guys what do you think about this camera?

>>3149064

It's shit.

>>3149064
it's microdick cuck-turds trash, faggot. now gtfo of /p/ and now kys now

>>3149107
it's apsc you turbonigger, gtfo of my board

Number of mirrors*(1/crop factor)^2=how good the camera is

>inb4 some cuck claims you can't have a negative crop factor

>>3149115
The greentext should have said
>crop factor below 1
Anyway, here are some results of the formula:
Fuji aps-c 0 stars
Fuji GFX 0 stars
Sony A9 0 stars
Nikon d850 *
Pentax 67 ****
>Seems legit

File: x100-hybrid-viewfinder-1.jpg (78KB, 600x459px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 600x459px

>>3149123
>Fuji aps-c 0 stars
Try again.

>>3149124
Fair enough, pellicles count as half a mirror
>x100, x-pro 0.223 stars
>A99 half a star

man this thread is cancer.

It's a box. a box with a sensor in it. it's fine. happy?

>>3149066
>hasn't used it

>>3149107
>>3149115
Retards

Wew

>>3149064
chink shit.
anyway, no tilty screen, no buy.

>>3149164
Fucking this. Engineering had one goddamned job and they fucked it up.

Now if I want to buy an rf style body with a tilt screen it's got to be a sony. Why even live.

>inb4 panatwattery.

>>3149170
They can't seem to produce a light camera that has a mic in AND a 180 degree flippy screen. That's just totally fucked up as lots of people like to vlog as well as shoot the occasional still image.

i've never had a flippy screen why should i care for it i'd still get uncomfortable for that one shot

>>3149170
>>3149164
>tilt screen
kys faggots

>>3149064
meh

>>3149454
tilt screens is actually useful you twat.
when i use a mini tripod and set it on the ground or shoot chest height like haslelblood.

File: screen.jpg (560KB, 2399x1800px) Image search: [Google]

560KB, 2399x1800px

>>3149454
Tilt screens are pro now.

Because guess what? they are incredible useful.

I definitely agree that tilt screen are a pro feature. Any camera that even thinks itself decent must have a viewfinder and tilt screen for the best creative flexibility. Eye-level shooting isnt the be-all-end-all

>>3149586
I'm so sorry to hear about your lack of knees, anon. What caused this affliction? Birth or accident?

>>3149587
You actually believe that just bending your knees will give you the fullest extent of a low angle shot? Have you ever gone outside and taken actual pictures?

>>3149592
You actually believe no one took ground-level photos before the invention of the screen, let alone the flip screen?

You have a butt too. You can sit on it. It's padded. Portable chair. Neat, huh Morty?

Haven't used it, idk

Been shooting an X-E2 for many years.

I really miss having a tilt screen.

I do need an upgrade eventually but I'll likely go for X-T20 or something instead.

>>3149642
x-e2 is still ok unless you really have money sitting on you waiting to be spent or need some 4k video, otherwise wait for x-t30 or something.

>>3149064
It's probably a lot better than my X-E1 (which is my beater camera) and a bit worse than my X-T2.

I like bringing the X-E1 everywhere though, and wouldn't mind as much if it drops/breaks/gets bumped a lot... and you can get it for nearly free with a lens, and then re-sell the lens.
Might eventually upgrade the X-E1 to an E2 once they hit a similar same price point.

>>3149780
xe1 is shit though.
the live view shits itself when the lights goes a little down.