Guys?
THE SX-70 WAS MADE IN 1972 OH BOY I'M BEYOND HYPED FOR WHATEVER THIS IS
>>3147087
If it was ten bucks a pack like they used to be it would be nice.
Otherwise, they can fuck off.
>>3147093
$10 in 1972 isn't the same as $10 now tho
>>3147097
10 bucks is the psychological limit that Fuji is selling their Instax packs for, with further discounts to 9 or 8 bucks if you buy in bulk. They have to compete with that.
Huuuuh. Clean your fridge doors /p/.
Prepare for disappointment.
>>3147092
The long awaited update, Hemorrhoid
>>3147087
Its a digital polaroid camera with replaceable lenses.
sx-70, 600, and spectra remake that shoots instax square.
or maybe they realized fujifilm is making a shit ton of money on instant film alone and they decided to jump back in to making their own instant film.
>>3147292
The holding company that bought them got the patents or just the name?
If this is real then impossible project is dead.
>>3147097
It cost $10 in 2005, yungin
its a digital medium format back that outputs polaroid prints.
didn't impossible buy majority shares a couple months ago?
>The Impossible Project online store will be closed from September 10th to September 13th. They are probably replacing some labels and logos.
Well, looks like all they're doing is re-branding the Impossible film to "Polaroid" just so they can say that Polaroid is making "Polaroid" film once more. It'll still be the same garbage prices and garbage "hide in darkness for 30 minutes" chemicals.
Definitely nothing new in the way of camera gear.
>>3147087
Digital version of SX-70 in the vein of Holga Digital.
Calling it now.
>thought was canon or nikon
>its polaroid
lmao /yawn
>>3147618
#justdigicuckthings
>>3147422
But the value changed, idioto
>>3147291
>Its a digital polaroid camera with replaceable lenses.
Man, I was really excited about it, but I'm guessing it'll turn out to be this. It'll be something like a 4/3 camera with built in Zink printer, probably.