA, the ghost of white supremacy is paraded around whenever the government and its leftists need a way to take the heat off their failings.
It got me thinking, how can we redirect the attention towards them? When have there been successful governments like the USA, SA, other white nations that were brown themselves? When has a nation been basically conservative to point to it and say: here's a perfectly good government like the conservatives of our country without the spectre of white supremacy to hide your own ineptitude.
China?
South Korea?
Japan?
What is the form and function of these places and others that can show them they're grasping at straws, and what about non-colonial lefty countries that can't form a functioning government?
You fucking idiots. You thought Trump was your friend, but you got played by the shit american political system. He was never a true ally. You were convenient supporters and will now be discarded. Good Night Alt-Right.
Is this what you want /pol/? more dead fat chicks? Let me tell you something if you keep murdering fat chicks you are going to turn every redneck in America against your dumb ass, and trust me partner, that's not something you want pal.
>>137484684
post the gif where she jiggles faggot
>>137484684
Shut the fuck up, carpetbagger LARPer.
>>137485001
I don't have it. Where's the source footage? i want to examine it for uhhh....research. Let me tell yew something though. if I ever catch the yellow bellied nascar wannabe that did this I'll make his ass deader than Dale Erinheart Jr.
>escalating domestic unrest and talks of civil war
>rising tensions with NK and lil Kim has gone into hiding
>solar eclipse coming, cutting down the middle of the nation and dividing it
The end is near isn't it ?
Sent to all media outlets covering Richard Spencer's press conference