Will Canon ever release a EOS film body again?

Why would they?

>>3145798
because there is a film boom going on and the probably want to make money.

>>3145801
>there is a film boom
kek

The film boom is about slr:s that cost 30$. A new one would be like 1200$.

>>3145809
>>3145797
Basically,

What are they going to do about all the 300 dollar 1v's floating around? There's basically no way to be competitive there. Unless you make extremely cheap garbage with cheap garbage being the feature you're selling.....

>>3145863
you mean Lomo?

>>3145866
No I mean Leica....

>>3145805
there is though, film camera prices are the highest they've been in probably 12 years or more
that and kodak has rerelased a discontinued film stock

>>3145797
I doubt it.

To be of any value it would have to be better than any film DSLR ever made.
Which will make it quite expensive even with modern technology.

I do wonder if it would be possible to convert a DSLR into a film SLR?

>>3145884
The market price of a finite resource rising in response to scarcity resulting from attrition is not a boom.

Great camera but it breaks easily

>>3145797
No. It makes no economical sense.

Come on, OP. You know better.

>>3145884
>>3145805
>>3145801

>Kodak rereleases one film they killed off 3 years ago
>nothing to say of the other 2 films they killed off at the same time
>meanwhile, fuji kills off like 2 films a year

Much film.

Great boom.

I'll believe a film boom when I see Kodachrome 64 and Neopan 1600 on shelves again.

>paying >300 dollars for anything that shoots 135

KYS my man