Realistically, what are the advantages of this piece of shit?
>Expensive (a few hundred dollars off of being able to buy a FF camera)
>Fixed lens
>Dust magnet which means you'll have to throw away your expensive camera since it's impossible to clean
>No viewfinder
>Shit in low light
>Pics at 1600 iso+ look like shit
Why would anybody buy this over a DSLR/Mirrorless camera?
Why not just buy a top of the range APSC size camera and throw an 18mm lens on it. Tada, you now have a Ricoh GR II that is probably sharper and actually works in low light and doesn't shit itself the moment a piece of dust blows into it.
Only advantage it has is >muh stealth which is nothing.
Fuck off retard.
>>3148109
Fuck off tripfag retard
>>3148111
Sick retort retard.
I don't justify myself to moranic morans.
>>3148104
has sex appeal
is m43 shitposting mutating or something?
>>3148259
I fear this isn't even a final form
I fear all gearfaggots that leave their containment thread(s) will soon start making separate threads just for their specific autistic screeching about manufacturer x over y, lens s over t, format, model, sensor size, number if dials, filters, everything, everything you can sort on when you buy a camera online, there will be an autistic screeching thread for it
It won't be long til we see bickering about tripods and bags
>>3148263
well i don't think there will be any final form
Hey faggots, give me an apsc mirroless + prime lens combo that is quite """pocketable""". a6000 + pancake 20 2.8 is not as sharp as the gr lens. smegma 19 2.8 is quite long desu.
>>3148265
Ricoh GR
>>3148104
S O N Y
O
N
Y
Their RX100V killed the GR.
>>3148278
lol. smaller sensor, worse ergonomics, more expensive.
>>3148289
>smaller sensor
yet still much better
>>3148278
Nope.
>>3148104
>Only advantage it has is >muh stealth which is nothing
it's a compact, stupid, meaning it was made to be compact
>>3148298
At what?
>>3148298
kek
sonyfags are really this delusional
>>3148265
Fuji x70
>>3149286
did it fall in the ocean?
>>3148278
Spoken like a true armchair fagtographer.
The rx100 is a clever toy. Fucker takes 10 seconds to wake up and extend and can only be shot full auto with EC.
It is fine for still shit.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model DSC-RX100M2 Camera Software Capture One 9 Macintosh Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.8 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 28 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Exposure Time 1/640 sec F-Number f/4.5 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 160 Lens Aperture f/4.5 Brightness 9.4 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 10.40 mm Image Width 2048 Image Height 1365 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Soft Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
>>3149289
Just Sony tears, senpai
>>3148104
>Why would anybody buy this over a DSLR/Mirrorless camera?
Fits in your pocket.
(and no, MILC's don't fit in your pocket with a lens attached).
>>3148289
>smaller sensor
Not him but the smaller sensor is compensated by the faster lens.
It is expensive, yes, but it also has an electronic viewfinder and very good video capability which IMO justifies the extra cost.
I do agree on ergonomics: they are utter shit.