Rate this picture
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 700D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.12 (Windows) Photographer KEVIN Maximum Lens Aperture f/5.7 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2017:08:27 17:34:07 Exposure Time 1/25 sec F-Number f/5.6 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 800 Lens Aperture f/5.6 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 51.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 4096 Image Height 2730 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard
Nothing special/10
>>3142618
>that watermark/name
is this really how you're branding yourself?
Not technically awful but what it's the point of it? Why would anyone look at this?
>>3142618
dont draw your watermark yourself, your lines are shit as well as their placement. pic is mediocre, composition is solid but the lighting on the guy could be much more interesting. also hes soft as hell.
>>3142618
That's a shit photo kev
>>3142618
crop your shit kev
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5.1 Windows Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2017:08:31 22:06:37 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 3155 Image Height 1854
>>3142618
RERRY RIKE/10
>>3142618
A badly cropped photo of some guy looking down? Hell yeah 10/10.
>>3142618
it's not actually bad but it's also nothing special about it.
the watermark would look way better in transparent